Skip to main content
Log in

Awareness during electromyographic biofeedback: Of signal or process?

  • Articles
  • Published:
Biofeedback and Self-regulation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

During relaxation training, awareness of trial-to-trial changes in frontalis-muscle tension levels was assessed with and without auditory electromyographic(EMG) biofeedback. Immediately after each 128-sec training trial, the subject was required to guess whether muscle tension indexed by EMG activity increased(“Up”) or decreased(“Down”) relative to the immediately preceding trial. The probability of correct guessing, P(c), improved as the absolute difference in EMG increased between trials only when biofeedback was presented. For subjects not receiving biofeedback, P(c) remained low even when the absolute difference between trials was large. Subjects in each condition employed a strategy to guess “Down” more often consistent with the expectation that they were being trained to relax. The “Down” set strategy was shown to be separable from the informational basis of P(c) provided by biofeedback. This procedure can be employed to evaluate central assumptions of biofeedback relating to posttraining awareness of changes in muscle tension and the relationship between awareness and control of muscle tension.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Budzynski, T. H., & Stoyva, J. M. An instrument of producing deep muscle relaxation by means of analog information feedback.Journal of Applied Behavioral Analysis 1969,2 231–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, J. F.Manual of surface electromyography (Tech. Rep. 59-184). Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio: Aerospace Medical Laboratory, December 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, E. E., Walters, E. D., Green, A. M., & Murphy, G. Feedback technique for deep relaxation.Psychophysiology 1969,6 371–377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobsen, E.Progressive relaxation Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinsman, R. A., O'Banion, K., Robinson, S., & Staudenmayer, H. Continuous biofeedback and discrete posttrial verbal feedback infrontalis muscle relaxation training.Psychophysiology 1975,12 30–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staudenmayer, H., & Kinsman, R. A.Trial by trial method of training frontalis muscle relaxation: Awareness and modes of feedback (Report No. 17). Denver, Colorado: Psychophysiology Research Laboratories, National Jewish Hospital and Research Center, August 1974.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Staudenmayer, H., Kinsman, R.A. Awareness during electromyographic biofeedback: Of signal or process?. Biofeedback and Self-Regulation 1, 191–199 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00998586

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00998586

Keywords

Navigation