Advertisement

Motivation and Emotion

, Volume 14, Issue 4, pp 265–286 | Cite as

Evolutionary social psychology: Prospects and pitfalls

  • David M. Buss
Special Issue: Symposium On Sociobiology

Abstract

The principles of evolutionary psychology and the traditional assumptions of social psychology are highly compatible. Both disciplines trace observed behavioral variability to situational variability. Both assume that psychological mechanisms sensitive to social information are central to causal accounts of social behavior. Questions about the origins and functions of these psychological mechanisms are indispensable for understanding social behavior. Evolutionary psychology provides conceptual tools for addressing these questions. Several pitfalls must be avoided by practitioners of evolutionary social psychology. Specifically, we must jettison notions of genetic determinism and behavioral unmodifiability, eliminate false dichotomies between “genetic” and “learned,” and place cross-cultural variability in a sensible theoretical context. Attending to the reliable phenomena discovered by traditional social psychology and the conceptual frameworks provided by modern evolutionary psychology will produce the most informed evolutionary social psychology.

Keywords

Social Psychology Conceptual Framework Social Behavior Social Information Evolutionary Psychology 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alexander, R. D. (1987).The biology of moral systems. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  2. Asch, S. (1955). Opinions and social pressures.Scientific American, 193 31–35.Google Scholar
  3. Bandura, A. (1977).Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  4. Baumeister, R. F., & Tice, D. M. (1990). Anxiety and social exclusion.Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 9 165–195.Google Scholar
  5. Berscheid, E., & Walster, E. (1974). Physical attractiveness. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.),Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 7, pp. 157–215). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  6. Betzig, L. (1989). Causes of conjugal dissolution: A cross-cultural study.Current Anthropology, 30 654–676.Google Scholar
  7. Brewer, M. B., & Caporael, L. R. (this issue). Selfish genes vs. selfish people: Sociobiology as origin myth.Motivation and Emotion, 14, 237–243.Google Scholar
  8. Buss, D. M. (1988). The evolution of human intrasexual competition: Tactics of mate attraction.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54 661–628,Google Scholar
  9. Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures.Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12 1–49.Google Scholar
  10. Buss, D. M. (1990). The evolution of anxiety and social exclusion.Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 9 196–201.Google Scholar
  11. Buss, D. M. (1991). Evolutionary personality psychology.Annual Review of Psychology. Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews.Google Scholar
  12. Cantor, N. (this issue). Social psychology and sociobiology: What can we leave to evolution?Motivation and Emotion, 14, 245–254.Google Scholar
  13. Clark, M. S., & Reis, H. T. (1988). Interpersonal processes in close relationships.Annual Review of Psychology, 39 609–672.Google Scholar
  14. Cosmides, L. (1989). The logic of social exchange: Has natural selection shaped how humans reason?Cognition, 31 187–276.Google Scholar
  15. Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (1987). From evolution to behavior: Evolutionary psychology as the missing link. In J. Dupre (Ed.),The latest on the best: Essays on evolution and optimality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  16. Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (1989). Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture, Part II. Case Study: A computational theory of social exchange.Ethology and Sociobiology, 10 51–98.Google Scholar
  17. Cunningham, M. R. (1986). Measuring the physical in physical attractiveness: Quasi-experiments on the sociobiology of female beauty.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50 925–935.Google Scholar
  18. Daly, M. (1989). Parent-offspring conflict and violence in evolutionary perspective. In R. W. Bell & N. J. Bell (Eds.),Sociobiology and the social sciences (pp.25–43. Lubbock: Texas Tech University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Daly, M., & Wilson, N. (1988).Homicide. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  20. Daly, M., Wilson, M., & Weghorst, S. J. (1982). Male sexual jealousy.Ethology and Sociobiology, 3 11–27.Google Scholar
  21. Darley, J. M., & Latane, B. (1968). Bystander intervention in emergencies: Diffusion of responsibility.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 8 377–383.Google Scholar
  22. Darwin, C. (1871).The descent of man and selection in relation to sex. London: Murray.Google Scholar
  23. Dickeman, M. (1975). Demographic consequences of infanticide in man.Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 7 107–137.Google Scholar
  24. Gangestad, S. W., & Simpson, J. A. (1990). Toward an evolutionary history of female sociosexual variation.Journal of Personality 58 69–96.Google Scholar
  25. Gould, S. J. (1987). Freudian slip?Natural History, 2 14–21.Google Scholar
  26. Hamilton, W. D. (1964). The evolution of social behavior.Journal of Theoretical Biology, 7 1–52.Google Scholar
  27. Hamilton, W. D. (1980). Sex versus non-sex versus parasite.Oikos, 35 282–290.Google Scholar
  28. Hill, K., & Kaplan, H. (1988). Tradeoffs in male and female reproductive strategies among the Ache. In L. Betzig, M. Borgerhoff Mulder, & P. Turke (Eds.),Human reproductive behavior (pp.277–306. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Kenrick, D. T., Sadalla, E. K., Groth, G., & Trost, M. R. (1990). Evolution, traits, and the stages of human courtship: Qualifying the parental investment model.Journal of Personality, 58 97–116.Google Scholar
  30. Langois, J., & Roggman, L. A. (1990). Attractive faces are only average.Psychological Science, 1 115–121.Google Scholar
  31. Latane, B. (1981). The psychology of social impact.American Psychologist, 36 343–356.Google Scholar
  32. Low, B. S. (1989). Cross-cultural patterns in the training of children: An evolutionary perspective.Journal of Comparative Psychology, 103 311–319.Google Scholar
  33. Marks, I. M. (1987).Fears, phobias, and rituals. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  34. McGuire, M., & Troisi, A. (1987). Physiological regulation-deregulation and psychiatric disorders.Ethology and Sociobiology, 8 9–27.Google Scholar
  35. Milgram, S. (1963). Behavioral study of obedience.Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67 371–378.Google Scholar
  36. Minturn, L., & Stashak, J. (1982). Infanticide as a terminal abortion procedure.Behavior Science Research, 17 70–90.Google Scholar
  37. Nisbett, R. E. (this issue). Evolutionary psychology, biology, and cultural evolution.Motivation and Emotion, 14, 255–263.Google Scholar
  38. Pinker, S., & Bloom, P. (1990). Natural language and natural selection.Behavioral and Brain Sciences.Google Scholar
  39. Rancour-Laferriere, D. (1985).Signs of the flesh: An essay on the evolution of hominid sexuality. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  40. Sadalla, E. K., Kenrick, D. T., & Vershure, B. (1987). Dominance and heterosexual attraction.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52 730–738.Google Scholar
  41. Seligman, M. E. P., & Hagar, J. L. (Eds.) (1972).Biological boundaries of learning. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
  42. Snyder, M., Simpson, J. A., & Gangestad, S. (1986). Personality and sexual relations.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51 417–447.Google Scholar
  43. Symons, D. (1979).The evolution of human sexuality. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Symons, D. (1987). If we're all Darwinians, what's the fuss about? In C. Crawford, M. Smith, & D. Krebs (Eds.),Sociobiology and psychology: Ideas, issues, and applications (pp.121–146. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  45. Symons, D. (1990). On the use and misuse of Darwinism in the study of human behavior. In J. Barkow, L. Cosmides, & J. Tooby (Eds.),The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture.Google Scholar
  46. Tajfel, H. (1982). Social psychology of intergroup relations. In M. R. Rosensweig & L. W. Porter (Eds.),Annual review of psychology (Vol. 33). Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews.Google Scholar
  47. Tooby, J. (1982). Pathogens, polymorphism, and the evolution of sex.Journal of Theoretical Biology, 97 557–576.Google Scholar
  48. Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (1990). The past explains the present: Emotional adaptations and the structure of ancestral environments.Ethology and Sociobiology, 11 375–424.Google Scholar
  49. Townsend, J. M. (1989). Mate selection criteria: A pilot study.Ethology and Sociobiology, 10 214–254.Google Scholar
  50. Trivers, R. (1971). The evolution of reciprocal altruism.Quarterly Review of Biology, 46 35–57.Google Scholar
  51. Trivers, R. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In B. Campbell (Ed.),Sexual selection and the descent of man: 1871–1971 (pp.136–179. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
  52. Wilson, M., & Daly, M. (1987). Risk of maltreatment of children living with step-parents. In R. J. Gelles & J. B. Lancaster (Eds.),Child abuse and neglect. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  53. Zuckerman, M. (1979). Attribution of success and failure revisted, or: The motivational bias is alive and well in attribution theory.Journal of Personality, 47 245–287.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • David M. Buss
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of MichiganAnn Arbor

Personalised recommendations