Skip to main content
Log in

The puzzle transformed: Explaining declining turnout

  • Published:
Political Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This analysis of the decline in aggregate voting turnout in the United States between the 1950s and the 1980s attributes the decline to changes in the generational composition of the electorate. In particular, the post-New Deal generation (first presidential vote in 1968 or later), which continues to grow in size, votes at a rate well below that of older generations. A minor part of the generational differences in turnout can be attributed to generational differences in party identification and social connectedness (as measured by such indicators as home ownership and church attendance). The larger portion of generational turnout differences cannot be directly explained with variables contained in the National Election Studies. The generational differences in turnout arenot reflected in preelection participation (informal campaigning, doing party work, etc.) and they cannot be accounted for by a declining sense of political efficacy or citizen duty or by lessened interest in campaigns and election outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abramson, Paul R. (1989). Generations and political change in the United States.Research in Political Sociology 4:235–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abramson, Paul R., and John H. Aldrich (1982). The decline of electoral participation in America.American Political Science Review 76:502–521.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abramson, Paul R., John H. Aldrich, and David W. Rhode (1982).Change and Continuity in the 1980 Election. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, Samuel H., and Max Kaase (1979).Political Action. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, Earle and Merle Black (1987).Politics and Society in the South. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brody, Richard A. (1978). The puzzle of political participation in America. In Anthony King (ed.),The New American Political System. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute, p. 290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, David, and Donald Stokes (1969).Political Change in Britain. London: Macmillan, p. 59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlsson, Gosta, and Katarina Karlsson (1970). Age, cohorts and the generation of generations.American Sociological Review 35:710–718.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassell, Carol A. (1987). The origins of Democratic citizen attitudes. Presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago.

  • Cassell, Carol A., and Robert C. Luskin (1988). Simple explanations of turnout decline.American Political Science Review 82:1321–1330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Converse, Philip E. (1976).The Dynamics of Party Support. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferejohn, John A., and James H. Kuklinski (1990).Information and Democratic Processes. Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, Ronald (1977)The Silent Revolution. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, Ronald (1990).Culture Shift in Advanced Industrial Society. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jennings, M. Kent, and Gregory B. Markus (1984). Partisan orientations over the long haul: Results from the three-wave political socialization panel study.American Political Science Review 78:1000–1018.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jennings, M. Kent, and Richard G. Niemi (1980).Generations and Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jennings, M. Kent, and Jan W. van Deth, et al. (1990).Continuities in Political Action. Berlin and New York: De Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenney, Patrick J. (1991). A dynamic simultaneous equation model of turnout, forthcoming.

  • Knack, Stephen (1991) Taking the politics out of voting: Electoral participation as social cooperation. Presented at the annual meeting of the Southwestern Political Science Association, San Antonio.

  • Kleppner, Paul R. (1982).Who Voted? The Dynamics of Electoral Turnout, 1870–1980. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leighley, Jan (1991). Participation as a stimulus of political conceptualization.Journal of Politics 53:198–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luskin, Robert C. (1987). Explaining political sophistication. Presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.

  • Mannheim, Karl (1952). The problem of generations. In Paul Kesckemeti (ed.),Essays on the Sociology of Knowledge. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Warren E. (1980). Disinterest, disaffection, and participation in presidential politics.Political Behavior 2:7–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Warren E. (1990). The electorate's view of the parties. In L. Sandy Maisel (ed.),The Parties Respond. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Warren E. (1991). The stability of party identification, realignment and party voting: Back to the basics.American Political Science Review 85:557–568.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Warren E., and Teresa Levitin (1976).Leadership and Change: Presidential Elections from 1952–1976. Cambridge, MA: Winthrop Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Warren E., and J. Merrill Shanks (1982). Policy directions and presidential leadership: Alternative interpretations of the 1980 presidential election.British Journal of Political Science 12:308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pomper, Gerald M., and Loretta Sernekos (1989). The “bake sale” theory of voting participation. Prepared for the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Atlanta.

  • Shaffer, Stephen D. (1981). A multi-variate explanation of decreasing turnout in presidential elections, 1960–1976.American Journal of Political Science 25:68–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, Walter, and Ronald Rapoport (1992) Disaggregating political change: The case of the Iowa caucuses, 1984–1988. forthcoming.

  • Teixeira, Ruy A (1987).Why Americans Don't Vote: Turnout Decline in the United States, 1960–1984. New York: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfinger, Raymond E., and Stephen J. Rosenstone (1980).Who Votes? New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Miller, W.E. The puzzle transformed: Explaining declining turnout. Polit Behav 14, 1–43 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00993507

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00993507

Keywords

Navigation