Journal of Chemical Ecology

, Volume 17, Issue 4, pp 767–777 | Cite as

Aversive responses of white-tailed deer,Odocoileus virginianus, to predator urines

  • Robert K. Swihart
  • Joseph J. Pignatello
  • Mary Jane I. Mattina
Article

Abstract

We tested whether predator odors could reduce winter browsing of woody plants by white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus). Urine from bobcats (Lyra rufus) and coyotes (Canis latrans) significantly reduced browsing of Japanese yews (Taxus cuspidata), and repellency was enhanced when urine was reapplied weekly as a topical spray. Urine of cottontail rabbits (Sylvilagus floridanus) and humans did not reduce damage, suggesting that deer do not respond aversively to odors of nonpredatory mammals or occasional predators with which they lack a long evolutionary association. Bobcat and coyote urine were more effective in tests conducted with eastern hemlock (Tsuga canadensis), which is less palatable to white-tailed deer than Japanese yew. A dichloromethane extract of bobcat urine was as effective as unextracted urine in reducing damage to hemlocks. Testing of the organic components of bobcat urine, particularly the volatile components, may enable identification of the compounds responsible for the repellency we observed.

Key Words

bobcat browsing Canis latrans coyote Lynx rufus Odocoileus virginianus predator urine repellent semiochemicals white-tailed deer wildlife damage Taxus cuspidata Tsuga canadensis 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson, J.P., Jr. 1984. Deer damage in Connecticut.Conn. Conserv. Assoc. Rep, 10:1–12.Google Scholar
  2. Baines, D.A.,Faulkes, C.G.,Tomlinson, A.J., andNing, P.C.Y. 1988. European Pat. Appl. EP 280, 443.Google Scholar
  3. Bolles, R.C. 1970. Species specific defense reactions and avoidance learning.Psychol. Rev. 77: 32–48.Google Scholar
  4. Brinck, C., Erlinge, S., andSandell, M. 1983. Anal sac secretion in mustelids.J. Chem. Ecol. 9:727–745.Google Scholar
  5. Bullard, R.W., Leiker, T.J., Peterson, J.E., andKilburn, S.R. 1978a. Volatile components of fermented egg, an animal attractant and repellent.J. Agric. Food Chem. 26:155–159.Google Scholar
  6. Bullard, R.W., Shumake, S.A., Campbell, D.L., andTurkowski, F.J. 1978b. Preparation and evaluation of a synthetic fermented egg coyote attractant and deer repellent.J. Agric. Food Chem. 26:160–163.Google Scholar
  7. Conover, M.R. 1984. Effectiveness of repellents in reducing deer damage in nurseries.Wildl. Soc. Bull. 12:399–404.Google Scholar
  8. Conover, M.R., andKania, G.S. 1988. Browsing preference of white-tailed deer for different ornamental species.Wildl. Soc. Bull. 16:175–179.Google Scholar
  9. Conover, W.J. 1980. Practical Nonparametric Statistics, 2nd ed. John Wiley & Sons, New York.Google Scholar
  10. Crump, D.R. 1980a. Thietanes and dithiolanes from the anal gland of the stoat (Mustela erminea).J. Chem. Ecol. 6:341–347.Google Scholar
  11. Crump, D.R. 1980b. Anal gland secretion of the ferret (Mustela putorius formafuro). J. Chem. Ecol. 6:837–844.Google Scholar
  12. Frelich, L.E., andLorimer, C.G. 1985. Current and predicted long-term effects of deer browsing in hemlock forests in Michigan, USA.Biol. Conserv. 34:99–120.Google Scholar
  13. Fulk, G.W. 1972. The effect of shrews on the space utilization of voles.J. Mammal. 53:461–478.Google Scholar
  14. Graham, S.A. 1954. Changes in northern Michigan forests from browsing by deer.Trans. North Am. Wildl. Conf. 19:526–533.Google Scholar
  15. Gorman, M.L. 1984. The response of prey to stoat (Mustela erminea) scent.J. Zool. (London) 202:419–423.Google Scholar
  16. Hall, E.R. 1981. The Mammals of North America, 2nd ed. John Wiley & Sons, New York.Google Scholar
  17. Jorgenson, J.W., Novotny, M., Carmack, M., Copland, G.B., Wilson, S.R., andWhitten, W.K. 1978. Chemical scent constituents in the urine of the red fox (Vulpes vulpes L.) during the winter season.Science 119:797–798.Google Scholar
  18. Katsma, D.E., andRusch, D.H. 1979. Evaluation of deer damage in mature apple orchards, pp. 123–142, in J.R. Beck (ed.). Test Methods for Vertebrate Pest Control and Management Materials. American Society for Testing and Materials Standard Technical Publication 680, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
  19. Kurtèn, B., andAnderson, E. 1980. Pleistocene Mammals of North America. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  20. Larson, T.J., Rongstad, O.J., andTerbilcox, F.W. 1978. Movement and habitat use of whitetailed deer in southcentral Wisconsin.J. Wildl. Manage. 42:113–117.Google Scholar
  21. Marston, M.A. 1942. Winter relations of bobcats to white-tailed deer in Maine.J. Wildl. Manage. 6:328–337.Google Scholar
  22. Marchinton, R.L., andHirth, D.H. 1984. Behavior, pp. 129–168,in L.K. Halls (ed.). Whitetailed Deer Ecology and Management. Stackpole Books, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
  23. Mattina, M.J.I., Pignatello, J.J., andSwihart, R.K. 1991. Identification of the volatile components of bobcat (Lynx rufus) urine.J. Chem. Ecol. 17:451–462.Google Scholar
  24. Mech, L.D. 1984. Predators and predation, pp. 189–200,in L.K. Halls (ed.). White-tailed Deer Ecology and Management. Stackpole Books, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
  25. Melchiors, M.A., andLeslie, C.A. 1985. Effectiveness of predator fecal odors as black-tailed deer repellents.J. Wildl. Manage. 49:358–362.Google Scholar
  26. Müller-Schwarze, D. 1972. Responses of young black-tailed deer to predator odors.J. Mammal. 53:393–394.Google Scholar
  27. Müller-Schwarze, D. 1974. Olfactory recognition of species, groups, individuals, and physiological states among mammals, pp. 316–326,in M.C. Birch (ed.). Pheromones. North Holland, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  28. Nash, G.B. 1974. Red, White, and Black: The Peoples of Early America. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.Google Scholar
  29. Palmer, W.L., Wingard, R.G., andGeorge, J.L. 1983. Evaluation of white-tailed deer repellents.Wildl. Soc. Bull. 11:164–166.Google Scholar
  30. Phillips, M., Forshey, C.G., White, G.B., andRichmond, M.E. 1987. The economic impact of wildlife damage on Hudson Valley orchards.Proc, East. Wildl. Damage Control Conf. 3:66–82.Google Scholar
  31. Preti, G., Muetterties, E.L., Furman, J.M., Kennelly, J.J., andJohns, B.E. 1976. Volatile constituents of dog (Canis familiaris) and coyote (Canis latrans) anal sacs.J. Chem. Ecol. 2:177–186.Google Scholar
  32. Purdy, K.G., Siemer, W.F., Pomerantz, G.A., andBrown, T.L. 1987. Deer damage control preferences and use decisions of New York orchardists.Proc. East. Wildl. Damage Control Conf. 3:118–127.Google Scholar
  33. Scott, J.D., andTownsend, T.W. 1985. Methods used by selected Ohio growers to control damage by deer.Wildl. Soc. Bull. 13:234–240.Google Scholar
  34. Severinghaus, C.W., andCheatum, E.L. 1956. Life and times of the white-tailed deer, pp. 57–186,in W.P. Taylor (ed.). The Deer of North America. Stackpole Books, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
  35. Shumake, S.A. 1977. The search for applications of chemical signals in wildlife management, pp. 357–376,in D. Müller-Schwarze and M.M. Mozell, (eds.). Chemical Signals in Vertebrates. Plenum, New York.Google Scholar
  36. Stoddart, D.M. 1980. The Ecology of Vertebrate Olfaction. Chapman and Hall, New York.Google Scholar
  37. Sullivan, T.P. 1986. Influence of wolverine (Gulo gulo) odor on feeding behavior of snowshoe hares (Lepus americanus).J. Mammal. 67:385–388.Google Scholar
  38. Sullivan, T.P., andCrump, D.R. 1984. Influence of mustelid scent-gland compounds on suppression of feeding by snowshoe hares (Lepus americanus).J. Chem. Ecol. 10:1809–1821.Google Scholar
  39. Sullivan, T.P., andCrump, D.R. 1986. Feeding responses of snowshoe hares (Lepus americanus) to volatile constituents of red fox (Vulpes vulpes) urine.J. Chem. Ecol. 12:729–739.Google Scholar
  40. Sullivan, T.P., Nordstrom, L.O., andSullivan, D.S. 1985a. Use of predator odors as repellents to reduce feeding damage by herbivores. I. Snowshoe hares (Lepus americanus).J. Chem. Ecol. 11:903–919.Google Scholar
  41. Sullivan, T.P., Nordstrom, L.O., andSullivan, D.S. 1985b. Use of predator odors as repellents to reduce feeding damage by herbivores. II. Black-tailed deer (Odocoileus hemionus columbianus).J. Chem. Ecol. 11:921–935.Google Scholar
  42. Sullivan, T.P., Crump, D.R., andSullivan, D.S. 1988a. Use of predator odors as repellents to reduce feeding damage by herbivores. III. Montane and meadow voles (Microtus montanus andMicrotus pennsylvanicus).J. Chem. Ecol. 14:363–377.Google Scholar
  43. Sullivan, T.P., Crump, D.R., andSullivan, D.S. 1988b. Use of predator odors as repellents to reduce feeding damage by herbivores. IV. Northern pocket gophers (Thomomys talpoides).J. Chem. Ecol. 14:379–389.Google Scholar
  44. Sullivan, T.P., Crump, D.R., Wieser, H., andDixon, E.A. 1990a. Response of pocket gophers (Thomomys talpoides) to an operational application of synthetic semiochemicais of stoat (Mustela erminea).J. Chem. Ecol. 16:941–949.Google Scholar
  45. Sullivan, T.P., Crump, D.R., Wieser, H., andDixon, E.A. 1990b. Comparison of release devices for stoat (Mustela erminea) semiochemicais used as montane vole (Microtus montanus) repellents.J. Chem. Ecol. 16:951–957.Google Scholar
  46. Swihart, R.K. 1991. Modifying scent-marking behavior to reduce woodchuck damage to fruit trees.Ecol. Appl. 1:98–103.Google Scholar
  47. Swihart, R.K., andConover, M.R. 1990. Reducing deer damage to yews and apple trees: Testing Big Game RepellentR, Ro·pelR, and soap as repellents.Wildl. Soc. Bull. 18:156–162.Google Scholar
  48. Westall, R.G. 1953. The amino acids and other ampholytes of urine.Biochem. J. 55:244–248.Google Scholar
  49. Wheeler, J.W. 1976. Properties of compounds used as chemical signals, pp. 61–70,in D. Müller-Schwarze and M.M. Mozell (eds.). Chemical Signals in Vertebrates. Plenum, New York.Google Scholar
  50. Wilson, S.R., Carmack, M., Novotny, M., Jorgenson, J.W., andWhitten, W.K. 1978. Isopentenyl methyl sulfide. A new terpenoid in the scent mark in the red fox (Vulpes vulpes).J. Org. Chem. 43:4675–4676.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert K. Swihart
    • 1
  • Joseph J. Pignatello
    • 2
  • Mary Jane I. Mattina
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Plant Pathology and EcologyThe Connecticut Agricultural Experiment StationNew Haven
  2. 2.Department of Soil and WaterThe Connecticut Agricultural Experiment StationNew Haven
  3. 3.Department of Analytical ChemistryThe Connecticut Agricultural Experiment StationNew Haven

Personalised recommendations