The purpose of this paper is to give an explication of the concept of health which does not rely on the concept of disease. The explication is informed by a view of the human individual as an acting subject and it therefore places the abilities of agents in the centre. Abilities may be qualified in different ways. The qualification essential for understanding the dimension of health and illness relates abilities to environmental circumstances and high-ranking projects in the life plan. For this purpose generalized adaptedness is introduced as the overarching construction. The dimension of health and illness is characterized in terms of the adequacy of the repertoire for generalized adaptedness. Some immediate consequences concerning the notion of care are noted.
Key wordsadaptedness care generic ability health illness time-specific ability
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Pörn I.Action Theory and Social Science. Some Formal Models. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Co, 1977.Google Scholar
- 2.Pörn I. The dialectic of the soul: an essay on Kierkegaard.Acta Philosophica Fennica 1981;32:198–210.Google Scholar
- 3.Morris P.Power. A Philosophical Analysis. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
- 4.Nordenfelt L.On the Nature of Health: An Action-Theoretic Approach. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Co, 1987.Google Scholar
- 5.Goldman AI.A Theory of Human Action. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall Inc, 1970.Google Scholar
- 6.Bowlby J.Attachment and Loss. Vol. I: Attachment. New York: Basic Books Inc, 1969.Google Scholar
- 7.Whitbeck C. A theory of health. In: Caplan AL, Engelhardt HT Jr, McCartney JJ, eds.Concepts of Health and Disease: Interdisciplinary Perspectives. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley Publishing Co, 1981:611–626.Google Scholar
- 8.Hellström O. The importance of a holistic concept of health care. Examples from the clinic. This issue, pp. 325–342.Google Scholar