Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Locus of control and frontal electromyographic response training

  • Articles
  • Published:
Biofeedback and Self-regulation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Forty-eight normal subjects from a college population, representing extreme internal and external orientations on a locus of control scale, were provided an auditory signal in a laboratory relaxation setting. For one group (feedback) the pitch of the signal varied as a function of frontal electromyographic (EMG) levels, while for another group (control) the pitch was constant. The feedback subjects acquired lower EMG potentials than did the control subjects, and the internal subjects in the feedback condition acquired lower levels than did the external subjects. In the control condition, no consistent differences in EMG levels between internal and external subjects were obtained. These results were stable across two replications, three ethnically distinct groups, and both sexes. Additional measures designed to reflect the effects of the frontal EMG training as a generalized relaxation technique for this population, including finger temperatures and a variety of postexperiment questionnaire ratings of relaxation, yielded negative results. Tests of other predictions from the locus of control construct are also discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander, A. B. An experimental test of assumptions relating to the use of electromyographic biofeedback as a general relaxation training technique.Psychophysiology 1975,12 656–662.

    Google Scholar 

  • Budzynski, T. H., & Stoyva, J. M. An instrument for producing deep muscle relaxation by means of analog information feedback.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 1969,2 231–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Budzynski, T. H., & Stoyva, J. M. Biofeedback techniques in behavior therapy. In N. Birbaumer (Ed.),Neuropsychologie der Angst. Reihe Fortschritte der Klinischen Psychologie. Bd. 3. Munchen, Berlin, Wien: Verlag Urban & Schwarzenberg, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gatchel, R. Change over training sessions of relationship between locus of control and voluntary heart rate control.Perceptual and Motor Skills 1975,40 424–426.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goesling, W., May, C., Lavont, D., Barnes, T., & Carreira, C. Relation between I/E locus of control and operant conditioning of alpha through biofeedback training.Perceptual and Motor Skills 1974,39 1339–1343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh, T. T., Skyhut, J., & Lotsof, E. J. Internal versus external control and ethnic group membership: A cross-cultural comparison.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1969,33 122–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R. K., & Meyer, R. G. The locus of control construct in EEG alpha rhythm feedback.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1974,42 913.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefcourt, H.Locus of control. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minke, K. A., & Carlson, J. G.Psychology and life unit mastery system instructor's guide. Chicago: Scott-Foresman, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowicki, S., & Strickland, B. A locus of control scale for children.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1973,40 148–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phares, E. J.Locus of control: A personality determinant of behavior. Morristown, New Jersey: General Learning Press, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phares, E. J.Locus of control in personality. Morristown, New Jersey: Silver-Burdett, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ray, W. J. The relationship of locus of control, self-report measures, and feedback to the voluntary control of heart rate.Psychophysiology 1974,11 527–534.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotter, J. B. Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement.Psychological Monographs, 1966,80 (1, Whole No. 609).

  • Sittenfeld, P., Budzynski, T., & Stoyva, J. Differential shaping of EEG theta rhythms.Biofeedback and Self-Regulation 1976,1 31–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Surwit, R. S., Shapiro, D., & Feld, J. Digital temperature autoregulation and associated cardiovascular changes.Psychophysiology 1976,13 242–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, C., Bourgeois, A., Levenson, H., & Denton, J. Multidimensional locus of control and voluntary control of GSR.Perceptual and Motor Skills 1974,39 1142.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, University of Hawaii at Manoa, 2430 Campus Road, 96822, Honolulu, Hawaii

    John G. Carlson

Authors
  1. John G. Carlson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

This research was supported by NIMH Special Postdoctoral Fellowship No. MH58202-01.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Carlson, J.G. Locus of control and frontal electromyographic response training. Biofeedback and Self-Regulation 2, 259–271 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00998651

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00998651

Keywords

Search

Navigation