References
Berk, R.A., (Ed.). (1984).A guide to criterion-referenced test construction. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Bloom, B.S. (1964).Stability and Change in Human Characteristics. NY: John Wiley.
Brandt, R. (1991). Does “more is less” apply to funding?Educational Leadership, 48(8), 3.
Bridge, G.R., Judd, C.M., & Moock, P.R. (1979).The Determinants of Educational Outcomes: The Impact of Families, Peers, Teachers, and Schools, Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Publishing Company.
Brown, B., & Saks, D. (1975). The production and distribution of cognitive skills within schools.Journal of Political Economy, 83(3), 571–593.
Brown, B. & Saks, D. (1978). An econometric perspective on classroom reading instruction. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the International Reading Association, Houston, TX, May.
Brown, B., & Saks, D. (1980). Production technologies and resource allocations within schools: Theory and measurement. In Robert Dreeben & J. Alan Thomas (Eds.),The Analysis of Educational Productivity, Volume I: Issues in Microanalysis. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Publishing Company, 53–118.
Brown, B, & Saks, D. (1981). The microeconomic of schooling. In D.C. Berliner (Ed.),Review of Research in Education, vol. 9. Washington, D.C.: AERA, 209–254.
Brown, B, & Saks, D. (1983). The microeconomic of schooling: How does the allocation of time affect learning and what does it reveal about preferences. Paper presented at The Meeting of the Econometric Society, San Francisco.
Brown, B., & Saks, D. (1984). An economic view of the acquisition of reasoning skills: Agenda for research in the information age.Review of Educational Research, 54(4), 560–576.
Brown, B., & Saks, D. (1987). The microeconomic of the allocation of teachers' time and student learning.Economics of Education Review, 6(4), 319–332.
Carnegie Task Force on Teaching as a Profession. (1986).A. nation prepared: Teachers for the twentyfirst century. New York: Carnegie Forum on Education and the Economy.
Cohen, S.A. (1987). Instructional alignment: Searching for a magic bullet.Educational Researcher, 16(8), 16–20.
Deno, S.L. (1985). Curriculum-based measurement: The emerging alternative.The Council for Exceptional Children, 219–239.
Geiselman, R., Woodward, J., & Beatty, J. (1982). Individual differences in verbal memory performance: A test of alternative information processing modelsJournal of Experimental Psychology: General, 111, 109–134.
Glass, G.V. (1974). Teacher effectiveness. In Herbert J., Walberg (Ed.),Evaluating educational performance. Berkeley, CA: McCutchen, 11–32.
Haertel, E. (1986). The valid use of student performance measures for teacher evaluationEducational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 8(1), 45–60.
Hanushek, E.A. (1978). A reader's guide to educational production functions. Paper presented at the National Invitational Conference on School Organization and Effects, San Diego, CA, January 27–29.
Hill, P. & McGaw, B. (1981). Testing the simplex assumptions underlying Bloom's taxonomy.American Educational Research Journal, 18, 93–101.
Joreskog, K., & Sorbom, D. (1979).Advances in Factor Analysis and Structural Equation Models. Cambridge, MA: Abt Books.
Kerlinger, F.N. (1986).Foundations of Behavioral Research (3rd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
Levin H. (1974). Measuring efficiency in educational production.Public Finance Quarterly, 2(1), 3–23.
Madaus, G.F., Kellaghan, T., Rakow, E.A., & King, D.J. (1979). The sensitivity, of measures of school effectiveness.Harvard Educational Review, 49, (2), 207–230.
Meherns, W.A., & Phillips S.E. (1986). Detecting impacts of curricular differences in achievement test data.Journal of Educational Measurement, 23(3), 185–196.
Millman, J. (1981). Student achievement as a measure of teaching competence. In Jason Millman (Ed.),Handbook of teacher evaluation, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
Niedermeyer, F.C., & Yelon, S. (1981). Los Angeles aligns instruction with essential learning skills.Educational Leadership, 38, 618–620.
Quinto, F., & McKenna, B. (1977).Alternatives to standardized testing. Washington, DC: National Education Association.
Redfield, D.L. (1988). Pupil achievement: The weakest link in the evaluation chain. In William J. Gephart & Jerry B. Ayers (Eds.),Teacher education evaluation, Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 112–131.
Renier, J. (1990). Business helping schools; schools helping business. Speech presented to Conference of The Council of the Great City Schools, Boston, MA., October, 10.
Schalock, H.D., Schalock, M., Cowart, B., & Myton, D. (In Press). Extending teacher assessment beyond knowledge and skills: An emerging focus on teacher accomplishments.Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education.
Schalock, H.D., Schalock, M., Myton D., & Girod, J. (In press). Focusing on learning gains by pupils taught: A central feature of Oregon's outcome-based approach to the initial preparation and licensure of teachers.Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education.
Schalock, M., Schalock, H.D., & Edwards, J. (In Press) Extending teacher assessment and professional development beyond knowledge and skills: Applying student learning gains to a faculty incentive/reward program.Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education.
Schalock, M.D. (1987). Teacher productivity: What is it? How might it be measured? Can it be warranted?Journal of Teacher Education, 37(5), 59–62.
Summers, A. & Wolfe, B. (1977). Do schools make a difference?American Economic Review, 67(4), 639–652.
Walberg, H.J. (1981). A psychological theory of educational productivity. In Frank H. Farley & Neal J. Gordon (Eds.),Psychology and Education: The State of the Union, Berkeley, CA: McCutchen, 81–108.
Walberg, H.J. (1990). Enhancing school productivity: The research base. In Pedro Reyes, (Ed.),Teachers and Their Workplace: Commitment, Performance and Productivity. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schalock, M.D., Cowart, B. & Staebler, B. Teacher productivity revisited: Definition, theory, measurement, and application. J Pers Eval Educ 7, 179–196 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00995302
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00995302