Skip to main content
Log in

Anticandidate voting in the 1984 presidential election

  • Published:
Political Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Data from a national survey conducted in 1984 form the basis for a new analysis of anticandidate voting in presidential elections, i.e., voting focused more on a candidate one opposes than on a candidate one prefers. Anticandidate voting is viewed as the end product of a process whereby voters attempt to reduce discomfort that cross-pressures generate within their decision frameworks. In 1984, nearly a third of all likely voters said they were primarily motivated by a desire to voteagainst one of the two presidential candidates, a rate of anticandidate voting similar to that observed in the Johnson-Goldwater election of 1964 but well below that of the 1980 Reagan-Carter election. However, factors related to anticandidate voting in the past were not consistently linked to anticandidate voting in 1984. We conclude that the presence of Ronald Reagan exerted such a strong influence on the 1984 campaign that processes that would normally be observable, such as anticandidate voting, were overridden.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Gant, Michael M., and Davis, Dwight F. (1984). Negative voting in presidential elections.Western Political Quarterly 37: 272–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gant, Michael M., and Sigelman, Lee (1985). Anti-candidate voting in presidential elections.Polity 18: 329–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeter, Scott (1985). Public opinion in 1984. In Marlene M. Pomper (ed.),The Election of 1984: Reports and Interpretations. Chatham, N.J.: Chatham House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kernell, Samuel (1977). Presidential popularity and negative voting: An alternative explanation of the midterm congressional decline of the president's party.American Political Science Review 71: 44–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lau, Richard R. (1982). Negativity in political perception.Political Behavior 4: 353–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Light, Paul C., and Lake, Celinda (1985). The election: Candidates, strategies, and decisions. In Michael Nelson (ed.),The Elections of 1984. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pomper, Gerald M. (1985). The presidential election. In Marlene M. Pomper (ed.),The Election of 1984: Reports and Interpretations. Chatham, N.J.: Chatham House.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sigelman, L., Gant, M.M. Anticandidate voting in the 1984 presidential election. Polit Behav 11, 81–92 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00993368

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00993368

Keywords

Navigation