Skip to main content
Log in

Follow-up to

Tension headaches: What form of therapy is most effective?

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Biofeedback and Self-regulation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In an earlier study the authors reported on the relative effectiveness of three psychological methods of treating tension headache. This paper reports follow-up data on each procedure and focuses on variables seemingly related to long-term success. Follow-up occurred at 3, 6, and 12 months and involved I week of self-report records of headache activity and medication dosage. For the 30 original subjects, follow-up information was available for 23, 20, and 18 subjects, respectively, at each of the three follow-up periods. Questionnaire and physiological data indicated that the type of treatment offered was relevant only in explaining initial success. Continued practice of relaxation procedures seemed more important in explaining long-term outcomes. The relationship between type of training and continuing practice seemed to involve seveal heretofore unspecified “placebo” variables, which were explored and found to influence long-term success rates. Treatment procedures can presumably be modified to include these new variables, thus strengthening this therapeutic process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Benson, H.The relaxation response. New York: William Morrow, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Budzynski, T., Stoyva, J., Adler, C., & Mullaney, D. EMG biofeedback and tension headaache: A controlled outcome study.Psychosomatic Medicine 1973,35 484–496.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchings, D., & Reinking, R. Tension headaches: What form of therapy is most effective?Biofeedback and Self-Regulation 1976,1 169–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luthe, W. (Ed.).Autogenic therapy. New York: Grune and Stratton, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, N. Introduction: Current issues and key problems. In N. Miller, T. Barker, L. DiCara, J. Kamiya, D. Shapiro, & J. Stoyva (Eds.),Biofeedback and self-control. Chicago: Aldine, 1974. Pp. xi-xviii.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotter, J. Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement.Psychological Monographs, 1966,80(1, Whole No. 609).

  • Sargent, J., Greene, E., & Walters, E. Preliminary report on the use of autogenic feedback training in the treatment of migraine and tension headaches.Psychosomatic Medicine 1973,35 129–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolpe, J., & Lazarus, A.Behavior therapy techniques. New York: Pergamon Press, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Reinking, R.H., Hutchings, D. Follow-up to. Biofeedback and Self-Regulation 6, 57–62 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00998793

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00998793

Keywords

Navigation