Skip to main content
Log in

The duo-gland adhesive system of the archiannelidsProtodrilus andSaccocirrus and the turbellarianMonocelis

  • Published:
Zoomorphologie Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The duo-gland adhesive systems in three archiannelids(Protodrilus sp.,Saccocirrus sonomacus andS. eroticus) and one turbellarian(Monocelis cincta) were studied by scanning and transmission electron microscopy.Protodrilus attaches to the substrate by the posterior margin of its bilobed and dorso-ventrally flattened pygidium.Saccocirrus also adheres by a bilobed pygidium, but each lobe is ovoid in transverse section, and its median-ventral surface is divided into numerous ridges. Adhesive glands open along the crest of each ridge.Saccocirrus also adheres along bands of adhesive structures that encircle each body segment.Monocelis attaches to the substrate by a crescent shaped area at the posterior margin of the ventral surface. Although the external morphology of the adhesive area is different in each species examined, the basic cellular organization is similar. The adhesive areas contain two types of glands named viscid and releasing. The viscid glands produce granules (0.8–2.0 μm long) that are thought to contain the adhesive that binds the worm to surfaces. The releasing glands secrete granules (0.15–0.2 μm in diameter) that are believed to break the attachment. The releasing granules are identical to those described in other species, whereas the viscid granules have a variety of complex substructures unlike any described previously. The possible homology of the adhesive systems in the archiannelids and those in other taxa with duo-glands is discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen, R.D.: Evidence for firm linkages between microtubules and membrane-bounded vesicles. J. Cell Biol.64, 497–503 (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, H.: A review of some factors affecting settlement and adhesion in the cyprids of some common barnacles. In: Adhesion in biological systems (R.S. Manly, ed.), pp. 89–121. New York: Academic Press 1970

    Google Scholar 

  • Boaden, P.J.S.: Water movement—a dominant factor in interstitial ecology. Sarsia34, 125–136 (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaet, A.B.: Invertebrate adhering surfaces: secretions of the starfish,Asterias forbesi, and the coelenterate,Hydra pirardi. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci.118, 921–929 (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, R.B.: Dynamics of metazoan evolution. Oxford: Claredon Press 1964

    Google Scholar 

  • Crezee, M., Tyler, S.:Hesiolicium gen. n. (Turbellaria, Acoela) and observations on its ultrastructure. Zool. Scr.5, 207–216 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, L.E.: Histological and ultrastructural studies of the basal disc ofHydra. I. The glandulomuscular cells. Z. Zellforsch.139, 1–28 (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickson, M.R., Mercer, E.H.: Fine structure of the pedal gland ofPhilodina roseola (Rotifer). J. Microsc. (Paris)5, 81–90 (1966)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraipont, J.: Le genrePolygordius. Fauna u Flora Neapel13, 1–125 (1887)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, J.S.: A new species ofSaccocirrus (Archiannelida) from the west coast of North America. Pac. Sci.23, 238–251 (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, G.: Subcellular particles in echinoderm tube feet, II. Class Holothuroidea. J. Ultrastr. Res.23, 124–133 (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hermans, C.O.: Systematic position of the Archiannelida. Syst. Zool.18, 85–102 (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hulings, N.C., Gray, J.S.: A manual for the study of meiofauna. Smithson. Contrib. Zool. 78 (1971)

  • Hunt, S.: Fine structure of the secretory epithelium in the hypobranchial gland of the prosobranch gastropod molluscBuccinum undatum L. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. U.K.53, 59–71 (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  • Karling, T.G.: Marine Turbellaria from the Pacific Coast of North America. IV. Coelogynoporidae and Monocelididae. Ark. Zool.18, 493–528 (1966)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lippens, P.L.: Ultrastructure of a marine nematode,Chromadorina germanica (Beutschli, 1874). I. Anatomy, cytology of the caudal gland apparatus. Z. Morphol. Tiere78, 181–192 (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, G.G.:Saccocirrus sonomacus, n. sp., a new archiannelid from California. Trans. Am. Microsc. Soc.96, 97–103 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, D., Tilney, L.G.: The role of microtubules in the movement of pigment granules in teleost melanophores. J. Cell Biol.61, 757–779 (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  • Oschman, J.L.: Microtubules in the subepidermal glands ofConvoluta roscoffensis (Acoela, Turbellaria). Trans. Am. Microsc. Soc.86, 159–162 (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen, K.J.: Cytological and cytochemical observations on the mucous gland cells of an acoel turbellarian,Convoluta convoluta. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci.118, 930–965 (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  • Riedl, R.M.: How much seawater passes through sandy beaches? Int. Rev. Ges. Hydrobiol.56, 923–946 (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  • Singla, C.L.: Fine structure of the adhesive pads ofGonionemus vertens. Cell Tiss. Res.181, 395–402 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterrer, W.: On some species ofAustrognatharia, Pterognathia andHaplognathia nov. gen. from the North Carolina coast (Gnathostomulida). Int. Rev. Ges. Hydrobiol.55, 371–385 (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  • Tamarin, A.: An ultrastructural study of byssus stem formation inMytilus califorianus. J. Morphol.145, 151–178 (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  • Teuchert, G.: Organisation und Fortpflanzung vonTurbanella cornuta (Gastrotricha). Institut für den Wissenschaftlichen Film, Film C1176, pp. 3–16 (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, S.: Comparative ultrastructure of adhesive systems in the Turbellaria and other interstitial animals. Ph.D. thesis, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (1975)

  • Tyler, S.: Comparative ultrastructure of adhesive systems in the Turbellaria. Zoomorphologie84, 1–76 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, S.: Ultrastructure and systematics: an example from turbellarian adhesive organs. Mikrofauna Meeresboden61, 271–286 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

I acknowledge the support of a NIH grant to Professor Richard M. Eakin, the use of the facilities of the Electron Microscope Laboratory at Berkeley, the assistance of Drs. Ralph I. Smith and Beth Burnside in the preparation of this paper, and the critical reading of the manuscript by Drs. Richard M. Eakin and Colin O. Hermans

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Martin, G.G. The duo-gland adhesive system of the archiannelidsProtodrilus andSaccocirrus and the turbellarianMonocelis . Zoomorphologie 91, 63–75 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00994154

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00994154

Keywords

Navigation