Skip to main content
Log in

Incorporating heterogeneous adoption rates in new product diffusion: A model and empirical investigations

  • Published:
Marketing Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents a stochastic model of the adoption process for durables that explicitly incorporates heterogeneity in adoption rates among the consumers. The model assumes that the individual adoption times follow the Weibull distribution. Heterogeneity in adoption rates is represented by the gamma distribution. The resulting Burr distribution is more general than the Bass model, fits data as well as the Bass model estimated using OLS regression, and has parameters that can be used to make inferences about individual adoption behavior without being influenced by spurious aggregation effects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bass, Frank M. (1969). “A New Product Growth Model for Consumer Durables,”Management Science 15 (January): 215–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee, Rabikar, and Jehoshua Eliashberg (1990). “Innovative Diffusion Process: A Micro-Modeling Approach,”Management Science 36 (September), 1057–1079.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubey, Satya D. (1968). “A Compound Weibull Distribution,”Naval Research Logistics Quarterly 15, 179–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easingwood, Christopher J., Vijay Mahajan, and Eitan Muller. (1983). “A Nonuniform Influence Innovation Diffusion Model of New Product Acceptance,”Marketing Science 2 (Summer): 273–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lattin, James M., and John H. Roberts. (1989). “Modeling the Role of Risk-Adjusted Utility in the Diffusion of Innovations,” Working Paper 1019, Graduate School of Business, Stanford University.

  • Mahajan, Vijay, Charlotte H. Mason, and V. Srinivasan. (1986). “An Evaluation of Estimation Procedures for New Product Diffusion Models.” In Vijay Mahajan and Yoram Wind, (eds.),Innovation Diffusion Models of New Product Acceptance, Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahajan, Vijay, Eitan Muller, and Frank M. Bass. (1990). “New Product Diffusion Models in Marketing: A Review and Directions for Research,”Journal of Marketing 54 (January): 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahajan, Vijay, and Robert A. Peterson. (1985).Models for Innovative Diffusion. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahajan, Vijay, and Yoram Wind. (1986).Innovation Diffusion Models of New Product Acceptance. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, Paul L. (1970).Introductory Probability and Statistical Applications, 2nd ed. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, Donald G., and David C. Schmittlein. (1980). “Jobs, Strikes and Wars: Probability Models for Duration,”Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 25, 224–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oren, Shmuel S., and Rick G. Schwartz. (1988). “Diffusion of New Products in Risk-Sensitive Markets,”Journal of Forecasting 7 (October–December): 273–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmittlein, David C., and Vijay Mahajan. (1982). “Maximum Likelihood Estimation for an Innovation Diffusion Model of New Product Acceptance,”Marketing Science 1 (Winter): 57–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmittlein, David C., and Donald G. Morrison. (1983). “Modeling and Estimation Using Job Duration Data,”Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 32: 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasan, V., and Charlotte H. Mason. (1986). “Nonlinear Least Squares Estimation of New Product Diffusion Models,”Marketing Science 5 (Spring): 169–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sultan, Fareena, John U. Farley, and Donald R. Lehmann. (1990). “A Meta-Analysis of Diffusion Models,”Journal of Marketing Research 22 (February): 70–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaupel, James W., and Anatoli I. Yashing. (1985). “Heterogeneity's Ruses: Some Surprising Effects of Selection on Population Dynamics,”The American Statistician 39 (August): 3.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Special thanks are due to Professor Donald Lehmann for providing numerous suggestions and encouragement at all stages of the study. Thanks are also due to Professors David Schmittlein and Richard Colombo and two anonymous reviewers for helpful comments on an earlier draft of the paper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Narayanan, S. Incorporating heterogeneous adoption rates in new product diffusion: A model and empirical investigations. Marketing Letters 3, 395–406 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00993923

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00993923

Key words

Navigation