Skip to main content
Log in

Influences of cognitive complexity on the dimensions underlying perceptions of the work environment

  • Published:
Motivation and Emotion Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The literature on cognitive processes suggests that individuals differ in the dimensions they use to describe the work environment and thus the behavioral implications they attach to characteristics of that environment. Using the technique described by Bem and Allen (1974), navy enlisted personnel were separated into subgroups with high, medium, and low cognitive complexity scores. Responses about perceived characteristics of the work environment produced six components for the high complexity group versus four for the low group. Questions about supervisor behaviors, role characteristics, and work group interactions yielded similar dimensions for all groups, although differences were found for responses about macroorganizational characteristics. Significant but low relationships were found between complexity scores and global indices of job performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdel-Halim, A., & Rowland, K. Some personality determinants of the effects of participation: A further investigation.Personnel Psychology 1976,29 41–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ace, M. E. Some validity asessments of response inconsistency.Proceedings of the 80th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association 1972,7 1–2. (Summary)

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, C. R. Locus of control, coping behaviors, and performance.Journal of Applied Psychology 1977,62 446–451.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change.Psychological Review 1977,84 191–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bem, D. J., & Allen, A. On predicting some of the people some of the time: The search for cross-situational consistencies in behavior.Psychological Review 1974,81 506–520.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowers, K. S. Situationism in psychology: An analysis and a critique.Psychological Review 1973,80 307–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. P., Dunnette, M. D., Lawler, E. E., III, & Weick, K. E., Jr.Managerial behavior, performance, and effectiveness. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. P., & Pritchard, R. D. Motivation theory in industrial and organizational psychology. In M. D. Dunnette (Ed.),Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Domangue, B. B. Decoding effects of cognitive complexity, tolerance of ambiguity, and verbalnonverbal inconsistency.Journal of Personality 1978,46 519–535.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunham, R. B. Relationships of perceived job design characteristics to job ability requirements and job value.Journal of Applied Psychology 1977,62 760–763.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eden, D., & Leviatan, U. Implicit leadership theory as a determinant of the factor structure underlying supervisory behavior scales.Journal of Applied Psychology 1975,60 736–741.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekehammer, B. Interactionism in personality from a historical perspective.Psychological Bulletin 1974,81 1026–1048.

    Google Scholar 

  • Endler, N. S., & Magnusson, D.Interactional psychology and personality. New York: Wiley, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, S. Explorations in personality today and tomorrow: A tribute to Henry A. Murray.American Psychologist 1979,34 649–653.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, K. M., & Blackman, S. Assessment of cognitive style. In P. McReynolds (Ed.),Advances in psychological assessment (Vol. 4). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorsuch, R. L.Factor analysis. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herman, J. Cognitive processing of persuasive communication.Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 1977,19 126–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hornick, C. W., James, L. R., & Jones, A. P. Empirical item keying versus a rational approach to analyzing a psychological climate questionnaire.Applied Psychological Measurement 1977,1 489–500.

    Google Scholar 

  • Indik, B. P. The scope of the problem and some suggestions toward a solution. In B. P. Indik & F. K. Berrien (Eds.),People, groups, and organizations. New York: Teachers College Press, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Insel, P. M., & Moos, R. H. Psychological environments: Expanding the scope of human ecology.American Psychologist 1974,29 179–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ittelson, W. H., Proshansky, H. M., Rivlin, L. G., & Winkel, G. H.An introduction to environmental psychology. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, L. R., & Jones, A. P. Organizational structure: A review of structural dimensions and their conceptual relationships with individual attitudes and behavior.Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 1976,16 74–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jessor, R., & Jessor, S. L. The perceived environment in behavioral science.American Behavioral Scientist 1973,16 801–828.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, A. P.Cognitive complexity and work environment perceptions. Paper presented to the Summit Conference of Industrial/Organizational Psychologists, San Diego, February 1978.

  • Jones, A. P., & James, L. R. Psychological climate: Dimensions and relationships of individual and aggregated work environment perceptions.Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 1979,23 201–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, A. P., James, L. R., & Bruni, J. R. Perceived leadership behavior and employee confidence in the leader as moderated by job involvement.Journal of Applied Psychology 1975,60 146–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerlinger, F. J., & Pedhazur, E. J.Multiple regression in behavioral research. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • LaFollette, W. R., & Sims, H. P., Jr. Is satisfaction redundant with organizational climate?Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 1975,13 257–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, M. J. Reflections on the cognitive-learning trend in psychotherapy.American Psychologist 1977,32 5–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manis, M. Cognitive social psychology.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 1977,3 550–566.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayes, B. T. Some boundary considerations in the application of motivation models.Academy of Management Review 1978,3 51–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulaik, S. A.The foundations of factor analysis. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne, R. L., & Pugh, D. S. Organizational structure and climate. In M. D. Dunnette (Ed.),Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, K. R. Subject personality as a major experimental artifact: A path analysis approach.Proceedings of the 80th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association 1972,7 251–252. (Abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmid, J., & Leiman, J. The development of hierarchical factor solutions.Psychometrika 1957,22 53–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. Moderator research and the law of small numbers.Personnel Psychology 1978,31 215–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sims, H. P., Jr., & LaFollette, W. An assessment of the Litwin and Stringer organization climate questionnaire.Personnel Psychology 1975,28 19–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, D. Perceptions of similarity between striving tasks and the generality of task preferences.Motivation and Emotion 1977,1 181–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vannoy, J. S. Generality of cognitive complexity-simplicity as a personality construct.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1965,2 385–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wardell, D. M., & Royce, J. R. Toward a multi-factor theory of styles and their relationships to cognition and affect.Journal of Personality 1978,46 474–505.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waters, L. K., Roach, D., & Batlis, N. Organizational climate dimensions and job related attitudes.Personnel Psychology 1974,27 465–476.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This article is Report Number 79-2, supported by Naval Medical Research and Development Command, Department of the Navy, under Research Work Unit MF58.524.022-0011. The views presented are those of the authors. No endorsement by the Department of the Navy has been given or should be inferred.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jones, A.P., Butler, M.C. Influences of cognitive complexity on the dimensions underlying perceptions of the work environment. Motiv Emot 4, 1–19 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00995926

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00995926

Keywords

Navigation