Advertisement

Motivation and Emotion

, Volume 3, Issue 4, pp 373–379 | Cite as

Coactor's behavior and imitative aggression

  • Edgar C. O'Neal
  • Peter J. McDonald
  • Cindy Cloninger
  • Douglas Levine
Article

Abstract

After being exposed to either an aggressive or a nonaggressive filmed model, four- and five-year-old boys were tested for imitation while either alone or with a confederate who had also seen the film. The confederate's behavior was either inactive, the same as that in the film, the same as that in the film the child had not seen, novel but of the same category (aggressive or nonaggressive) as that in the film seen, or novel but in the category of the film not seen. These conditions conformed to the dimensions of a 2 × 6 factoral design. According to prediction, the imitation of subjects exposed to the aggressive model was greatest when the confederate's behavior was similar to the model's. No difference in imitation was produced by the confederate's actions if the boy had watched the nonaggressive model. The results were interpreted within the context of social comparison theory.

Keywords

Social Psychology Factoral Design Social Comparison Comparison Theory Social Comparison Theory 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bandura, A., Ross, D., & Ross, S. Transmission of aggression through imitation of aggressive models.Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 1961,63 575–582.Google Scholar
  2. Bandura, A., Ross, D., & Ross, S. Imitation of film-mediated aggressive models.Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 1963,66 3–11.Google Scholar
  3. Borden, R. Witnessed aggression: Influence of an observer's sex and values on aggressive responding.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1975,31 567–583.Google Scholar
  4. Festinger, L. A theory of social comparison processes.Human Relations 1954,7 117–140.Google Scholar
  5. Hicks, D. J. Effects of co-observer's sanctions and adult presence on imitative aggression.Child Development 1968,39 303–309.Google Scholar
  6. Jones, E. E., & Davis, K. E. From acts to dispositions: The attribution process in person perception. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.),Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2). New York: Academic Press, 1965.Google Scholar
  7. Jones, E. E., Davis, K. E., & Gergen, K. J. Role playing variations and their informational value for person perception.Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 1961,63 302–310.Google Scholar
  8. Liebert, R., & Baron, R. A. Some immediate effects of televised violence on children's behavior.Developmental Psychology 1972,6 469–475.Google Scholar
  9. O'Carroll, M., O'Neal, E., & McDonald, P. Influence upon imitative aggression of an imitating peer.Journal of Social Psychology 1977,101 313–314.Google Scholar
  10. O'Neal, E., McDonald, P., Hori, R., & McClinton, B. Arousal and imitation of aggression.Motivation and Emotion 1977,1 93–100.Google Scholar
  11. Stein, A., & Friedrich, L. Aggressive and prosocial television programs and the natural behavior of preschool children.Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 1973,38(4, Whole No. 151).Google Scholar
  12. Steuer, F., Applefield, J., & Smith, R., Televised aggression and the interpersonal aggression of preschool children.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 1971,11 442–447.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • Edgar C. O'Neal
    • 1
  • Peter J. McDonald
    • 2
  • Cindy Cloninger
    • 1
  • Douglas Levine
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyTulane UniversityNew Orleans
  2. 2.North Georgia CollegeUSA

Personalised recommendations