Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education

, Volume 7, Issue 2, pp 105–133 | Cite as

Extending teacher assessment beyond knowledge and skills: An emerging focus on teacher accomplishments

  • H. Del Schalock
  • Mark D. Schalock
  • Bill Cowart
  • David Myton


Personnel Management Teacher Assessment Teacher Accomplishment 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Berk, R.A. (Ed.) (1984).A guide to criterion-referenced test construction. Baltimore, MD. Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Berliner, D.C. (1986). On the expert teacher: A conversation with David Berliner.Educational Leadership, October, 4–9.Google Scholar
  3. Brookover, W.B., Brady, C., Flood, P., Schweitzer, J., & Wisenbaker, J. (1979).School social systems and student achievement: Schools can make a difference New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  4. Brophy, J.F., & Evertson, D.M. (1976)Learning from teaching: A developmental perspective. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  5. Carnegie Task Force on Teaching as a Profession. (1986).A nation prepared: Teachers for the twentyfirst century. New York: Carnegie Forum on Education and the Economy.Google Scholar
  6. Cohen, S.A. (1987). Instructional alignment Searching for a magic bullet.Educational Researcher, 16(8), 16–20.Google Scholar
  7. Corno, L., & Snow, R.E. (1986). Adapting teaching to individual differences among learners. In M.C. Wittrock (Ed.),Third handbook of research on teaching, NY: Macmillan, 605–629.Google Scholar
  8. Darling-Hammond, L. (1988). The future of teaching.Educational Leadership, 46(3), 4–10.Google Scholar
  9. Darling-Hammond, L., Wise, A.E., & Pease, S.R. (1983). Teacher Evaluation in the organizational context: A review of the literature.Review of Educational Research, 53(3), 285–328.Google Scholar
  10. Deno, S.L. (1985). Curriculum-based measurement: The emerging alternative.The Council for Exceptional Children, 219–239.Google Scholar
  11. Doyle, W. (1986). Classroom organization and management. In M.C. Wittrock (Ed.),Third handbook of research on teaching. NY: Macmillan, 392–431.Google Scholar
  12. Ellson, D. (1986). Improving productivity in teaching.Phi Delta Kappan, 68(2), 111–124.Google Scholar
  13. Feiman, S., & Floden, R.E. (1980). A consumer's guide to teacher development.Journal of Staff Development, 1(2), 126–147.Google Scholar
  14. Finn, E.C. (1990). The biggest reform of all.Phi Delta Kappan, 71(8), 585–592.Google Scholar
  15. Fisher, D.W., Filby, N.N., Marliave, R., Cohen, L.S., Dishaw, M., Moore, J.E., & Berliner, D.C. (1978).Final report of the beginning teacher evaluation study. Technical Report J-1. San Francisco: Far West Laboratory for Educational Research and Development.Google Scholar
  16. Fry, B.V., & Ahern, C. (1988).Handbook for the review of district instructional personnel assessment systems, Tallahassee, FL: Florida Department of Education.Google Scholar
  17. Fry, B.V., & Fardig, G.E. (Eds.) (1987).A guide for designing teacher assessment systems. Tallahassee, FL: Florida Department of Education.Google Scholar
  18. Fry, B.V., & Meehan, K.J. (1989).Teacher assessment system profile report. Tallahassee, FL. Florida Department of Education.Google Scholar
  19. Fullan, M., and Miles, M. (1992). Getting reform right: What works and what doesn't.Phi Delta Kappan, 73(10), 744–752.Google Scholar
  20. Glass, G.V. (1974). Teacher effectiveness. In Herbert J. Walberg (Ed.),Evaluating educational performance, Berkeley, CA: McCutchen, 11–32.Google Scholar
  21. Good, T.L., & Brophy, J.E. (1986). School effects. In M.C. Wittrock (Ed.),Third handbook of research on teaching, New York: Macmillan, 507–604.Google Scholar
  22. Haertel, E. (1986). The valid use of student performance measures for teacher evaluation.Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 8(1), 45–60.Google Scholar
  23. Herman, J.L., Aschbacher, P.R., & Winters, L. (1992).A practical guide to alternative assessment. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.Google Scholar
  24. Holmes Group. (1986).Tomorrow's teachers. East Lansing, MI.Google Scholar
  25. Howsam, R., Corrigan, D., Denemark, G., & Nash, R. (1976).Educating a profession. Washington, D.C.: American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education.Google Scholar
  26. Iwanicki, E.F. (1991). Making the pieces fit: Teacher evaluation, school evaluation, staff development.Issues and practices in performance assessment, 1–38. Tampa, FL: Florida Department of Education.Google Scholar
  27. Lara, A.V., & Medley, D.M. (1987). Effective teacher behavior as a function of learner ability.Professional School Psychology, 2(1), 15–33.Google Scholar
  28. Leinhardt, G. (1992). What research on learning tells us about teaching.Educational Leadership, 49(7), 20–25.Google Scholar
  29. Lieberman, A. (Ed.) (1988).Building a professional culture in the school. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  30. Lieberman, A., & Miller, L. (1984).Teachers, their world and their work: Implications for school improvement. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.Google Scholar
  31. Mandeville, G.K., & Anderson, L.W. (1987). The stability of school effectiveness indices across grade levels and subject areas.Journal of Educational Measurement, 24(3), 203–216.Google Scholar
  32. McGreal, T., as reported by Ron Brandt. (1987). On teacher evaluation: A conversation with Tom McGreal.Educational Leadership, 44(7), 20–24.Google Scholar
  33. Medley, D.M. (1982).Teacher competency testing and the teacher educator. Charlottesville: Association of Teacher Educators and the Bureau of Educational Research, University of Virginia.Google Scholar
  34. Millman, J. (1987). Student achievement as a measure of teaching competence. In Jason Millman (Ed.),Handbook of teacher education. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  35. Murray, S.L. (1986).Considering policy options for testing teachers. Contact 400-86-006. Portland, OR: Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory.Google Scholar
  36. NASDTEC Outcome-Based Standards and Portfolio Assessment. (1992) Draft of outcome-based teacher education standards for the elementary and middle levels. Boston, NASDTEC Annual Conference.Google Scholar
  37. National Board for Professional teaching Standards (1989).Toward high and rigorous standards for the teaching profession: Initial policies and perspectives. Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  38. National Commission for Excellence in Teacher Education. (1985).A call for change in teacher education. Washington, DC: American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education.Google Scholar
  39. National Council for the Accreditation of Teacher Education. (1986).Standards, procedures, policies for the accreditation of professional teacher education units. Washington, DC: NCATE.Google Scholar
  40. National Governor's Association. (1987).Time for results. Washington, DC: NCA.Google Scholar
  41. Niedermeyer, F.C., & Yelon, S. (1981). Los Angeles aligns instruction with essential learning skills.Educational Leadership, 38, 618–620.Google Scholar
  42. Olson, L. (1992b). To sell vision of student mastery Oregon fights finances, skepticism.Education Week, June 10, 16, & 18.Google Scholar
  43. Oregon Board of Education. (1992).Oregon educational act for the 21st century Salem, OR: 8 pages.Google Scholar
  44. Peterson, K. (1987). Teacher evaluation with multiple and variable lines of evidence.American Educational Research Journal, 24(2), 311–317.Google Scholar
  45. Popham, W.J. (1988). A trial-revision paradigm for the development of defensible teacher tests. In Leslie J. Fyans, Jr. (Ed.).Test validity for job certification and licensure. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  46. Quinto, F., & McKenna, B. (1977).Alternatives to standardized testing. Washington, DC: National Education Association.Google Scholar
  47. Redfield, D.L. (1988). Pupil achievement: The weakest link in the evaluation chain. In William J. Gephart & Jerry B. Ayers (Eds.),Teacher education evaluation. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 112–131.Google Scholar
  48. Reynolds, M.C. (Ed.) (1989).Knowledge base for the beginning teacher. Oxford, England: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  49. Rosenholtz, S.J. (1989).Teacher's workplace: The social organization of schools. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
  50. Rutter, M. (1983). School effects on pupil progress: Research findings and policy implications. In L.S. Shulman, & G. Dykes (Eds.),Handbook of teaching and policy. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
  51. Sarason, S. (1990).The predictable failure of educational reform. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar
  52. Schalock, H.D. (1970). The focus of performance-based certification: Knowledge, teaching behavior, or the products that derive from a teacher's behavior. Procedures of the Conference on Performance-Based Certification, Florida State Department of Education, May, Miami Beach.Google Scholar
  53. Schalock, H.D. (1974). The impact of competency definition on teacher preparation institutions.Education Leadership, January, 318–321.Google Scholar
  54. Schalock, H.D. (1979a). Research on teacher selection. In D.C. Berliner (Ed.),Annual review of research in education. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association, 364–417.Google Scholar
  55. Schalock, H.D. (1979b). The assessment of competence: Problems and issues. In R. Nickse & L. McClure (Eds.),Competency based education: Beyond minimum competency testing. Portland, OR: Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory, 248–295.Google Scholar
  56. Schalock, H.D. (1983). Methodological considerations in future research and development in teacher education. In K. Howey & W. Gardner (Eds.),The education of teachers: A look ahead. NY: Longman, 38–73.Google Scholar
  57. Schalock, H.D. (1987). The central issue in teacher warranties: Quality assurance for what?Journal of Teacher Education, 38(5), 52–58.Google Scholar
  58. Schalock, H.D. (1988). Teacher selection: A problem of admission criteria, certification criteria or prediction of job performance? In William J. Gephart & Jerry B. Ayers (Eds.),Teacher education evaluation Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1–22.Google Scholar
  59. Schalock, H.D. (1988). Student learning: The professional touchstone for teachers and teacher educators. Paper presented at the Far West Regional Meeting of the Holmes Group, Boulder, CO.Google Scholar
  60. Schalock, H.D., & Myton, D.V. (1988). A new paradigm for teacher licensure: Oregon's demand for evidence of success in fostering learning.Journal of Teacher Education, 39(6), 8–16.Google Scholar
  61. Schalock, M.D. (1987). Teacher productivity: What is it? How might it be measured? Can it be warranted?Journal of Teacher Education, 37(5), 59–62.Google Scholar
  62. Shavelson, R.J., Webb, N.W., & Burstein, L. (1986). Measurement of teaching. In M.C. Wittrock (Ed.),Handbook of research on teaching. New York: Macmillan, 55–91.Google Scholar
  63. Shulman, L.S. (1987a). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform.Harvard Education Review, 57(1), 1–22.Google Scholar
  64. Shulman, L.S. (1987b). Assessment for teaching: An initiative for the profession.Phi Delta Kappan, 69(1), 38–44.Google Scholar
  65. Slavin, R. (1989). PET and the pendulum: Faddism in education and how to stop it.Phi Delta Kappan, 70(10), 752–758.Google Scholar
  66. Southern Regional Education Board (1985).Improving teacher education: An agenda for higher education and the schools. Atlanta, GA.Google Scholar
  67. Southern Regional Education Board. (1986). Major reports on teacher education: What do they mean for the states?Regional Spotlight,15(1).Google Scholar
  68. Spady, W. (1982). Outcome-based instructional management: A sociological perspective.The Australian Journal of Education, 26, 123–143.Google Scholar
  69. Spady, W.G., & Marshall, K.T. (1991). Beyond traditional outcome-based education.Educational Leadership, 49(2), 67–72.Google Scholar
  70. Sprinthall, N.A., & Thies-Sprinthall, L. (1983). The teacher as an adult learner: A cognitivedevelopmental view. In G.A. Griffen (Ed.),Staff development: 82nd yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  71. Stiggins, R.J. (1986). Teacher evaluation: Accountability and growth systems: different purposes.National Association of Secondary School Principals Bulletin, 70(490), 51–58.Google Scholar
  72. Stiggins, R.J., & Bridgeford, N.J. (1985). Performance assessment for teacher development.Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 7(1), 85–97.Google Scholar
  73. Teacher Standards and Practices Commission. (1988).Oregon administrative rules. (Div. 1–52). Salem, OR: TSPC.Google Scholar
  74. Vorwerk, K.E., & Gorth, W.P. (1986). Common themes in teacher certification testing program development and implementation. In W.P. Gorth & M.L. Chernoff (Eds.),Testing for teacher certification, 35–43.Google Scholar
  75. Wiggins, G. (1992). Creating tests worth taking.Educational Leadership, 49(8), 26–34.Google Scholar
  76. Wittrock, M.C., (Ed.) (1986).Third Handbook of research on teaching. NY: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. Del Schalock
    • 1
  • Mark D. Schalock
    • 2
  • Bill Cowart
    • 3
  • David Myton
    • 4
  1. 1.Teaching Research DivisionWestern Oregon State CollegeMonmouth
  2. 2.Teaching Research DivisionWestern Oregon State CollegeMonmouth
  3. 3.Western Oregon State CollegeMonmouth
  4. 4.Oregon Teacher Standards and Practices CommissionSalem

Personalised recommendations