Skip to main content
Log in

Perceived control

A generalized state of motivation

  • Published:
Motivation and Emotion Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Permitting subjects to choose materials to be learned on a task enhances performance on that task. These results support the idea that choice increases the learner's perception of control, thereby enhancing motivation and performance. The purpose of the present experiments was to determine whether choosing responses to be learned on a paired-associate task would also benefit performance on a reaction-time task. Half of the subjects selected their responses to be learned on a paired-associate task while the remaining subjects were assigned responses. In one experiment, subjects then performed both the PA and RT tasks simultaneously, while in the second experiment the RT task was performed following the choice/force procedure. Providing the learner with the opportunity to choose produced a generalized increase in motivation, which resulted in significantly faster responding on the nonchosen RT task. Also discussed are the limitations of the effects of perceived control.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bailey, S. E., Perlmuter, L. C., Karsh, R., & Monty, R. A. Choice for others and the perception of control.Motivation and Emotion 1978,2 191–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brigham, T. A. Some effects of choice on academic performance. In L. C. Perlmuter & R. A. Monty (Eds.),Choice and perceived control. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D.Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraut, A. G., & Smothergill, D. W. A two-factor theory of stimulus-repetition effects.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1978,4 191–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monty, R. A., Geller, E. S., Savage, R. E., & Perlmuter, L. C. The freedom to choose is not always so choice.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory 1979,5 170–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monty, R. A., & Perlmuter, L. C. Persistence of the effects of choice on paired-associate learning.Memory and Cognition 1975,3 183–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monty, R. A., Rosenberger, M. A., & Perlmuter, L. C. Amount and locus of choice as sources of motivation in paired-associate learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology 1973,97 16–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perlmuter, L. C., & Monty, R. A. The importance of perceived control: Fact or fantasy?American Scientist 1977,65 759–765.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perlmuter, L. C., Monty, R. A., & Cross, P. M. Choice as a disrupter of performance in paired-associate learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology 1974,102 170–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perlmuter, L. C., Monty, R. A., & Kimble, G. A. Effect of choice on paired-associate learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology 1971,91 47–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savage, R. E., Perlmuter, L. C., & Monty, R. A. Effect of reduction in the amount of choice and the perception of control on learning. In L. C. Perlmuter & R. A. Monty (Eds.),Choice and perceived control. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, J. D., & Kimble, G. A. The association value of 320 selected words and paralogs.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 1967,6 744–752.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wingfield, A., & Sandoval, A. W. Perceptual processing for meaning. In L. W. Poon, J. L. Fozard, L. S. Cermak, D. Arenberg, & L. W. Thompson (Eds.),New directions in memory and aging: Proceedings of the George Talland Memorial Conference. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This research was supported by the U.S. Army Research Office, Durham, North Carolina, and the U.S. Army Human Engineering Laboratory. This paper may be reproduced in full or in part for any purpose of the United States Government.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Perlmuter, L.C., Scharff, K., Karsh, R. et al. Perceived control. Motiv Emot 4, 35–45 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00995928

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00995928

Keywords

Navigation