Skip to main content
Log in

One of the basic tendencies in the automation of testing

  • Published:
Measurement Techniques Aims and scope

Conclusions

  1. 1.

    In deciding whether it is expedient to produce commercially universal RS setters, it is advisable to make a comparative analysis of the labor consumed by the nominal components of various testing methods.

  2. 2.

    An analysis of the EMI development trends confirms the advisability of using RSS equipment with a high degree of universality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature cited

  1. A. M. Kipnis, Izmeritel. Tekh., No. 3 (1968).

  2. A. I. Ilyukovich and V. R. Shul'man, Izmeritel. Tekh., No. 1 (1964).

  3. L. F. Kulikovskii, A. M. Melik-Shakhnazarov, B. A. Rabinovich, and B. A. Seliber, Galvanometric Compensators [in Russian], Énergiya, Moscow (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  4. V. V. Oreshnikov, Method for Automatizing the Testing of Mass-Produced Direct-Reading Electrical Measuring Instruments, Dissertation (1965).

  5. S. P. Éskin, Development and Investigation of Methods and Reference Equipment for the Automatic Testing of dc Indicating Electrical Measuring Instruments, Author's abstract of dissertation (1968).

Download references

Authors

Additional information

Translated from Izmeritel'naya Tekhnika, No. 7, pp. 13–16, July, 1969.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tavrovskii, V.P. One of the basic tendencies in the automation of testing. Meas Tech 12, 899–902 (1969). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00995323

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00995323

Keywords

Navigation