Biofeedback and Self-regulation

, Volume 5, Issue 2, pp 265–273 | Cite as

Changing measurement instrument at follow-up a potential source of error

  • Timothy Cahn
  • Jeffrey R. Cram
Instrumentation And Methodology

Abstract

The purpose of this investigation was to determine whether headache activity information collected over the phone can be directly compared with headache activity information collected by systematic self-observation without jeopardizing internal validity because of calibration differences between the two measurement methods. A number of headache studies have relied on phone information for long-term follow-up data, while using systematic self-observation to collect all other data. Twenty-six headache sufferers participating in a tension headache study reported their headache activity over the phone and subsequently charted their headaches. Correlations were computed between the two measures. Results indicated that differences exist in the calibration of the two measurement methods. This seriously limits the conclusions of studies that used phone information to obtain follow-up data. Other recommendations concerning follow-up methodologies are discussed.

Keywords

Health Psychology Measurement Method Internal Validity Measurement Instrument Activity Information 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Budzynski, T., Stoyva, J., & Adler, C. Feedback-induced muscle relaxation: Application to tension headache.Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry 1970,1 205–211.Google Scholar
  2. Budzynski, T., Stoyva, J., Adler, C., & Mullaney, D. EMG biofeedback and tension headache: A controlled outcome study.Psychosomatic Medicine 1973,35 484–496.Google Scholar
  3. Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C.Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1963.Google Scholar
  4. Chesney, M. A., & Shelton, J. L. A comparison of muscle relaxation and electromyogram biofeedback treatments for muscle contraction headache.Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry 1976,7 221–225.Google Scholar
  5. Cox, J. J., Freundlich, A., & Meyer, R. G. Differential effectiveness of electromyograph feedback, verbal relaxation instructions, and medication placebo with tension headaches.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1975,43(6), 892–898.Google Scholar
  6. Epstein, L. H., Hersen, M., & Hemphill, D. Music feedback in the treatment of tension headache: An experimental case study.Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry 1974,5 59–63.Google Scholar
  7. Fichtler, H., & Zimmerman, R. R. Changes in reported pain from tension headache.Perceptual and Motor Skills 1972,36 712.Google Scholar
  8. Haynes, S., Moseley, D., & McGowan, W. T. Relaxation training and biofeedback in the reduction of frontalis muscle tension.Psychophysiology 1975,12(5), 547–552.Google Scholar
  9. Hutchings, D. G., & Reinking, R. H. Tension headaches: What form of therapy is most effective.Journal of Biofeedback and Self-Regulation 1976,1(2), 183–190.Google Scholar
  10. Kondo, C., & Canter, A. True and false electromyographic feedback: Effect on tension headache.Journal of Abnormal Psychology 1977,86(1), 93–95.Google Scholar
  11. Miller, N. E. Introduction: Current issues and key problems.Biofeedback and Self Control, 1973, 1974, xi–xx.Google Scholar
  12. Reeves, J. L. EMG-biofeedback reduction of tension headache: Cognitive skills—training approach.Biofeedback and Self-Regulation 1976,1(2), 217–226.Google Scholar
  13. Tasto, D. L., & Hinkle, J. E. Muscle relaxation treatment for tension headaches.Behavior Research and Therapy 1973,11 347–349.Google Scholar
  14. Weber, S., & Cook, T. Subject effects in laboratory research: An examination of subject roles, demand characteristics, and valid inference.Psychological Bulletin 1972,77(4), 272–295.Google Scholar
  15. Wickramasekera, I. Electromyographic feedback training and tension headache: Preliminary observations.American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis 1972,15 83–85.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • Timothy Cahn
    • 1
  • Jeffrey R. Cram
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Psychology, NI-25University of WashingtonSeattle

Personalised recommendations