Abstract
This manuscript integrates the utility-increasing advantages of risk reductions into well-known value-of-information justifications for executive information systems (EIS). Accordingly, even some EISs which never pay for themselves financially can be advantageous if they sufficiently reduce the uncertainty of net income for “risk averse” hospitals. The manuscript demonstrates the potential importance of risk reductions in the context of a hypothetical hospital administrator charged with selecting among alternative managed care contracts, each with uncertain outcomes. An administrator representing a hospital with diminishing marginal utility from income, a standard interpretation of risk-aversion, may find that an otherwise unprofitable EIS reduces income variations (risk) sufficiently to justify its purchase.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Woolhandler, S., Himmelstein, D.U., and Lewontin, J.P., Administrative costs in U.S. hospitals.N. Engl. J. Med. 329:400–3, 1993.
Glandon, G.L., and Shapira, R.J., Benefit-cost analysis of hospital information systems: the state of the (non) art.J. Health Hum. Res. Admin. 11:30–92, Summer 1988.
Glandon, G.L., and Buck, T.L., Cost-benefit analysis of medical information systems: a critique. In (J. Anderson, C. Aydin, and S. Jay, eds.).Evaluating Health Care Information Systems: Methods and Applications, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, 1993.
Van Horne, J.C.,Financial Management and Policy, (seventh edition), Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1986, pp. 34–39.
Ibid., p. 64.
Ibid., p. 204.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Woodward, R.S., Boxerman, S.B. The value of risk-reducing information. J Med Syst 18, 111–116 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00997289
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00997289