Motivation and Emotion

, Volume 5, Issue 2, pp 139–152 | Cite as

Causal attributions of high and low achievement motivation college students for performance on examinations

  • Robert M. Arkin
  • Candace S. Detchon
  • Geoffrey M. Maruyama
Article

Abstract

College students high and low in test anxiety attributed their performance on each of four examinations in a course to ability, test difficulty, preparation, and luck. Individuals high and low in test anxiety typically evidence systematic predispositions to account for their achievement-related behavior in different terms. The present research substantially replicated these earlier (laboratory and Intellectual Achievement Responsibility Scale) findings in an actual achievement setting. In addition, however, the present findings differed from the earlier evidence in some important respects. Specifically, (a) high test-anxiety students' attributions for failure were far less self-deprecating than in the laboratory evidence, and (b) high test-anxiety students' attributions (for both success and failure) became more personally flattering, or comforting, as the semester progressed. Results were discussed in terms of the laboratory — field distinction and of the influence of a temporal, or time of measurement, factor, hitherto ignored in the causal attribution literature.

Keywords

College Student Responsibility Scale Early Evidence Test Anxiety Causal Attribution 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arkin, R. M., Appelman, A. J., & Burger, J. M. Social anxiety, self-presentation, and the self-serving bias in causal attribution.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1980,38 23–35.Google Scholar
  2. Arkin, R. M., & Maruyama, G. M. Attribution, affect, and college exam performance.Journal of Educational Psychology 1979,71 85–93.Google Scholar
  3. Bar-Tal, D. Attributional analysis of achievement-related behavior.Review of Educational Research 1978,48 259–271.Google Scholar
  4. Bar-Tal, D., & Frieze, I. Achievement motivation for males and females as a determinant of attributions for success and failure.Journal of Sex Roles 1977,3 301–313.Google Scholar
  5. Brockner, J. The effects of self-esteem, success-failure, and self-consciousness on task performance.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1979,37 1732–1741.Google Scholar
  6. Crandall, V. C., Katkovsky, W., & Crandall, V. S. Children's beliefs in their own control of reinforcements in intellectual-academic achievement situations.Child Development 1965,36 91–109.Google Scholar
  7. Diener, C. I., & Dweck, C. S. An analysis of learned helplessness: II. The processing of success.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1980,39 940–952.Google Scholar
  8. Dweck, C. S. The role of expectations and attributions in the alleviation of learned helplessness.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1975,31 674–685.Google Scholar
  9. Frieze, I. H., Snyder, H. N., & Fontaine, C. M.Student attributions and the attribution model during an actual examination. Paper presented at the 85th annual meetings of the American Psychological Association, San Francisco, August 1977.Google Scholar
  10. Heider, F.The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley, 1958.Google Scholar
  11. Kukla, A. Attributional determinants of achievement-related behavior.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1972,21 166–174.Google Scholar
  12. Luginbuhl, J. E. R., Crowe, D. H., & Kahan, J. P. Causal attributions for success and failure.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1975,31 86–93.Google Scholar
  13. McMahan, I. D. Relationships between causal attributions and expectancy of success.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1973,28 108–114.Google Scholar
  14. Miller, D. T. Ego involvement and attributions for success and failure.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1976,34 901–906.Google Scholar
  15. Pancer, S. M. Causal attributions and anticipated future performance.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 1978,4 600–603.Google Scholar
  16. Sarason, I. G. Experimental approaches to test-anxiety: Attention and the use of information. In C. D. Spielberger (Ed.),Anxiety: Current trends in theory and research (Vol. 2). New York: Academic Press, 1972.Google Scholar
  17. Weiner, B., Frieze, I., Kukla, A., Reed, C., Rest, S., & Rosenbaum, R. M.Perceiving the causes of success and failure. New York: General Learning Press, 1971.Google Scholar
  18. Weiner, B., & Kukla, A. An attributional analysis of achievement motivation.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1970,15 1–20.Google Scholar
  19. Weiner, B., & Potepan, P. A. Personality correlates and affective reactions toward exams of succeeding and failing college students.Journal of Educational Psychology 1970,61 144–151.Google Scholar
  20. Weiner, B., Russell, D., & Lerman, D., Affective consequences of causal ascriptions. In J. H. Harvey, W. J. Ickes, & R. F. Kidd (Eds.),New directions in attribution research (Vol. 2). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum, 1978.Google Scholar
  21. Weiner, B., & Sierad, S. Misattributions for failure and enhancement of achievement strivings.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1975,31 415–421.Google Scholar
  22. Wine, J. Cognitive-attentional theory of test anxiety. In I. G. Sarason (Ed.),Text anxiety: Theory, research, and application. New York: Erlbaum, 1980.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert M. Arkin
    • 1
  • Candace S. Detchon
    • 1
  • Geoffrey M. Maruyama
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Psychology, McAlester HallUniversity of Missouri-ColumbiaColumbia
  2. 2.University of MinnesotaUSA

Personalised recommendations