Journal of Nonverbal Behavior

, Volume 15, Issue 2, pp 99–105 | Cite as

Vocal signs of confidence

  • Charles E. Kimble
  • Steven D. Seidel


This study examined whether two paralinguistic variables, vocal loudness and response latency, were associated with confidence in answers to trivia questions. Audience presence and size were manipulated and subjects' assertiveness was measured. Subjects verbally responded to trivia questions by indicating their choice and how confident they were in each answer. Tapes of these responses were later analyzed for latency of response and loudness of speech. As expected, the more confident individuals were in their answers, the faster and louder they responded. Assertive subjects spoke louder. The presence of an audience had no effects on vocal responding. Apparently, the confidence of a speaker can be inferred from the speed and loudness of the speaker's responses.


Social Psychology Response Latency Vocal Sign Trivia Question Vocal Loudness 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Apple, W., Streeter, L. A., & Krauss, R. B. (1979). Effects of pitch and speech rate on personal attributions.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 715–727.Google Scholar
  2. Bond, C. E., & Titus, L. J. (1983). Social facilitation: A meta-analysis of 241 studies.Psychological Bulletin, 94, 265–292.Google Scholar
  3. Cook, M. (1969). Anxiety, speech disturbance, and speech rate.British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 8, 13–21.Google Scholar
  4. DePaulo, B. M., Stone, J. I., & Lassiter, D. G. (1985). Telling ingratiating lies: Effects of target sex and target attractiveness on verbal and nonverbal deceptive success.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 1191–1203.Google Scholar
  5. Ekman, P., Davidson, R. J., & Friesen, W. V. (1990). The Duchenne smile: Emotional expression and brain physiology II.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 342–353.Google Scholar
  6. Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1969). Nonverbal leakage and cues to deception.Psychiatry, 32, 88–108.Google Scholar
  7. Erickson, B., Lind, E. A., Johnson, B. C., & O'Barr, W. M. (1978). Speech style and impression formation in a court setting: The effects of “powerful” and “powerless” speech.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 14, 266–279.Google Scholar
  8. Exline, R. V., Ellyson, S. L., & Long, B. D. (1975). Visual behavior as an aspect of power role relationships. In P. Pliner, L. Krames, & T. Alloway (Eds.),Advances in the study of communication and affect (Vol. 2). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  9. Hemsley, G. D., & Doob, A. N. (1978). The effect of looking behavior on perceptions of a communicator's credibility.Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 8, 135–144.Google Scholar
  10. Kimble, C. E., & Musgrove, J. I. (1988). Dominance in arguing, mixed-sex dyads: Visual dominance patterns, talking time, and speech loudness.Journal of Research in Personality, 22, 1–16.Google Scholar
  11. Latane, B. (1981). The psychology of social impact.American Psychologist, 36, 343–356.Google Scholar
  12. LeCompte, W. A. (1981). The ecology of anxiety: Situational stress and rate of self-stimulation in Turkey.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 712–721.Google Scholar
  13. MacLachlan, J., Czepiel, J., & LaBarbera, P. (1979). Implementation of response latency measures.Journal of Marketing Research, 16, 573–577.Google Scholar
  14. Miller, N., Maruyama, G., Beaber, R. J., & Vallone, K. (1976). Speed of speech and persuasion.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 615–624.Google Scholar
  15. Rathus, S. (1973). A 30-item schedule for assessing assertive behavior.Behavior Therapy, 4, 398–406.Google Scholar
  16. Scherer, K. R., London, H., & Wolf, J. J. (1973). The voice of confidence: Paralinguistic cues and audience evaluation.Journal of Research in Personality, 7, 31–44.Google Scholar
  17. Streeter, L. A., Krauss, R. M., Geller, V., Olson, C., & Apple, W. (1977). Pitch changes during attempted deception.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 345–350.Google Scholar
  18. Zajonc, R. B. (1965). Social facilitation.Science, 149, 269–274.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Charles E. Kimble
    • 2
  • Steven D. Seidel
    • 1
  1. 1.Miami UniversityUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyUniversity of DaytonDayton

Personalised recommendations