Motivation and Emotion

, Volume 4, Issue 3, pp 193–216 | Cite as

The impact of moral theories on cheating

Studies of emotion attribution and schema activation
  • Richard A. Dienstbier
  • Lynn R. Kahle
  • Keith A. Willis
  • Gilbert B. Tunnell
Article

Abstract

This research series began as a test of an emotion-attribution approach to moral behavior. However, in the early studies, college students who read about morality were subsequently more likely to cheat on a vocabulary test than were control subjects who read materials irrelevant to morality. We hypothesized that resentment toward the test constructors interacted with the moral schemas activated by the reading task. To reduce resentment, in Study III the vocabulary test was presented as the experimenter's doctoral research. As predicted, compared to controls, those subjects who read about morality cheated less. Study IV was a quasi-experiment that confirmed the hypothesized resentment differences between Study III and the earlier studies. In Study V, while two groups read about morality, one group read an internal emotion-attribution passage and the other read an external version; less cheating was observed in the internal condition than in the external or control conditions. The results indicate that even when moral schemas are elicited under conditions favoring moral behavior, those schemas will lead to reduced cheating most effectively under conditions in which subjects attribute their emotional arousal to their own behavior rather than to external causes. Issues of moral schema activation and emotion-attribution in moral behavior are discussed.

Keywords

Control Subject College Student Social Psychology Internal Condition Emotional Arousal 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Davies, E. This is the way Crete went.Psychology Today 1969,3 42–47.Google Scholar
  2. Dienstbier, R. A. The role of anxiety and arousal attribution in cheating.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 1972,8 168–179. (a)Google Scholar
  3. Dienstbier, R. A. A modified belief theory of prejudice emphasizing the mutual causality of racial prejudice and anticipated belief differences.Psychological Review 1972,79 146–160. (b)Google Scholar
  4. Dienstbier, R. A.An emotion-attribution approach to self-control. Unpublished manuscript, University of Nebraska-Loncoln, 1975.Google Scholar
  5. Dienstbier, R. A., Hillman, D., Lehnhoff, J., Hillman, J., & Valkenaar, M. C. An emotion-attribution approach to moral behavior: Interfacing cognitive and avoidance theories of moral development.Psychological Review 1975,82 299–315.Google Scholar
  6. Dienstbier, R. A., & Munter, P. O. Cheating as a function of the labeling of natural arousal.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1971,17 208–213.Google Scholar
  7. Hays, W. L.Statistics for psychologists. New York: Holt, 1963.Google Scholar
  8. Hoffman, M. L. Moral development. In P. H. Mussen (Ed.),Carmichael's manual of child development (Vol. 2, 3rd ed.). New York: Wiley, 1970.Google Scholar
  9. Kelly, G. A.A theory of personality: The psychology of personal constructs. New York: W. W. Norton, 1955.Google Scholar
  10. Kohlberg, L. A cognitive-developmental analysis of children's sex-role concepts and attitudes. In E. E. Maccoby (Ed.),The development of sex differences. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1966.Google Scholar
  11. Langer, E. J., & Abelson, R. P. The semantics of asking a favor: How to succeed in getting help without really dying.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1972,24 26–32.Google Scholar
  12. Mandler, G.Mind and emotion. New York: Wiley, 1975.Google Scholar
  13. Nisbett, R. E., & Ross, L.Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings. New York: Prentice Hall, 1980.Google Scholar
  14. Page, M. M. Postexperimental assessment of awareness in attitude conditioning.Education and Psychological Measurement 1971,31 891–906.Google Scholar
  15. Piaget, J.The origins of intelligence in children. (M. Cook, transl.) New York: International University Press, 1952.Google Scholar
  16. Schachter, S., & Latane, B. Crime, cognition, and the autonomic nervous system. In D. Levine (Ed.),Nebraska symposium on motivation (Vol. 12). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1964. Pp. 221–272.Google Scholar
  17. Schachter, S., & Singer, J. E. Cognitive, social, and physiological determinants of emotional state.Psychological Review 1962,69 379–399.Google Scholar
  18. Schank, R., & Abelson, R.Scripts, plans, goals, and understanding. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum, 1977.Google Scholar
  19. Schwartz, S. Normative influecnes on altruism. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.),Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 10). New York: Academic Press, 1976.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard A. Dienstbier
    • 1
  • Lynn R. Kahle
    • 1
  • Keith A. Willis
    • 1
  • Gilbert B. Tunnell
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of Nebraska-Lincoln

Personalised recommendations