Journal of Medical Systems

, Volume 13, Issue 6, pp 375–383 | Cite as

A strategy for coordination of end-user computing in hospital departments

  • Jeffrey Soar
Articles
  • 26 Downloads

Abstract

This paper discusses issues associated with end-user computing and describes an approach for coordination of departmental end-user computing that was implemented at Concord Hospital, Sydney, Australia. There are a number of pressures for end-user computing. These include the inability of IS departments to provide the services that users require, the increasing spread of computing skills and the advent of the microcomputer. The traditional approaches to computing are discussed and the concern over security explained. The potential benefits of greater involvement of users in systems development and support is discussed. Information systems development needs to be a collaborative activity. At Concord Hospital, a number of departments have responsibility for their own local minicomputer and microcomputer based systems. Coordination of this systems effort was seen as important in order to maximize the benefits of end-user computing while seeking to minimize duplication of effort, data or systems, or security risks.

Keywords

Information System Potential Benefit System Development Traditional Approach System Effort 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bowker, D.G., End-user computing: strategies for success. InThe Australian Computer Society Conference 1987, Proceedings Melbourne, Australian Computer Society, p. 389, 1987.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mumford, E., Participative systems design: Structure and method,Syst. Object. Solut. 1(1):5–19, 1981.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hirschheim, R.A., User experience with and assessment of participative systems design,MIS Quart. (December), 295–304, 1985.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Martin, J., and Hershey III, E. A.,Information Engineering: A Management White Paper Knowledgeware, Atlanta, p. 33, 1986.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Freeman, P., Software development systems. InComputers and People, p. 19, July–August 1987.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Glasson, B.C., and Pervan, G.P., End-user computing issues: an Australian survey. InThe Australian Computer Society Conference 1987, Proceedings. Melbourne, Australian Computer Society, p. 385, 1987.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Eaves, D., Productivity, management attitudes and other questions of survival. InThe Australian Computer Society Conference 1987, Proceedings Melbourne, Australian Computer Society, p. 373, 1987.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gledhill, V., Why your company's MIS is failing. InProfessional Computing, p. 9–11, March 1987.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Glasson, B.C., Guidelines for user participation in the system development process. In B. Schackel, ed,Human-Computer Interaction—Interact '84. Proceedings of the IFIP Conference, London, UK, 4–7 September 1984, North-Holland, Amsterdam, p. 85, 1985.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mumford, E., Land, F., and Hawgood, J., A participative approach to the design of computer systems.Impact Sci. Soc. 28(3):251, 1978.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Canning, R.G., Computer-based training for end-users,EDP Analyzer 21(10):1, October 1983.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jeffrey Soar
    • 1
  1. 1.Concord HospitalSydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations