Abstract
A formulation for the explanation of behavior is needed to guide the work of the applied psychologist whose first task is to explain behavior. It can also serve as a coordinating framework for the basic research that centers around each of psychology's many constructs. This paper puts forward the notion that the appropriate framework reflects the intersection of numerous person and environment systems; in other words, that it is found in the structure of a situation. Continuity within the science of psychology is promoted if an appropriate structure is found in the classic situations of the experimental laboratory. A prototypical situation that is based on the major paradigms of instrumental learning is described. It has already shown considerable utility in organizing the investigation of behavioral determinants in a real-world setting, and its ability to clarify interrelationships among psychology's constructs also looks promising.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amsel, A., & Roussel, J. Motivational properties of frustration: 1. Effect on a running response of the addition of frustration to the motivational complex.Journal of Experimental Psychology 1952,43 363–368.
Appley, M. H. (Ed.).Adaptation-level theory. New York: Academic Press, 1971.
Argyle, M. Predictive and generative rules: Models of P X S interaction. In D. Magnusson & N. S. Endler (Eds.),Personality at the crossroads: Current issues in interactional psychology Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum, 1977.
Atkinson, J. W. The study of motivation. In J. Kagan, M. H. Haith, & C. Caldwell (Eds.),Psychology: Adapted readings New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1971.
Bolles, R. C.Theory of motivation. New York: Harper & Row, 1967.
Bolles, R. C.Theory of motivation (2nd ed.). New York: Harper & Row, 1975.
Boneau, C. A. Paradigm regained? Cognitive behaviorism restated.American Psychologist 1974,29 297–309.
Brown, J. S.The motivation of behavior. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1961.
Campbell, J. P., & Pritchard, R. D. Motivation theory in industrial and organizational psychology. In M. D. Dunnette (Ed.),Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1976.
Cofer, C. N.Motivation and emotion. Glenview, Illinois: Scott, Foresman, 1972.
Cofer, C. N.Cognitive psychology and the problem of motivation: Implications for I/O psychology. Invited address, presented to the Division of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, Toronto, Canada, August 31, 1978.
Cofer, C. N., & Appley, M. H.Motivation: Theory and research. New York: Wiley, 1964.
Dhalla, N. K., & Mahatoo, W. H. Expanding the scope of segmentation research.Journal of Marketing 1976,40 34–41.
Endler, N. S., Hunt, J. McV., & Rosenstein, A. J. An S-R inventory of anxiousness.Psychological Monographs, 1962,76, (Whole No. 536).
Fennell, G. Motivation research revisited.Journal of Advertising Research 1975,15 23–28. (a)
Fennell, G. What is a situation? A motivational paradigm.Journal of Psychology 1975,91 259–269. (b)
Fennell, G. Consumers' perceptions of the product-use situation.Journal of Marketing 1978,42 38–47.
Fennell, G. Attention engagement. In J. Leigh & C. R. Martin, Jr. (Eds.),Current issues and research in advertising. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, 1979.
Fennell, G. Attitude, motivation, and marketing or, where do the attributes come from? In R. Olshavsky (Ed.),Attitude research enters the eighties. Chicago: American Marketing Association, 1980.
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I.Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, Massuchetts: Addison-Wesley, 1975.
Gibbs, J. C. The meaning of ecologically oriented inquiry in contemporary psychology.American Psychologist 1979,34 127–140.
Golding, S. L. The problem of construal styles in the analysis of person-situation interactions. In D. Magnusson & N. S. Endler (Eds.),Personality at the crossroads: Current issues in interactional psychology. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum, 1977.
Herrnstein, R. J. The evolution of behaviorism.American Psychologist 1977,32 593–603.
Irwin, F. W.Intentional behavior and motivation: A cognitive theory. New York: Lippincott, 1971.
Kassarjian, H. H. Personality and consumer behavior: A review.Journal of Marketing Research 1971,8 409–418.
Katz, D. Consistency for what? The functional approach. In R. P. Abelson, E. Aronson, W. J. McGuire, T. M. Newcomb, M. J. Rosenberg, & P. H. Tannenbaum (Eds.),Theories of cognitive consistency: A sourcebook. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1968.
Keen, E.A primer in phenomenological psychology. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1975.
Klinger, E. Consequences of commitment to and disengagement from incentives.Psychological Review 1975,82 1–25.
Kruglanski, A. W. The endogenous-exogenous partition in attribution theory.Psychological Review 1975,82 387–406.
Lazarus, R. S. Emotions and adaptation: Conceptual and empirical relations. In W. J. Arnold (Ed.),Nebraska symposium on motivation. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1968.
Lewin, K.Principles of topological psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1936.
Lieberman, D. A. A (limited) call for a return to introspection.American Psychologist 1979,34 319–333.
Lunn, T. Segmenting and constructing markets. In R. M. Worcester & J. Downham (Eds.),Consumer market research handbook (2nd ed.). Workingham, England: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1978.
Magnusson, D., & Endler, N. S. (Eds.).Personality at the crossroads: Current issues in interactional psychology. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum, 1977.
Miller, N. E. Experimental studies of conflict. In J. McV. Hunt (Ed.),Personality and the behavior disorders (Vol. 1). New York: Ronald Press, 1944.
Mischel, W.Personality and assessment. New York: Wiley, 1968.
Mowrer, O. H.Learning theory and personality dynamics: Selected papers. New York: Ronald Press, 1950.
Neisser, U.Cognition and reality: Principles and implications of cognitive psychology. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman, 1976.
Peak, H. Attitude and motivation. In M. R. Jones (Ed.),Nebraska symposium on motivation. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1955.
Pernica, J. The second generation of market segmentation studies: An audit of buying motivations. In W. D. Wells (Ed.),Life style and psychographics. Chicago: American Marketing Association, 1974.
Pervin, L. A. The representative design of person-situation research. In D. Magnusson & N. S. Endler (Eds.),Personality at the crossroads: Current issues in interactional psychology. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum, 1977.
Petrinovich, L. Probabilistic functionalism: A conception of research method.American Psychologist 1979,34 373–390.
Powers, W. T.Behavior: The control of perception. Chicago: Aldine, 1973.
Ryan, T. A.Intentional behavior: An approach to human motivation. New York: Ronald Press, 1970.
Schank, R. C., & Abelson, R. P.Scripts, plans, goals and understanding: An inquiry into human knowledge structures. New York: Halsted, 1977.
Skinner, B. F.About behaviorism. New York: Knopf, 1974.
Stern, G. G.B = f(P, E).Journal of Personality Assessment 1964,28 161–168. Reprinted in R. H. Moos & P. M. Insel (Eds.),Issues in social ecology: Human milieus. Palo Alto: National Press Books, 1974.
Weiner, B.Human motivation. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1980.
Wilkie, W. W., & Cohen, J. B.An overview of market segmentation: Behavioral concepts and research approaches. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Marketing Science Institute, 1977.
Wind, Y. Issues and advances in segmentation research.Journal of Marketing Research 1978,15 317–337.
Young, P. T.Motivation and emotion: A survey of the determinants of human and animal activity. New York: Wiley, 1961.
Young, S. Psychographics research and marketing relevancy. In C. W. King & D. J. Tigert (Eds.),Attitude research reaches new heights. Chicago: American Marketing Association, 1971.
Ziff, R. The role of psychographics in the development of advertising strategy. In W. D. Wells (Ed.),Life style and psychographics. Chicago: American Marketing Association, 1974.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Thanks are due to C. Cofer, J. Keenan, E. Mannucci, and M. Nadien for their helpful comments on a draft of this paper.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fennell, G. The situation. Motiv Emot 4, 299–322 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00993582
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00993582