Abstract
Familial clustering of a disease is defined as the occurrence of the disease within some families in excess of what would be expected from the occurrence in the population. It has been demonstrated for several cancer types, ranging from rare cancers as the adenomatosis-coli-associated colon cancer or the Li-Fraumeni syndrome to more common cancers as breast cancer and colon cancer. Familial clustering, however, is merely an epidemiological pattern, and it does not tell whether genetic or environmental causes or both in combination are responsible for the familial clustering. Familial clustering may be due to genetic predisposition to the disease, but exposure to environmental factors — shared by members of some families, but not by members of other families — may also cause familial clustering and hence mimic genetic inheritance in the study of nuclear families. Based on assumptions regarding the individual steps in the biological process starting with exposure to carcinogens and ending with death from disseminated cancer we suggest that genetic and environmental factors may both be involved in most of these steps. The present paper focuses on research methodologies necessary to discriminate between the effect of genes and family environment in the development of cancer.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Lynch HT, Hirayama T. ed.Genetic Epidemiology of Cancer Boca Raton, Florida: CRP Press Inc., 1989.
Ibid.
Sørensen TIA, Nielsen GG, Andersen PK, Teasdale TW. Genetic and environmental influences on premature death in adult adoptees.N Engl J Med 1988:318;727–732.
Borch-Johnsen K, Sørensen TIA. Genes and environment in the inheritance of morbidity and mortality.Acta Psychiatr Scand 1993; Suppl 370:73–78.
International Agency for Research on Cancer. Overall evaluation of carcinogenecity: an updating of IARC monographs Volumes 1–42. Lyon 1987 (IARC monographs on evaluation of the carcinogenic risk of chemicals to humans, Suppl 7).
Nielsen GG, Gill RD, Andersen PK, Sørensen TIA. A counting process approach to maximum likelihood estimation in frailty models.Scand J Statist 1992;19:25–43.
Ottman R. An epidemiological approach to gene-environment interaction.Gen Epidemiol 1990;7:177–85.
Ottman R, Susser E, Meisner M. Control for environmental risk factors in assessing genetic effectson disease familial aggregation.Am J Epidemiol 1991;134:298–309.
Neale MC, Cardon LR.Methodology for Genetic Studies of Twins and Families. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1992.
Holm NV, Hauge M, Jensen OM. Studies of cancer aetiology in a complete twin population: breast cancer colorectal cancer and leukaemia.Cancer Surv 1982;1:1–32.
Hewitt JK. Of biases and more in the study of twins reared together.Behav Gen 1989;19:605–8.
See note 3.
See note 9.
Barker DJP, ed.Fetal and Infant Origins of Adult Disease. British Medical Journal Plymouth: Latimer Trend and Company Ltd., 1992.
Selles TA, Ooi WL, Elston RC, Chen VW, Bailey-Wilson JE, Rothschild H. Increased familial risk of non-lung cancer among relatives of lung cancer patients.Am J Epidemiol 1987:126:237–246.
Lynch HT, Krush AJ, Lemon HMet al. Tumor variation in families with breast cancer.J Am Med Assoc 1972;222:1631–35.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Borch-Johnsen, K., Olsen, J.H. & Sørensen, T.I.A. Genes and family environment in familial clustering of cancer. Theoretical Medicine 15, 377–386 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00993795
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00993795