Skip to main content
Log in

Attentional consequences of outcome-related motivational states: Congruent, incongruent, and focusing effects

  • Published:
Motivation and Emotion Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Two experiments employed a game context to examine the effects of positive and negative feedback on the processing of targets varying in incentive properties. While half the targets carried no value, the others were assigned either a positive incentive value (where points could be gained) or a negative value (where points could be lost), and either a large incentive size (worth 5 points) or a small size (worth 2 points). Feedback from the previous trial was found to exert three effects on subsequent targets. A congruent effect appeared in the faster processing of large targets that matched the positive or negative valence of the previous feedback signal. An incongruent effect was evident in the delays in shifting attention from pretarget cues that contrasted in valence to the previous feedback. A focusing effect was reflected in the general delays following negative feedback in responding to targets with no value. In addition to these outcome influences, processing was generally more efficient for targets carrying positive than negative incentive value, and for targets of large than small size. These findings are discussed in terms of contemporary models of motivation and information processing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bacon, S. J. (1974). Arousal and the range of cue utilization.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 102 81–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaney, P. H. (1986). Affect and memory: A review.Psychological Bulletin, 99 229–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bower, G. H. (1981). Mood and memory.American Psychologist, 36 129–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandt, J. L., Derryberry, D., & Reed, M A. (1992).Failure and attentional narrowing. Unpublished manuscript.

  • Derryberry, D. (1988). Emotional influences on evaluative judgments: Roles of arousal, attention, and spreading activation.Motivation and Emotion, 12 23–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derryberry, D. (1989). Effects of goal-related motivational states on the spatial orienting of attention.Acta Psychologica, 72 199–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derryberry, D. (1991). The immediate effects of positive and negative feedback signals.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61 267–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derryberry, D., & Reed, M. A. (1993).Attentional components of temperament: Orienting toward and away from positive and negative signals. Manuscript submitted for publication.

  • Derryberry, D., & Tucker, D. M. (1991). The adaptive base of the neural hierarchy: Elementary motivational controls on network function. In R. Dienstbier (Ed.),Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (Vol. 26, pp. 289–342). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derryberry, D., & Tucker, D. M. (in press). Motivating the focus of attention. In P. Niedenthal & S. Kitayama (Eds.),The heart's eye: Emotional influences in perception and attention. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

  • Easterbrook, J. A. (1959). The effect of emotion on cue utilization and the organization of behaviour.Psychological Review, 66 183–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eriksen, C. W., & Yeh, Y. (1985). Allocation of attention in the visual field.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 11 583–597.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossberg, S., & Schmajuk, H. A. (1987). Neural dynamics of attentionally modulated Pavlovian conditioning: Conditioned reinforcement, inhibition, and opponent processing.Psychobiology, 15 195–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hockey, R. (1979). Stress and the cognitive components of skilled performance. In V. Hamilton & D. M. Warburton (Eds.),Human stress and cognition: An information processing approach (pp. 141–177). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hope, D. A., Rapee, R. M., Heimberg, R. G., & Dombeck, M. J. (1990). Representations of the self in social phobia: Vulnerability to social threat.Cognitive Therapy and Research, 14 177–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isen, A. M., & Daubman, K. A. (1984). The influence of affect on categorization.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47 1206–1217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isen, A. M., & Geva, N. (1987). The influence of positive affect on acceptable level of risk and thoughts about losing: The person with a large canoe has a large worry.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 39 145–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isen, A. M., Johnson, M., Mertz, E., & Robinson, G. (1985). The influence of positive affect on the unusualness of word associations.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48 1413–1426.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isen, A. M., Nygren, T. E., & Ashby, F. G. (1988). Influence of positive affect on the subjective utility of gains and losses: It is just not worth the risk.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55 710–717.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isen, A. M., Rosenzweig, A. S., & Young, M. J. (1991). The influence of positive affect on clinical problem solving.Medical Decision Making, 11 221–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, E., & Tversky, A. (1983). Affect, generalization, and the perception of risk.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45 20–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decisions under risk.Econometrika, 47 263–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • La Berge, D., Tweedy, J. R., & Ricker, J. (1967). Selective attention: Incentive variables and choice time.Psychonomic Science, 8 341–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loftus, G. R. (1972). Eye fixation and recognition memory for pictures.Cognitive Psychology, 3 525–551.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackie, D. M., & Worth, L. T. (1989). Processing deficits and the mediation of positive affect in persuasion.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57 27–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacLeod, C., & Mathews, A. (1988). Anxiety and the allocation of attention to threat.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 40 653–670.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manstead, A. S. R., Wagner, H. L., & MacDonald, C. J. (1983). A contrast effect in judgments of emotional state.Motivation and Emotion, 7 279–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathews, A. (1990). Why worry? The cognitive function of anxiety.Behavioural Research and Therapy, 28 455–468.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maitlin, M. W., & Stang, D. J. (1978).The pollyanna principle: Selectivity in language, memory, and thought. Cambridge, MA: Schenkman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mikulincer, M., Kedem, P., & Paz, D. (1990). Anxiety and categorization—1. The structure and boundaries of mental categories.Personality and Individual Differences, 11 805–814.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mischel, W., Ebbesen, E., & Zeiss, A. (1976). Determinants of selective memory about the self.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 44 92–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nygren, T. E., & Isen, A. M. (1985).Examining probability estimation: Evidence for dual subjective probability functions. Paper presented at the Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Boston, MA.

  • Posner, M. I. (1978).Chronometric explorations of mind. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Posner, M. I., Inhoff, A. W., Friedrich, F. J., & Cohen, A. (1987). Isolating attentional systems: A cognitive-anatomical analysis.Psychobiology, 15 107–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Postman, L., & Brown, D. R. (1952). The perceptual consequences of success and failure.Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 47 213–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratto, F., & John, O. P. (1991). Automatic vigilance: The attention-grabbing power of negative social information.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61 380–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rinck, M., Glowalla, U., & Schneider, K. (1992). Mood-congruent and mood-incongruent learning.Memory and Cognition, 20 29–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothbart, M. K., & Derryberry, D. (1981). Development of individual differences in temperament. In M. E. Lamb & A. L. Brown (Eds.),Advances in developmental psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 37–86). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, W., & Detweiler, M. (1987). A connectionist/control architecture for working memory. In G. H. Bower (Eds.),The psychology of learning and motivation (pp. 54–121). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, E. D., Mann, J. J., Stokes, P. E., & Manevitz, Z. (1986). Effects of lithium carbonate on associative productivity and idiosyncrasy in bipolar outpatients.American Journal of Psychiatry, 143 1166–1169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toates, F. M. (1983). Exploration as a motivational and learning system: A cognitive incentive view. In J. Archer & L. I. A. Birke (Eds.),Exploration in animals and humans (pp. 55–71). Workingham, England: Van Nostrand Reinhold (UK).

    Google Scholar 

  • Watts, F. N., McKenna, F. T., Sharrock, R., & Trezise, L. (1986). Color naming of phobic-related words.British Journal of Psychology, 77 97–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wise, R. A. (1987). Sensorimotor modulation and the variable action pattern (VAP): Toward a noncircular definition of drive and motivation.Psychobiology, 15 7–20.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Derryberry, D. Attentional consequences of outcome-related motivational states: Congruent, incongruent, and focusing effects. Motiv Emot 17, 65–89 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00995186

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00995186

Keywords

Navigation