Motivation and Emotion

, Volume 4, Issue 1, pp 77–101

The nature and acquisition of a preference for chili pepper by humans

  • Paul Rozin
  • Deborah Schiller
Article

Abstract

This paper deals with the general problem of the acquisition of positive affective responses, by study of the reversal of an innate aversion to the irritant properties of chili pepper. Interviews, observations, and measurements were carried out in both Mexico and the United States. Exposure to gradually increasing levels of chili in food seems to be a sufficient condition for preference development. Chili likers are not insensitive to the irritation that it produces. They come to like the same burning sensation that deters animals and humans that dislike chili; there is a clear hedonic shift. This could be produced by association with positive events, including enhancement of the taste of bland foods, postingestional effects, or social rewards. It is also possible that the initial negative response to chili pepper is essential for the eventual liking. Chili stimulates an innate sensory “warning” system but is not harmful. The enjoyment of the irritation may result from the user's appreciation that the sensation and the body's defensive reaction to it are harmless. Eating of chili, riding on roller coasters, taking very hot baths, and many other human activities can be considered instances of thrill seeking or enjoyment of “constrained risks.” Evidence for and against various explanations of chili ingestion is presented.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Albrecht, G. L. The alcoholism process; a social learning view. In P. G. Bourne & R. Fox (Eds.),Alcoholism: Progres in research and treatment. New York: Academic Press, 1973.Google Scholar
  2. Bacon, M. K. Cross-cultural studies of drinking. In P. G. Bourne & R. Fox (Eds.),Alcoholism: Progress in research and treatment. New York: Academic Press, 1973.Google Scholar
  3. Bain, A.The senses and the intellect (3rd ed.). London: Longmans, Green, 1868Google Scholar
  4. Brown, L. T., Ruder, V. G., Ruder, J. H., & Young, S. D. Stimulation seeking and the change seeker index.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1974,42 311.Google Scholar
  5. Child, I. L., Cooperman, M., & Wolowitz, H. M. Esthetic preferences and other correlates of active versus passive food preferences.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1969,11 75–84.Google Scholar
  6. Damon, A. Smoking attitudes and practices in seven preliterate societies. In W. L. Dunn (Ed.),Smoking behavior: Motives and incentives. Washington, D.C.: V. H. Winston, 1973.Google Scholar
  7. Fischer, R., Griffin, F., England, S., & Garn, S. M. Taste thresholds and food dislikes.Nature 1961,191 1328.Google Scholar
  8. Garcia, J., Kovner, R., & Green, K. F. Cue properties versus palatability of flavors in avoidance learning.Psychonomic Science 1970,20 313–314.Google Scholar
  9. Grill, H. J. Sucrose as an aversive stimulus.Neuroscience Abstracts 1975,1 525. (Abstract).Google Scholar
  10. Hacker, D. B., & Miller, E. D. Food patterns of the southwest.American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 1959,7 224–229.Google Scholar
  11. Heiser, C. B., Jr.Nightshades: The paradoxical plants. San Fancisco: W. H. Freeman, 1969.Google Scholar
  12. Jancsó, N. Role of the nerve terminals in the mechanism of inflammatory reactions.Bulletin of the Millard Fillmore Hospital, Buffalo, New York 1960,7 53–77.Google Scholar
  13. Jancsó-Gábor, A., & Szolcsányi, J. The mechanism of neurogenic inflammation. In A. Bertelli & J. C. Houck (Eds.),Inflammation biochemistry and drug interaction. Amsterdam: Excerpta Medica, 1969.Google Scholar
  14. Jancsó-Gábor, A., Szolcsányi, J., & Jancsó, N. Irreversible impairment of thermoregulation induced by capsaicin and similar pungent substances in rats and guinea pigs.Journal of Physiology 1970,206 495–507.Google Scholar
  15. Jelliffe, D. B. Culture, social change, and infant feeding—current trends in tropical regions.American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 1962,10 19–45.Google Scholar
  16. Lee, T. S. Physiological gustatory sweating in a warm climate.Journal of Physiology 1954,124 528–542.Google Scholar
  17. Maga, J. A. Capsicum.CRC Critical Reviews of Food Science and Nutrition 1975,7 177–199.Google Scholar
  18. Moore, F. W. Food habits in non-industrial societies. In J. DuPont (Ed.),Dimensions of nutrition. Boulder, Colorado: Associated Universities Press, 1970.Google Scholar
  19. Pfaffman, C. The pleasures of sensation.Psychological Review 1960,67 253–268.Google Scholar
  20. Pickersgill, B. The domestication of chili peppers. In J. J. Ucko & G. W. Dimbleby (Eds.),The domestication and exploitation of plants and animals. London: Gerald Duckworth, 1969.Google Scholar
  21. Rosengarten, F., Jr.The book of spices. Wynnewood, Pennsylvania: Livingston, 1969.Google Scholar
  22. Rozin, E.The flavor principle cookbook. New York: Hawthorn, 1973.Google Scholar
  23. Rozin, P. Specific aversions as a component of specific hungers.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology 1967,64 237–242.Google Scholar
  24. Rozin, P. The use of characteristic flavorings in human culinary practice. In C. M. Apt (Ed.),Flavor: Its chemical, behavioral and commercial aspects. Proceedings of the Arthur D. Little Flavor Symposium. Boulder, Colorado: Westview, 1978.Google Scholar
  25. Rozin, P. Preference and affect in food selection. In J. H. A. Kroeze (Ed.),Preference behavior and chemoreception. London: Information Retrieval, 1979.Google Scholar
  26. Rozin, P., & Fallon, A. E. The acquisition of likes and dislikes for foods. In J. Solms (Ed.),The role of food components in food acceptance. Zurich: Forster, 1980. (a)Google Scholar
  27. Rozin, P., & Fallon, A. E. A. E.Psychological categorization of foods and nonfoods I: A preliminary taxonomy of food rejections. Unpublished manuscript, 1980. (b)Google Scholar
  28. Rozin, P., Gruss, L., & Berk, G. The reversal of innate aversions: Attempts to induce a preference for chili peppers in rats.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 79,93, 1001–1014.Google Scholar
  29. Rozin, P., Mark, M., & Schiller, D.The role of desensitization in the preference for chili pepper. Unpublished manuscript, 1980.Google Scholar
  30. Sanjur, D. M., Cravioto, J., Rosales, L., & van Veen, A. Infant feeding and weaning practices in a rural preindustrial setting: A sociocultural approach.Acta Paediatrica Scandinavica 1970,Suppl. 200 1–45.Google Scholar
  31. Selby, H..Zapotec deviance. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1974.Google Scholar
  32. Solomon, R. L. An opponent process theory of motivation. IV. The affective dynamics of drug addiction. In J. D. Master & M. E. P. Seligman (Eds.),Psychopathology: Laboratory models. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman, 1977.Google Scholar
  33. Valazquez de Leon, J.Viajando por las cocinas de las provincias de la Republica Mexicana (2nd ed.), Mexico City: Academia de Cocina Velazquez de Leon, 1972.Google Scholar
  34. Whitecotton, J. W.The Zapotecs. Norman, Oklahoma: University of Oklahoma Press, 1977.Google Scholar
  35. Wolowitz, H. M. Food preferences as an index of orality.Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1964,69 650–654.Google Scholar
  36. Young, P. T. Appetite, palatability and feeding habit: A critical review.Psychological Bulletin 1948,45 289–320.Google Scholar
  37. Zajonc, R. B. Attitudinal effects of mere exposure.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1968,9 1–27.Google Scholar
  38. Zuckerman, M. The sensational seeking motive.Progress in Experimental Personality Research 1974,7 79–148.Google Scholar
  39. Zuckerman, M. Sensation seeking. In H. London & J. Exner, Jr. (Eds.),Dimensions of personality. New York: Wiley, 1978.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul Rozin
    • 1
  • Deborah Schiller
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphia

Personalised recommendations