Advertisement

Journal of Family Violence

, Volume 3, Issue 1, pp 15–27 | Cite as

Husbands who harm: Predicting spousal violence by men

  • Marilyn J. Howell
  • Karen L. Pugliesi
Article

Abstract

Previous research on spouse abuse has frequently focused on bivariate relationships between theoretically derived variables and marital violence. This study utilizes a multivariate approach in order to explore the independent and combined effects of several variables derived from the social learning and the frustration/strain perspectives on self-reported violence by husbands against wives. Data for married and/or cohabiting males are derived from a national stratified random sample of couples in the United States. Loglinear analysis is used to identify the main and interactive effects of age, occupational status, employment status, subjective economic strain, and observation of parental violence on reports of violence toward one's wife. Results indicate that age, occupational status, parental modeling and employment status affect the likelihood of violence. Employment status more strongly increases the likelihood of violence for younger men, as opposed to older men, which supports the strain perspective. The independent effect of the observation of parental violence lends support to the social learning approach. Social policy implications are discussed.

Key words

spouse abuse wife abuse social learning economic strain marital violence 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Dobash, R. E., and Dobash, R. (1979).Violence against Wives, The Free Press, New York.Google Scholar
  2. Fagan, J. A., Stewarst, D., and Hansen, K. V. (1983). Violent men or violent husbands? Background factors and situational correlates. In Finkelhor, D., Gelles, R. J., Hotaling, G. T., and Straus, M. A. (eds.),The Dark Side of Families: Current Family Violence Research, Sage, Beverly Hills, pp. 49–67.Google Scholar
  3. Farrington, K. M. (1980). Stress and family violence. In Strauss, M. A., and Hotaling, G. T. (eds.),The Social Causes of Husband-Wife Violence, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, pp. 94–114.Google Scholar
  4. Gelles, R. J. (1980). Violence in the family: A review of research in the seventies.J. Marr. Fam. 873–885.Google Scholar
  5. Gentemann, K. M. (1984). Wife-beating: Attitudes of a non-clinical population.Victimology, 9: 109–119.Google Scholar
  6. Goodman, L. A. (1972). A modified multiple regression approach to the analysis of dichotomous variables.Am. Sociological Rev. 37: 28–46.Google Scholar
  7. Holt, D. (1979). Log-linear models for contingency table analysis: On the interpretation of the parameters.Sociological Methods Res. 7: 330–336.Google Scholar
  8. Jansen, R. (1978). Battered women and the law.Victimology 34: 585–590.Google Scholar
  9. Long, J. (1984). Estimable functions in log-linear models.Sociological Methods Res. 12: 399–432.Google Scholar
  10. Prescott, S., and Letko, C. (1977). Battered women: A social psychological perspective. In Roy, M. (ed.),Battered Women: A Psychosociological Study of Domestic Violence, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, pp. 72–96.Google Scholar
  11. Stark, R., and J. McEvoy, J. II (1970). Middle class violence.Psychology Today, 3: 52–65.Google Scholar
  12. Steinmetz, S. K. (1977). Wifebeating, husbandbeating —A comparison of the use of physical violence between spouses to resolve marital fights. In M. Roy (ed.),Battered Women: A Psychosociological Study of Domestic Violence, Van Nostrand Reinhold, pp. 63–72.Google Scholar
  13. Straus, M. A. (1973). A general systems theory approach to a theory of violence between family members.Social Sci. Inf., 12: 105–125.Google Scholar
  14. Straus, M. A., Gelles, R. J., and Steinmetz, S. (1980).Behind Closed Doors: Violence in the American Family, Anchor Press/Doubleday, Garden City, N.Y.Google Scholar
  15. Sutherland, E. H., and Cressey, D. R. (1974).Criminology, (ninth edition), Lippincott, Philadelphia, Pa.Google Scholar
  16. Walker, L. E. (1983). The battered woman syndrome study. In Finkelhor, D., Gelles, R. J., Hotaling, T., and Straus, M. A. (eds.),The Dark Side of Families: Current Family Violence Research, Sage, Beverly Hills, pp. 31–48.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marilyn J. Howell
    • 1
  • Karen L. Pugliesi
    • 2
  1. 1.Trinity CollegeBurlington
  2. 2.State University of New York-PlattsburghPlattsburgh

Personalised recommendations