Skip to main content
Log in

The scintigraphy of sacroiliac joints

A comparison of99mTc-DPD and99mTc-MDP

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The accumulation of99mTc-methylene diphosphonate (99mTc-MDP) and99mTc-dicarboxypropane diphosphonate (99mTc-DPD) in sacroiliac (si) joints was evaluated as a function of imaging time in 22 control patients and 5 patients with sacroiliitis. The controls were injected with either99mTc-DPD or99mTc-MDP (12 and 10 patients, respectively) and the patients with sacroiliitis with both agents within 5 days. Both the anterior and posterior views of the si joints were taken. The sacroiliac joint-to-sacrum (SI/S) ratio was calculated with the region of interest method. No statistically significant differences between these bone-seeking agents were found in the SI/S ratios of the control or the diseased patients. A clear overlap of indices (mean ± SD) was found between the control patients and the patients with sacroiliitis. When the inflamed si joint was divided into three small adjacent areas and the SI/S ratios calculated for these areas, a statistically significant (P < 0.001) increase in the SI/S ratio was noticed when compared with the SI/S ratio of the whole joint. Comparison of control patients and patients with sacroiliitis showed the most significant differences in the anterior views as well as in theP value:P < 0.001 in all patients injected with99mTc-DPD and in most patients injected with99mTc MDP. In the posterior views, the significance was less marked. In every case, the inflamed part of the si joint was visible in the anterior views. The background subtraction had the greatest effect on the SI/S ratio of anterior images, but in the posterior views no significance was found. The low specificity of sacroiliac joint imaging must be taken into consideration when the results are interpreted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Armco S, Eschard J-P, Gougeon J, Liehn J-C, Valeyre J (1987) Anterior view on bone scan for the early diagnosis of bacterial lumbar spondylitis. J Nucl Med 28:254–255

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayres J, Hilson AJW, Maisey MN, Laurent R, Panay GS, Saunders AJ (1981) An improved method for sacro-iliac joint imaging: a study of normal subjects, patients with sacro-iliitis and patients with low back pain. Clin Radiol 32:441–445

    Google Scholar 

  • Bull U, Schuster H, Pfeifer JP, Tongendorff J, Niendorf HP (1977) Bone-to-bone, joint-to-bone and joint-to-joint ratios in normal and diseased skeletal states using region-of-interest technique and bone-seeking-radiopharmaceuticals. Nucl Med 16:104–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Calin A (1985) Ankylosing spondylitis. Clin Rheum Dis 11:41–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Dequeker J, Goddeeris T, Walravens M, De Roo M (1978) Evaluation of sacro-iliitis: comparison of radiological and radionuclide techniques. Radiology 128:687–689

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodig D, Douljan Z, Popović S, Simonović I (1988) Effect of imaging time on the values of the sacroiliac index. Eur J Nucl Med 14:504–506

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn EC, Ebringer RW, Ell PJ (1980) Quantitative scintigraphy in the early diagnosis of sacro-iliitis. Rheumatol Rehabil 19:69–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Namey TC, McIntyre J, Buse M, LeRoy EC (1977) Nucleographic studies of axial spondarthritides. Arthritis Rheum 19:607–612

    Google Scholar 

  • Pauwels EKJ, Blom J, Camps JAJ, Hermans J, Rijke AM (1983) A comparison between the diagnostic efficacy of99mTc-MDP,99mTc-DPD and99mTc-HDP for the detection of bony metastases. Eur J Nucl Med 8:118–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitkänen M, Lahtinen T, Hyödynmaa S, Mutru O, Länsimies E (1982) Quantitative sacro-iliac scintigraphy. Scand J Rheumatol 11:199–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthall L (1987) The bone scan in arthritis. In: Fogelman I (ed) Bone scanning in clinical practise. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York London, pp 133–187

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell AS, Lentle BC, Percy JS (1975) Investigation of sacroiliac disease: comparative evaluation of radiological and radionuclide techniques. J Rheumatol 2:45–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Scanzo E, Lindvall N (1978) Quantitative99mTc-perteehnetate scanning of sacro-iliac joints. Scand J Rheumatol 7:93–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Vorne M, Vähätalo S, Lantto T (1983) A clinical comparison of99mTc-DPD and two99mTc-MDP agents. Eur J Nucl Med 8:395–397

    Google Scholar 

  • Vyas K, Eklem M, Seto H, Bobba VR, Brown P, Haines J, Krishnamurthy GT (1981) Quantitative scintigraphy of sacroiliacjoints: effect of age, gender and laterality. Am J Roentgenol 136:589–592

    Google Scholar 

  • Weissman BN (1987) Spondylarthropathies. Radiol Clin North Am 25:1235–1262

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lantto, T. The scintigraphy of sacroiliac joints. Eur J Nucl Med 16, 677–681 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00998168

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00998168

Key words

Navigation