Skip to main content
Log in

Single cell responses of the Douglas-fir beetle,Dendroctonus pseudotsugae hopkins (Coleoptera: Scolytidae), to pheromones and host odors

  • Published:
Journal of Chemical Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Olfactory perception of pheromones and host odors byDendroctonus pseudotsugae males and females was investigated through single cell recordings. Responses of 71 cells (35 cells in males; 36 cells in females) were recorded to 1 μg of 10 pheromones and three host terpenes. The olfactory cells were classified into four types based on sensitivity and specificity for the various odors: (1) 3,2-MCHone (3-methyl-2-cyclohexenone) cells; (2) 3,2-MCHol (3-methyl-2-cyclohexenol) cells; (3) frontalin cells; and (4) synergist cells. 3,2-MCHone and 3,2-MCHol cells in both males and females were the most sensitive and specific of all cells recorded with a threshold ca. 0.001–0.01 μg on filter paper. Frontalin cells were less specialized than the two aforementioned cell types and had a somewhat higher threshold of ca. 0.01 μg. A larger percentage of these three cell types were recorded in males than in females. The synergist cells had the highest threshold of all recorded cell types and were the least specific. Each of these cells was most responsive to eithercis-verbenol,trans-verbenol, 1,2-MCHol, verbenone, α-pinene, or limonene; however, responses could be elicited by stimulation with other pheromones or host terpenes at higher dosages. Instances of inhibition of nerve impulse activity from spontaneously active cells were observed during 3,2-MCHol and 3,2-MCHone stimulation, thus suggesting multifunctional effects for these compounds. The results help explain the role of chemicals in host selection, aggregation, and colonization behavior of the beetle and further elucidate hypotheses put forth in an earlier electroantennogram study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Boeckh, J. 1962. Elektrophysiologische Untersuchungen an einzelnen Geruchs-Rezeptoren auf den Antennen des Totengrabers (Necrophorus, Coleoptera).Z. Vergl. Physiol. 46:212–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borden, J.H. 1982. Aggregation pheromones, pp. 74–139,in J.B. Mitton and K.B. Sturgeon (eds.). Bark Beetles in North American Conifers. University of Texas Press, Austin, Texas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cates, R.G., andAlexander, H. 1982. Host resistance and susceptibility, pp. 212–263,in J.B. Mitton and K.B. Sturgeon (eds.). Bark Beetles in North American Conifers. University of Texas Press, Austin, Texas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cotman, C.W., andMcGaugh, J.L. 1980. Behavioral Neuroscience. Academic Press, New York, xvi + 838 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickens, J.C. 1979. Electrophysiological investigations of olfaction in bark beetles.Mitt. Schweiz. Entomol. Ges. 52:203–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickens, J.C., andPayne, T.L. 1977. Bark beetle olfaction: Pheromone receptor system inDendroctonus frontalis.J. Insect Physiol. 23:481–489.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickens, J.C., andPayne, T.L. 1978. Structure and function of the sensilla on the antennal club of the southern pine beetle,Dendroctonus frontalis (Zimmerman) (Coleoptera: Scolytidae).Int. J. Insect Morphol. Embryol. 7:251–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickens, J.C., Gutmann, A., Payne, T.L., Ryker, L.C., andRudinsky, J.A. 1983. Antennal olfactory responsiveness of the Douglas-fir beetle,Dendroctonus pseudotsugae Hopkins (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) to pheromones and host odors.J. Chem. Ecol 9:1383–1395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furniss, M.M., Kline, L.N., Schmitz, R.F., andRudinsky, J.A. 1972. Tests of three pheromones to induce or disrupt aggregation of Douglas-fir beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) on live trees.Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 65:1227–1232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jantz, O.K., andJohnsey, R.L. 1964. Determination of sex of the Douglas-fir beetleDendroctonus pseudotsugae Hopkins (Coleoptera: Scolytidae).Can. Entomol. 96:1327–1329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaissling, K.-E., andPriesner, E. 1970. Die Riechschwelle des Seidenspinners.Naturwissenschaften 57:23–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, B., andMiledi, R. 1973. The effect of α-bungarotoxin on acetylcholine receptors.Br. J. Pharmacol. 49:138–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinzer, G.W., Fentiman, A.F., Jr., Foltz, R.L., andRudinsky, J.A. 1971. Bark beetle attractants: 3-methyl-3-cyclohexen-l-l one isolated fromDendroctonus pseudotsugae.J. Econ. Entomol. 64:970–971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinzer, G.W., Fentiman A.F., Jr., Page, T.F., Jr., Foltz, R.L., Vité, J.P., andPitman, G.B. 1969. Bark beetle attractants: Identification, synthesis and field bioassay of a new compound isolated fromDendroctonus.Nature 221:477–488.

    Google Scholar 

  • Libbey, L.M., Morgan, M.E., Putman, T.B., andRudinsky, J.A. 1976. Isomer of antiaggregative pheromone identified from male Douglas-fir beetle: 3-Methylcyclohex-3-en-1-one.J. Insect Physiol. 22:871–873.

    Google Scholar 

  • Libbey, L.M., Oehlschlager, A.C., andRyker, L.C. 1983. l-Methylcyclohex-2-en-1-ol as an aggregation pheromone ofDendroctonus pseudotsugae.J. Chem. Ecol. 9:1533–1541.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mustaparta, H. 1979. Chemoreception in bark beetles of the genusIps; Synergism, inhibition and discrimination of enantiomers, pp. 147–158,in F.J. Ritter (ed.). Chemical Ecology: Odour Communication in Animals. Elsevier/North-Holland Biomedical Press.

  • Mustaparta, H., Angst, M.E., andLanier, G.N. 1979. Specialization of olfactory cells to insect- and host-produced volatiles in the beetleIps pini (Say).J. Chem. Ecol. 5:109–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitman, G.B., andVité, J. P. 1970. Field response ofDendroctonus pseudotsugae (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) to synthetic frontalin.Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 63:661–664.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudinsky, J.A. 1966a. Scolytid beetles associated with Douglas-fir: Response to terpenes.Science 152:218–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudinsky, J.A. 1966b. Host selection and invasion by the Douglas-fir beetle,Dendroctonus pseudotsugae Hopkins, in coastal Douglas-fir forests.Can. Entomol. 98:98–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudinsky, J.A. 1969. Masking of the aggregationpheromone in Dendroctonus pseudotsugae Hopk.Science 166:884–885.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudinsky, J.A. 1973. Multiple function of Douglas-fir beetle pheromone 3-methyl-2-cyclo-hexen-1-one.Environ. Entomol. 2:580–585.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudinsky, J.A., andMichael, R.R. 1972. Sound production in the Scolytidae: Chemostimulus of sonic signal by the Douglas-fir beetle.Science 175:1386–1390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudinsky, J.A., andRyker, L.C. 1977. Olfactory and auditory signals mediating behavioral patterns of bark beetles. Colloques Internationaux du C.N.R.S. No. 265. Comportement des Insectes et Milieu Trophique, pp. 196–209.

  • Rudinsky, J.A., Kinzer, G.W., Fentiman, A.F., Jr., andFoltz, 1972.Trans-verbenol isolated from Douglas-fir beetle: Laboratory and field bioassays in Oregon.Environ. Entomol. 1:485–488.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudinsky, J. A., Morgan, M.E., Libbey, L.M., andPutnam, T.B. 1974. Additional components of the Douglas-fir beetle (Col., Scolytidae) aggregative pheromone and their possible utility in pest control.Z. Angew. Entomol. 76:65–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudinsky, J.A., Ryker, L.C., Michael, R.R., Libbey, L.M., andMorgan, M.E. 1976a. Sound production in Scolytidae: Female sonic stimulus of male pheromone release in twoDendroctonus beetles.J. Insect Physiol. 22:1675–1681.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudinsky, J.A., Morgan, M.E., Libbey, L.M., andPutnam, T.B. 1976b. Release of frontalin by male Douglas-fir beetle.Z. Angew. Entomol. 81:267–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudinsky, J.A., Morgan, M.E., Libbey, L.M., andPutnam, T.B. 1977. Limonene released by the scolytid beetleDendroctonus pseudotsugae.Z. Angew. Entomol. 82:376–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryker, L.C., Libbey, L.M., andRudinsky, J.A. 1979. Comparison of volatile compounds and stridulation emitted by the Douglas-fir beetle from Idaho and western Oregon populations.Environ. Entomol. 8:789–798.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vité, J.P., Pitman, G.B., Fentiman, A.F., Jr., andKinzer, G.W. 1972. 3-Methyl-2-cyclohexenl-ol isolated fromDendroctonus.Naturwissenschaften 59:469.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Rudloff, E. 1972. Chemosystematic studies in thegenuspseudotsuga. I. Leaf oil analysis of the coastal and Rocky Mountain varieties of the Douglas fir.Can. J. Bot. 50:1025–1040.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wadhams, L.J., Angst, M.E., andBlight, M.M. 1982. Responses of the olfactory receptors ofScolytus scolytus (F.) (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) to the stereoisomers of 4-methyl-3-heptanol.J. Chem. Ecol. 8:477–492.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J.A. 1979. Principles of Animal Physiology. Macmillan, New York, xviii + 891 pp.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Texas Agricultural Experiment Station Paper NumberTA-18689. This research was supported in part by McIntire-Stennis Project 1525, the U.S. Department of Agriculture-sponsored program entitled “The Expanded Southern Pine Beetle Research and Applications Program” through TAES-SEA-CR grant 904-15-4, and NSF grant PCN 79-21708 to Oregon State University. The findings, opinions and recommendations expressed herein are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the U.S. Department of Agriculture. All programs and information of the Texas Agricultural Experiment Station are available without regard to race, ethnic origin, religion, sex or age.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dickens, J.C., Payne, T.L., Ryker, L.C. et al. Single cell responses of the Douglas-fir beetle,Dendroctonus pseudotsugae hopkins (Coleoptera: Scolytidae), to pheromones and host odors. J Chem Ecol 10, 583–600 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00994223

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00994223

Key words

Navigation