Machine Learning

, Volume 10, Issue 2, pp 185–190 | Cite as

A reply to Cohen's book review of Creating a Memory of Causal Relationships

  • Michael Pazzani
Article
  • 166 Downloads

Conclusions

Progress in machine learning must consist of periods of exploration followed by periods of more thorough careful investigation of issues raised during exploration. The research reported inCreating a Memory of Causal Relationships is exploratory in that it addresses a problem that was not previously investigated in the mainstream of machine learning research. However, I feel that the problem studied was worthy of investigation and is worthy of continued investigation since it corresponds to an important part of the human learning process.

Keywords

Artificial Intelligence Machine Learning Learning Process Causal Relationship Book Review 

References

  1. Cain, T., Pazzani, M., & Silverstein, G. (1991). Using domain knowledge to influence similarity judgments.Proceedings of the Case-Based Reasoning Workshop (pp. 191–199). Washington, DC: Morgan Kaufrmann.Google Scholar
  2. Cohen, W. (1992). Abductive explanation-based learning: A solution to the multiple inconsistent explanation problem.Machine Learning.Google Scholar
  3. Cohen, W. (this issue). Book review:Creating a Memory of Causal Relationships. Machine Learning.Google Scholar
  4. Dietterich, T. (1990). Editorial: Exploratory research in machine learning.Machine Learning, 5, 5–9.Google Scholar
  5. Hufbauer, G.C., & Schott, J.J. (1985).Economic sanctions reconsidered: History and current policy. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
  6. Meehan, J. (1981). Talespin. In R. Schank & C. Riesbeck (Eds.),Inside computer understanding: Five programs plus miniatures. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  7. Minton, S. (1988).Learning effective search control knowledge: An explanation-based effect. Doctoral dissertation, Computer Science Department, Carnegie Mellon University.Google Scholar
  8. Moorehead, C. (1980).Hostages for fortune: A study of kidnapping in the world today. New York: Atheneum.Google Scholar
  9. Pazzani, M.J. (1990).Creating a memory of causal relationships: An integration of empirical and explanation-based learning methods. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  10. Pazzani, M. (1991a). The influence of prior knowledge on concept acquisition: Experimental and computational results.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 17(3, 416–432.Google Scholar
  11. Pazzani, M.J. (1991b). Learning causal patterns: Deliberately overgeneralizing to facilitate transfer.Proceedings of the Workshop on Multi-Strategy Learning (pp. 19–33). Harper Ferry, WV.Google Scholar
  12. Pazzani, M., & Kibler, D. (1992). The role of prior knowledge in inductive learning.Machine Learning, 9, 57–94.Google Scholar
  13. Pazzani, M., & Sarett, W. (1992). A framework for average case analysis of conjunctive learning algorithms.Machine Learning, 9, 349–372.Google Scholar
  14. Schank, R. (1982).Dynamic memory: A theory of reminding and learning in computers and people. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Tambe, M., & Rosenbloom, P. (1989). Eliminating expensive chunks by restricting expressiveness.Proceedings of the Eleventh International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 731–737). Detroit, MI: Morgan Kaufmann.Google Scholar
  16. Wisniewski, E., & Medin, D. (1991). Harpoons and long sticks: The interaction of theory and similarity in rule induction. In D. Fisher, M. Pazzani, & P. Langley (Eds.),Concept formation: Knowledge and experience in unsupervised learning. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael Pazzani
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Information and Computer ScienceUniversity of CaliforniaIrvine

Personalised recommendations