Abstract
In spite of the fact that it is required only occasionally for sanitary reasons and not legally mandatory, the practice of embalming is widespread in contemporary American society. This study explores the historical, cultural and psychological factors which gave rise to the practice of embalming and why the practice continues. Two case studies are presented in which delayed grief reactions were present; linkages with embalming are described. It is suggested that the frightening finitude of the self and a fear of death in modern society have led to practices in which the corpse is viewed as looking “natural,” thus denying the reality of death. Embalming is seen as the final assault on the self, which can also carry with it problematic psychological consequences for the survivors.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Kiselman, T. Death in historical perspective.Sociol Forum 1987; 2 (Summer): 2–3.
Ibid.
Van Gennep, A.The Rites of Passage. Vizedon MB, Caffe GL, trans. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1961.
Mathieu, V.Storia della Filosofia. Vol. 1. Brescia, Italy: La Scuola, 1972.
Alighieri, D.La Divina Commedia. Vols. I, II, III. Turin, Italy: Unione Tipografica Torinese, 1963.
Lavine, TZ.From Socrates to Sartre: The Philosophical Quest. New London: Bantam Books, 1984.
Kiselman: 3.
Farrell, J.Inventing the American Way Way of Death. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1980.
Wisconsin Administration Code. Health and Social Services. HSS135.04. Preparation and Funeral. Para. C, 1990.
Statistics from the 73rd Annual Program Meeting of the Cremation Association of North America. Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 1991. Obtained from the National Association of Funeral Directors, Milwaukee, WI, U.S.A.
Feifel H. Psychology and death: meaningful rediscovery.American Psychologist 1990; 45: 537–543.
Marcuse, H.One Dimensional Mean: Studies in the Ideology of Advanced Industrial Society. Boston: Beacon Press, 1966.
22A AmJur 2nd,Dead Bodies, 113.
Right of privacy. 103Harvard Law Review, *1130, *1163, n. 49.
Right of privacy. 39Vanderbilt Law Review, *1199, *1128.
Farrell: 160.
Fulton RL. The clergyman and the funeral director: a study in role and conflict.Social Forces 1961;39:317–323.
Jackson CO. The clergy and the funeral director: complementary or contrasting perspectives? Reported by French HW,Death Studies 1985;9:143–153.
Feifel: 538.
Kübler-Ross E.On Death and Dying. New York: Macmillan, 1969.
Gorer G. The pornography of death. In: Phillips W, Rahu P, eds.Modern Writing. New York: Berkeley, 1956:
Bowlby J.Loss. New York: Basic Books, 1980.
Bowlby J.Separation. New York: Basic Books, 1973.
Widdison HA, Salisbury HG. The delayed stress syndrome: a pathological delayed grief reaction.Omega 1989–90;20:293–306.
Caplan G. Mastery of stress: psychosocial aspects.Am J Psychiatry, 1981;138:413–419.
Lindemann E. The symptomatology and management of acute grief.Amer J Psychiatry 1944;101:141–148.
Rubin SS. The resolution of bereavement: a clinical focus on the relationship to the deceased.Psychotherapy 1985;22:231–235.
Lindemann: 147.
Pincus L. The process of mourning and grief. In: Shneidman ES, ed.Death: Current Perspectives. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield, 1984:
Caplan G. Loss, stress and mental health.Comm Mental Health J. 1990;26:27–48.
Pincus: 172.
Lamm M.The Jewish Way in Death and Mourning. New York: Johnathan David, 1969:26–28.
Feifel: 537.
Gorer: 35.
Fulton R. The sacred and the secular: attitudes of the American public towards death, funerals and funeral directors. In: Fulton R, Geis G, eds.Death and Identity. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1965: 89–105.
Peretz D. Development and loss. In: Schoenberg B, Carr AC, Peretz D, Kutscher AH, eds.Loss and Grief: Psychological Management in Medical Practice. New York: Columbia University Press, 1970: 3–19.
Carter CL. Eros and thanatos: images of life and death in contemporary art. In:Images of Death in Contemporary Art. Milwaukee: Marquette University, 1990: 5–17.
Ibid: 5–6.
Huxley A.Brave New World. New York: Harper's, 1946.
Irion PE.The Funeral: Vestige or Value? Nashville: Abingdon Press, 1966.
Mitford J.The American Way of Death. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1963.
Ibid.
Parkes CM. Bereavement. [Review Article].Brit J Psychiatry 1985;146:11–17.
Farrell: 65.
Pincus: 402–12.
Durkheim E.The Elementary Forms of Religious Life. Swame JW, trans. London: Allen and Union, 1954.
Mandelbaum DC. Social uses of funeral rites. In: Feifel H. ed.The Meaning of Death. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1959: 189–217.
Farrell: 65.
Patrick GTW.The World and its Meaning: An Introduction to Philosophy. Boston, New York: Houghton Mifflin, 1924: 379, 381.
Lavine: 65.
Tolstoy L.The Death of Ivan Ilyich. Solotaroff L, trans. New York: Bantam, 1987.
Ibid: III.
Lamm: 29, 31.
Lindemann: 34.
Feifel: 540–41.
Teilhard de Chardin P.The Phenomenon of Man. New York: Harper and Row, 1955: 259.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Palermo, G.B., Gumz, E.J. The last invasion of human privacy and its psychological consequences on survivors: A critique of the practice of embalming. Theoretical Medicine 15, 397–408 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00993797
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00993797