Abstract
As each presidential election passes into the history books, debate renews over the status of the New Deal Party System. This article addresses part of that debate by examining changes in the electorate's assessment of New Deal issues. Despite the vast literature on realignment, there have been few efforts to see whether issues associated with the New Deal still shape the political attitudes of the American electorate. Using the NES's openended like/dislike questions on parties and candidates from 1952 to 1988, I show that New Deal issues remain central to the partisan attitudes of the public. These findings show that the agenda of the New Deal remains an integral part of how the American public thinks about their candidates and parties. There, of course, has been much change over the last four decades, but these results suggest, in general, that at least parts of the New Deal Party System remain intact.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Axelrod, Robert (1986). Presidential election coalitions in 1984.American Political Science Review 80:281–284.
Beck, Paul Allen (1979). The electoral cycle and patterns of American politics.British Journal of Political Science 9:129–156.
Beck, Paul Allen (1982). Realignment begins?American Politics Quarterly 10:421–438.
Beck, Paul Allen (1984). The dealignment era in America. In Russell J. Dalton, Scott C. Flanigan, and Paul Allen Beck (eds.),Electoral Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Black, Earl, and Merle Black (1987).Politics and Society in the South. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Burnham, Walter Dean (1970).Critical Elections and the Mainsprings of American Politics. New York, NY: Norton.
Carmines, Edward G., and James A. Stimson (1981). Issue evolution, population replacement and normal partisan change.American Political Science Review 75:107–118.
Carmines, Edward G., and James A. Stimson (1984). The dynamics of issue evolution: The United States. In Russell J. Dalton, Scott C. Flanigan, and Paul Allen Beck (eds.),Electoral Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Carmines, Edward G., and James A. Stimson (1989).Issue Evolution. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Cavanagh, Thomas, and James Sundquist (1985). The new two-party system. In John E. Chubb and Paul E. Peterson (eds.),The New Direction of American Politics. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
Clubb, Jerome M., William H. Flanigan, and Nancy H. Zingale (1980).Partisan Realignment. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
Drew, Elizabeth (1981).Portrait of an Election. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Geer, John G. (1991). Do open-ended questions measure “salient” issues?Public Opinion Quarterly 55:360–370.
Johnson, Donald Bruce, and Kirk Porter (1973).National Party Platforms, 1840–1972. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
Kagay, Michael (1980). On two models of voter decision making: Stokes' six components and the Kelley-Mirer rule. Photocopy, Princeton University.
Kelley, Stanley, Jr. (1983).Interpreting Elections. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Kelley, Stanley, Jr. (1988). Democracy and the New Deal Party System. In Amy Guttman (ed.),Democracy and the Welfare State. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Key, V. O. (1955). A theory of critical elections.Journal of Politics 17:3–18.
Ladd, Everett Carll, and Charles D. Hadley (1978).Transformations of the Party System, 2nd ed. New York: Norton.
Miller, Warren E. (1987). Party identification re-examined: The Reagan era. InWhere's the Party? Washington, DC: Center for National Policy.
Norpoth, Helmut (1987). Under way and here to stay: Party realignment in the 1980s?Public Opinion Quarterly 51:376–391.
Norpoth, Helmut, and Michael Kagay (1989). Another eight years of Republican rule and still no partisan realignment? Paper presented at the APSA conference in Atlanta.
Norpoth, Helmut, and Jerrold Rusk (1982). Partisan dealignment in the American electorate: Itemizing the deductions since 1964.American Political Science Review 76:522–537.
Petrocik, John R. (1981).Party Coalitions. Chicago: IL: University of Chicago Press.
Petrocik, John R. (1987). Realignment: The South, New Party coalitions and the elections of 1984 and 1986. InWhere's the Party? Washington, DC: Center for National Policy.
Petrocik, John R. (1989). Issues and agendas: Electoral coalitions in the 1988 election. Paper presented at the APSA conference in Atlanta.
RePass, David E. (1971). Issue salience and party choice.American Political Science Review 65:389–400.
Shanks, Merrill J., and Warren E. Miller (1991). Partisanship, policy and performance: The Reagan legacy in the 1988 election.British Journal of Political Science 21:129–197.
Smith, Eric, R. A. N. (1989).The UnChanging American Voter. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Sniderman, Paul M., Richard A. Brody, Jonathan W. Siegel, and Percy H. Tannenbaum (1982). Evaluative bias and issue proximity.Political Behavior 4:115–131.
Stanley, Harold W. (1987). Southern partisan changes: Dealignment, realignment, or both?Journal of Politics 50:64–88.
Stanley, Harold W., and William Bianco, and Richard G. Niemi (1986). Partisanship and group support over time: A multivariate analysis.American Political Science Review 80:969–976.
Sundquist, James L. (1983).Dynamics of the Party System. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
Wattenberg, Martin P. (1990).The Decline of American Political Parties, 3rd ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Geer, J.G. New deal issues and the American electorate, 1952–1988. Polit Behav 14, 45–65 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00993508
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00993508