Skip to main content

Strong feelings: Emotional responses to presidents

Political Behavior volume 13, pages 33–65 (1991)Cite this article

Abstract

Although rational models of political behavior prevail in research on public approval of presidents, an emotions model is proposed to consider whether it actually predicts approval as well as, if not better than, the existing rational models. The emotions model is tested for Presidents Carter and Reagan using the American National Election Studies from 1980 to 1986. The model is compared with two rational models: one, an events and conditions model, suggests that people's prospective and retrospective views of their own financial circumstances and the economy dictate their approval of presidential performance; a second, an issue proximity model, proposes that the closeness (or distance) people perceive between their views on key issues and those of the president affects their approval of the president's job. Across numerous tests, the results indicate that the emotions model outperforms either of the rational models. In addition, a multivariate analysis combining rational and emotional indicators shows the strength of the emotions variables. The study concludes that political science research must more fully consider rational and emotional explanations of political behavior.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price includes VAT (Canada)

References

  • Abelson, Robert, Donald Kinder, Mark Peters, and Susan Fiske (1982). Affective and semantic components in political person perception.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 42: 619–630.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aldrich, John, John Sullivan, and Eugene Borgida (1989). Foreign affairs and issue voting: Do presidential candidates ‘Waltz before a blind audience.’American Political Science Review 83 (March): 123–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, Douglas (1978).Congress and the Bureaucracy. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, Aaron (1976).Cognitive Therapy and the Emotional Disorders. New York: International Universities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, Aaron, et al. (1987). Differentiating anxiety and depression: A test of the cognitive content-specificity hypothesis.Journal of Abnormal Psychology 96: 179–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaney, P. (1986). Affect and memory.Psychological Bulletin 99: 229–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bower, G. (1981). Mood and memory.American Psychologist 36: 129–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breckler, Steven (1984). Empirical validation of affect, behavior, and cognition as distinct components of attitude.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 47(December): 1191–1205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brody, Richard, and Benjamin Page (1975). The impact of events on presidential popularity: The Johnson and Nixon administrations. In A. Wildavsky (ed.),Perspectives on the Presidency, Boston: Little, Brown, pp. 136–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Budge, Ian, Ivor Crewe, and Denise Farlie, eds. (1976).Partly Identification and Beyond. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conover, Pamela, and Stanley Feldman (1986). Emotional reactions to the economy.American Journal of Political Science 30(February): 50–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawes, R., and E. Kramer (1966). A proximity analysis of vocally expressed emotion.Perceptual and Motor Skills 22: 571–574.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derryberry, J. (1988). Emotional influences on evaluative judgements: Roles of arousal, attention, and spreading activation.Motivation and Emotion 12: 23–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, N. F. (1981).Preconscious Processing. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downs, Anthony (1957).An Economic Theory of Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dye, Thomas, and L. Harmon Ziegler (1985).American Politics in the Media Age. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks-Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiorina, Morris (1981).Retrospective Voting in American National Elections. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, Susan (1981). Social cognition and affect. In J. Harvey (ed.),Cognition, Social Behavior, and the Environment. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, Susan, and Shelley Taylor (1984).Social Cognition. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fromme, Donald, and Clayton O'Brien (1982). A dimensional approach to the circular ordering of the emotions.Motivation and Emotion 6(December): 337–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hibbs, Douglas (1982). The dynamics for political support for American presidents among occupational and partisan groups.American Journal of Political Science 26(June): 312–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isen, Alice, and Kimberly Daubman (1984). The influence of affect of categorization.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 47: 1206–1217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isen, Alice, and Barbara Means (1983). The influence of positive affect on decision-making strategy.Social Cognition 2(January): 18–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isen, Alice, B. Means, R. Patrick, and G. Nowicki (1982). Some factors influencing decision-making strategy and risk-taking. In M. Clark and S. Fiske (eds.),Affects and Cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Izard, C. E. (1977).Human Emotions. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, John (1975). Issues, party choices, and presidential votes.American Journal of Political Science 19(May): 161–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joreskog, Karl, and Dag Sorbom (1983).LISREL VI Estimation of Linear Structural Equation Systems. Chicago: Scientific Software.

    Google Scholar 

  • Judge, G., et al. (1985).The Theory and Practice of Econometrics. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, Stanley, and Thad Mirer (1974). The simple act of voting.American Political Science Review 68: 572–591.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kernell, Samuel (1978). Explaining presidential popularity.American Political Science Review 72(June): 506–522.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiewiet, D. Roderick (1983).Macroeconomics and Micropolitics: The Electoral Effects of Economic Issues. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinder, Donald (1981). Presidents, prosperity, and public opinion.Public Opinion Quarterly 45: 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus, Richard (1982). Thoughts on the relations between emotion and cognition.American Psychologist 37(September): 1019–1024.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKuen, Michael (1983). Political drama, economic conditions, and the dynamics of presidential popularity.American Journal of Political Science 27: 165–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, George (1988). The structure of emotional response: 1984 presidential candidates.American Political Science Review 82(September): 737–761.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, George, and Wendy Rahn (1988). Emotions and democratic politics. In S. Long (ed.),Research in Micropolitics. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayhew, David (1978).Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Arthur, Martin Wattenberg, and Oksana Malanchuk (1986). Schematic assessments of presidential candidates.American Political Science Review 80: 522–540.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monroe, Kristen, and Dona Laughlin (1983). Economic influences on presidential popularity among key political and socioeconomic groups.Political Behavior 5(September): 309–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreland, Richard, and Robert Zajonc (1979). Exposure effects may not depend on stimulus recognition.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 37: 1085–1089.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, John (1970). Presidential popularity from Truman to Johnson.American Political Science Review 64(March): 18–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, Charles, and Dennis Simon (1985). Promise and performance: A dynamic model of presidential popularity.American Political Science Review 79(June): 334–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Page, Benjamin (1978).Choices and Echoes in Presidential Elections. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Page, Benjamin, and Calvin Jones (1979). Reciprocal effects of policy preferences, party loyalties and the vote.American Political Science Review 73: 1071–1090.

    Google Scholar 

  • Page, Benjamin, and Robert Shapiro (1983). Effects of public opinion on policy.American Political Science Review 77(March): 179–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Page, Benjamin, Robert Shapiro, and Glenn Dempsey (1987). What moves public opinion.American Political Science Review 81(March): 23–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plutchik, Robert (1980).Emotion: A Psychoevolutionary Synthesis. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plutchik, Robert (1985). On emotion: The chicken-and-egg problem revisited.Motivation and Emotion 9: 197–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pomper, Gerald (1972). From confusion to clarity: Issues and American voters.American Political Science Review 66: 415–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • RePass, David (1971). Issue salience and party choice.American Political Science Review 65: 398–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roseman, Ira (1984). Cognitive determinants of emotions: A structural theory. In P. Shaver (ed.),Review of Personality and Social Psychology vol. 1. Beverly Hills: Sage, pp. 11–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roseman, Ira, Robert Abelson, and Michael Ewing (1986). Emotion and political cognition: Emotional appeals in political communication. In R. Lau and D. Sears (eds.),Political Cognition, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 279–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Royce, Joseph and Stephen Diamond (1980). “A Multifactor-System Dynamics Theory of Emotion.”Motivation and Emotion. 4: 263–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, James (1980). A circumplex model of affect.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 39(December): 1161–1178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, K., J. Koivumaki, and R. Rosenthal (1972). Minimal cues in vocal communication of affect: Judging emotions from content-masked speech.Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 1: 269–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sears, David, Richard Lau, Tom Tyler, and Harris Allen (1980). Self-interest v. symbolic politics in policy attitudes and presidential voting.American Political Science Review 74(September): 670–684.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, Robert, and Bruce Conforto (1980). Presidential performance, the economy, and the public's evaluations of economic conditions.Journal of Politics 42(February): 49–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shields, Stephanie (1984). Distinguishing between emotion and nonemotion: Judgments about experience.Motivation and Emotion 8: 355–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sigelman, Lee, and Pamela Conover (1981). The dynamics of presidential support during international conflict situations: The Iranian hostage crisis.Political Behavior 3(December): 303–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sigelman, Lee, and Kathleen Knight (1985). Public opinion and presidential responsibility for the economy: Understanding personalization.Political Behavior 7(June): 167–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sigelman, Lee, and Kathleen Knight (1983). Why does presidential popularity decline? A test of the expectation/disillusion theory.Public Opinion Quarterly 47(Fall): 310–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stimson, James (1976). Public support for American presidents: A cyclical model.Public Opinion Quarterly 40(Spring): 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, Denis, and Roger Masters (1988). Happy warriors: Leaders' facial displays, viewers emotions, and political support.American Journal of Political Science 32: 345–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tufte, Edward (1978).The Political Control of the Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, David, and Auke Tellegen (1985). Toward a consensual structure of mood.Political Behavior 98(September): 219–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zajonc, R. B. (1980). Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences.American Psychologist 35(February): 151–175.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Arizona, USA

    Lyn Ragsdale

Authors
  1. Lyn Ragsdale
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ragsdale, L. Strong feelings: Emotional responses to presidents. Polit Behav 13, 33–65 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00996998

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00996998

Keywords

  • Rational Model
  • Political Behavior
  • National Election
  • Strong Feeling
  • Election Study