Advertisement

Biofeedback and Self-regulation

, Volume 5, Issue 2, pp 221–228 | Cite as

Electromyographic biofeedback for tension control during fine motor skill acquisition

  • Stephen N. French
Original Articles

Abstract

The presence of residual muscular tension has been implicated as a detrimental influence on the performance and learning of motor skills. A method for reducing muscular tension has been provided by the advent of biofeedback training. This study investigated the effects of tension-control training by electromyographic (EMG) biofeedback on learning and performance of the pursuit-rotor backing task. Thirty young adult males were pretested for pursuit-rotor (PR) tracking skill, ranked by performance scores, and divided into identical triplicates to form two experimental groups and a control group. After a total of 3 hours of EMG biofeedback training for the experimental groups, all subjects were reevaluated on the PR test. One experimental group received biofeedback during the posttests. Analysis of variance of pretest-posttest difference means andt tests of scores representing performance and tension indicated that the EMG biofeedback training (1) significantly reduced tension induced by the novel motor skill and (2) significantly improved performance of the motor skill. Transfer of tension-control training was shown to facilitate learning and performance more than direct EMG biofeedback during performance. Residual tension reduction during learning was particularly facilitated by EMG biofeedback training, a profound implication for the management of stress in a variety of situations.

Keywords

Motor Skill Skill Acquisition Profound Implication Tension Reduction Fine Motor Skill 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Basmajian, J. V. Control and training of individual motor units.Science 1963,141 440–441.Google Scholar
  2. Basmajian, J. V.Muscles alive, their functions revealed by electromyography. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 1974.Google Scholar
  3. Berger, R. A., & Mathews, D. L. Movement time with various resistance loads as a function of pre-tensed and pre-relaxed muscular contractions.Research Quarterly 1969,40 456–459.Google Scholar
  4. Budzynski, T., & Stoyva, J.Biofeedback techniques in behavior therapy and autogenic training. Manuscript, University of Colorado Medical Center, 1971.Google Scholar
  5. Budzynski, T., Stoyva, J., & Adler, C. Feedback-induced muscle relaxation: Application to tension headache.Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry 1970,1 205–211.Google Scholar
  6. Cratty, B. J.Movement behavior and motor learning (3rd ed.). Philadelphia: Lea and Fabiger, 1973.Google Scholar
  7. Eason, R. G. Relation between effort, tension level, skill and performance efficiency in a perceptual-motor task.Perceptual and Motor Skills 1963,16 525–543.Google Scholar
  8. Edwards, A. L.Experimental design in psychological research. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1960.Google Scholar
  9. French, S. N. Electromyographic biofeedback for tension control during gross motor skill acquisition.Perceptual and Motor Skills 1978,47 883–889.Google Scholar
  10. Gaarder, K. Control of states of consciousness, Parts I and II.Archives of General Psychiatry 1971,25 429–435; 436–441.Google Scholar
  11. Gibbs, C. B. Servo control systems in organisms and the transfer of skill. In D. Legge(Ed.),Skills. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1970.Google Scholar
  12. Green, E. E., Green, A. M., & Walters, E. D. Voluntary control of internal states: Psychological and physiological.Journal of Transpersonal Psychology 1970,2 1–26.Google Scholar
  13. Green, E. E., Walters, E. D., Green, A. M., & Murphy, G. Feedback techniques for deep relaxation.Psychophysiology 1969,6 371–377.Google Scholar
  14. Jacobson, E.Progressive relaxation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1938.Google Scholar
  15. Koerthe, W. A. A pursuit apparatus: Eye-hand co-ordination.Psychology Monographs 1922,31 288–292.Google Scholar
  16. Lippold, O. C. J. The relation between integrated action potentials in the human muscle and its isometric tension.Journal of Physiology 1952,117 492–499.Google Scholar
  17. Malmo, R. Emotion and muscle tension.Psychology Today, March 1970, pp. 64–67.Google Scholar
  18. Marteniuk, R. G. Motor performance and induced muscular tension.Research Quarterly 1969,39 1025–1031.Google Scholar
  19. Martens, R. Anxiety and motor behavior: A review.Journal of Motor Behavior 1971,3 151–179.Google Scholar
  20. Mathews, A. M., & Gelder, M. G. Psycho-physiological investigations of brief relaxation training.Journal of Psychosomatic Research 1969,13 1–12.Google Scholar
  21. Schultz, J. H., & Luthe, W.Autogenic training. New York: Grune and Stratton, 1959.Google Scholar
  22. Vitti, M., & Basmajian, J. V. Electromyographic investigation of procerus and frontalis muscles.Electromyography in Clinical Neurophysiology 1976,16 227–236.Google Scholar
  23. Whatmore, G. B., & Kohli, D. Dysponesis: A neurophysiologic factor in functional disorders.Behavior Science 1968,13 102–124.Google Scholar
  24. Wilson, A., & Wilson, A. S. Psychophysiological and learning correlates of anxiety and induced muscle relaxation.Psychophysiology 1970,6 740–748.Google Scholar
  25. Wolpe, J.The practice of behavior therapy. New York: Pergamon Press, 1969.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stephen N. French
    • 1
  1. 1.State College of Victoria-RusdenClaytonAustralia

Personalised recommendations