The desirability of control

Abstract

The psychological construct of desirability of control was related to several theoretical statements (e.g., Kelley, 1971; White, 1959) and areas of current research (e.g., Glass & Singer, 1972; Deci, 1975) in psychology. A scale designed to measure individual differences in the general level of motivation to control the events in one's life was presented. The Desirability of Control Scale was found to have substantial internal consistency (.80) and test-retest reliability (.75), as well as discriminant validity from measures of locus of control (Rotter, 1966) and social desirability (Crowne & Marlowe, 1960). The results of an “illusion of control” study (cf. Langer, 1975) provided construct validation: only subjects high in the desire for control displayed a belief in personal control over chance outcomes. Construct validation was also provided from studies on learned helplessness and hypnosis. The practical, as well as theoretical, value of the instrument was discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Adler, A. Individual psychology. In C. Murchinson (Ed.),Psychologies of 1930. Worcester, Massachusetts: Clark University Press, 1930.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ayeroff, F., & Abelson, R. P. ESP and ESB: Belief in personal success at mental telepathy.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1976,34 240–247.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brehm, J. W.A theory of psychological reactance. New York: Academic Press, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Burger, J. M.Desirability of control and hypnotic susceptibility. Manuscript submitted for publication, 1979.

  5. Burger, J. M., & Arkin, R. M. Prediction, control, and learned helplessness.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, in press.

  6. Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitraitmultimethod matrix.Psychological Bulletin 1959,56 82–105.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Crowne, D. P., & Marlowe, D. A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology.Journal of Consulting Psychology 1960,24 349–354.

    Google Scholar 

  8. deCharms, R.Personal causation. New York: Academic Press, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Deci, E. L.Intrinsic motivation. New York: Plenum Press, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Glass, D. C., & Singer, J. E.Urban stress. New York: Academic Press, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hiroto, D. S., & Seligman, M. E. P. Generality of learned helplessness in man.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1975,31 311–327.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kelley, H. H.Attribution in social interaction. Morristown, New Jersey: General Learning Press, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kelly, G. A.The psychology of personal constructs. New York: Norton, 1955.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Langer, E. J. The illusion of control.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1975,32 311–328.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Langer, E. J., & Roth, J. Heads I win, tails it's chance: The illusion of control as a function of the sequence of outcomes in a purely chance task.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1975,32 951–955.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Maccoby, E. E., & Jacklin, C. N.The psychology of sex differences. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Miller, W. R., & Seligman, M. E. P. Depression and learned helplessness in man.Journal of Abnormal Psychology 1975,84 228–238.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Nunnally, J. C.Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Rotter, J. B. Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement.Psychological Monographs, 1966,80(1, Whole No. 609).

  20. Seligman, M. E. P.Helplessness. San Francisco: Freeman, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Strickland, L. H., Lewicki, R. J., & Katz, A. M. Temporal orientation and perceived control as determinants of risk-taking.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 1966,2 143–151.

    Google Scholar 

  22. White, R. Motivation reconsidered: The concept of competence.Psychological Review 1959,66 297–330.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Worchel, S., & Brehm, J. W. Effects of threats to attitudinal freedom as a function of agreement with the communicator.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1970,14 18–22.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Wortman, C. B. Some determinants of perceived control.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1975,31 282–294.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jerry M. Burger.

Additional information

This research was facilitated by National Science Foundation grant BNS78-08834 to Harris Cooper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Burger, J.M., Cooper, H.M. The desirability of control. Motiv Emot 3, 381–393 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00994052

Download citation

Keywords

  • Internal Consistency
  • Individual Difference
  • Social Psychology
  • Construct Validation
  • General Level