Skip to main content
Log in

Brand inequalities in the loyalty-effects of purchases

  • Published:
Marketing Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Choice models in marketing have generally included the effects of loyalty on individual choice behavior.Loyalty has been typically measured as proportion of purchases or as an exponentially smoothed index of past purchases. An underlying assumption of both measures is that all brands gain the same increase in loyalty with a purchase. However, such an assumption may not hold when the competing brands are not comparable. We propose a new exponential smoothing measure which incorporates brand-specific parameters for the loyalty effects of purchases. A choice model, calibrated on individual level data for the detergent category, is used to compare the proposed measure with its traditional version. This comparison reveals that the new approach improves both the fit and predictive performance of the choice model. The results also suggest that the loyalty effects of purchases are likely to be lower for brands which are purchased on price promotions and higher for expensive brands.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bucklin, Randolph E., and Sunil Gupta. (1992). “Brand Choice. Purchase Incidence, and Market Segmentation: An Integrated Approach,”Journal of Marketing Research 29 (May), 201–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabor, Andre, and Clive W. J. Granger. (1966). “Price as an Indicator of Quality: Report of an Enquiry,”Economica 33 (February), 43–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guadagni, Peter M., and John D. C. Little. (1983). “A Logit Model of Brand Choice Calibrated on Scanner Data,”Marketing Science 2 (Summer), 203–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, Sunil. (1988). “Impact of Sales Promotions on When. What and How Much to Buy,”Journal of Marketing Research 25, 342–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber, Joel, and John McCann. (1982). “The Impact of Inferential Beliefs on Product Evaluations.”Journal of Marketing Research 19 (August), 324–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacoby, Jacob. (1971). “A Model of Multi-Brand Loyalty,”Journal of Advertising Research 11, 25–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krishnamurthi, Lakshman, and S. P. Raj. (1988). “A Model of Brand Choice and Purchase Quantity Price Sensitivities,”Marketing Science 7 (Winter), 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krishnamurthi, Lakshman. (1991). “An Empirical Analysis of the Relationship Between Brand Loyalty and Consumer Price Elasticity,”Marketing Science 10 (Spring), 172–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lattin, James B. (1987). “A Model of Balanced Choice Behavior,”Marketing Science 6 (Winter), 48–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortmeyer, Gwen, James M. Lattin, and David B. Montgomery. (1991). “Individual Differences in Response to Consumer Promotions,”International Journal of Research in Marketing 8, 169–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasan, V., and Thomas Kibarian. (1990). “Purchase Event Feedback: Fact or Fiction?” Paper presented at Marketing Science Conference (March 22–25). University of Illinois, Champaign-Urbana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tellis, Gerard. (1988). “Advertising Exposure, Loyalty and Brand Choice: A Two-Stage Model of Choice.”Journal of Marketing Research 25 (May), 134–144.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Papatla, P. Brand inequalities in the loyalty-effects of purchases. Marketing Letters 4, 361–368 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00994354

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00994354

Key words

Navigation