Motivation and Emotion

, Volume 12, Issue 3, pp 271–302 | Cite as

From appraisal to emotion: Differences among unpleasant feelings

  • Phoebe C. Ellsworth
  • Craig A. Smith

Abstract

Recent research has indicated strong relations between people's appraisals of their circumstances and their emotional states. The present study examined these relations across a range of unpleasant situations in which subjects experienced complex emotional blends. Subjects recalled unpleasant experiences from their pasts that were associated with particular appraisals and described their appraisals and emotions during these experiences. Situations defined by particular appraisals along the human agency or situational control dimensions were reliably associated with different levels of anger, sadness, and guilt, as predicted. However, predicted differences in emotion were not observed for situations selected for appraisals along the certainty or attention dimensions. Most subjects reported experiencing blends of two or more emotions, and correlation/regression analyses indicated that even in the context of these blends, patterns of appraisal similar to those observed previously (Smith & Ellsworth, 1985, 1987) characterized the experience of the individual emotions. The regressions further indicated that appraisals along some dimensions were more important to the experience of particular emotions than were appraisals along other dimensions. Thesecentral appraisals are compared with the adaptive functions their associated emotions are believed to serve, and the implications of these findings are discussed.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abelson, R. P. (1983). Whatever became of consistency theory?Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 9 37–54.Google Scholar
  2. Arnold, M. B. (1960).Emotion and personality (2 vols.). New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Cannon, W. B. (1927). The James-Lange theory of emotion: A critical examination and an alternative theory.American Journal of Psychology, 39 106–124.Google Scholar
  4. Cannon, W. B. (1929).Bodily changes in pain, hunger, fear, and rage (2nd ed.). New York: Appleton-Century.Google Scholar
  5. Carlsmith, J. M., & Gross, A. E. (1969). Some effects of guilt on compliance.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 11 232–239.Google Scholar
  6. Cohen, S., Sherrod, D. R., & Clark, M. S. (1986). Social skills and the stress protective role of social support.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50 963–973.Google Scholar
  7. Coyne, J. (1976). Toward an interactional description of depression.Psychiatry, 39 28–40.Google Scholar
  8. D'Andrade, R. G. (1981). The cultural part of cognition.Cognitive Science, 5 179–195.Google Scholar
  9. Darwin, C. (1965).The expression of the emotions in man and animals. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1872)Google Scholar
  10. Ellsworth, P. C., & Smith, C. A. (1987).Models and memories of emotion: A comparison of their associated appraisals and facial expressions. Unpublished manuscript, Stanford University.Google Scholar
  11. Folkman, S., & Lazarus, R. S. (1980). An analysis of coping in a middle-aged community sample.Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 21 219–239.Google Scholar
  12. Folkman, S., & Lazarus, R. S. (1985). If it changes it must be a process: Study of emotion and coping during three stages of a college examination.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48 150–170.Google Scholar
  13. Folkman, S., Lazarus, R. S., Dunkel-Schetter, C., DeLongis, A., & Gruen, R. J. (1986). The dynamics of a stressful encounter: Cognitive appraisal, coping, and encounter outcomes.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50 992–1003.Google Scholar
  14. Freedman, J. L., Wallington, S. A., & Bless, E. (1967). Compliance without pressure: The effect of guilt.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 7 117–124.Google Scholar
  15. Frijda, N. H., (1986).The emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Frijda, N. H. (1987). Emotion, cognitive structure, and action tendency.Cognition and Emotion, 1 115–143.Google Scholar
  17. Izard, C. E. (1972).Patterns of emotions. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  18. Izard, C. E. (1977).Human emotions. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  19. James, W. (1950).The principles of psychology (Vol. 2). New York: Dover. (Original work published 1890)Google Scholar
  20. Konečni, V. J. (1972). Some effects of guilt on compliance: A field replication.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 23 30–32.Google Scholar
  21. Lazarus, R. S. (1968). Emotions and adaptation: Conceptual and empirical relations. In W. J. Arnold (Ed.),Nebraska symposium on motivation, 1968 (pp. 175–266). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  22. Lazarus, R. S. (1982). Thoughts on the relations between emotion and cognition.American Psychologist, 37 1019–1024.Google Scholar
  23. Lazarus, R. S., Kanner, A. D., & Folkman, S. (1980). Emotions: A cognitive-phenomenological analysis. In R. Plutchik & H. Kellerman (Eds.),Emotion: Theory, research, and experience: Vol. 1. Theories of emotion (pp. 189–217). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  24. Leeper, R. W. (1948). A motivational theory of emotion to replace “emotion as disorganized response.”Psychological Review, 55 5–21.Google Scholar
  25. McGraw, K. M. (1987). Guilt following transgression: An attribution of responsibility approach.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53 247–256.Google Scholar
  26. Milgram, S. (1974).Obedience to authority. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  27. Plutchik, R. (1980).Emotion: A psychoevolutionary synthesis. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  28. Regan, D. T., Williams, M., & Sparling, S. (1972). Voluntary expiation of guilt: A field experiment.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24 42–45.Google Scholar
  29. Roseman, I. J. (1984). Cognitive determinants of emotions: A structural theory, in P. Shaver (Ed.),Review of personality and social psychology: Vol. 5, Emotions, relationships, and health (pp. 11–36). Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
  30. Rosenthal, R., & Rosnow, R. L. (1985).Contrast analysis: Focused comparisons in the analysis of variance. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Russell, D. (1982). The Causal Dimension Scale: A measure of how individuals perceive causes.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42 1137–1145.Google Scholar
  32. Russell, D., & McAuley, E. (1986). Causal attributions, causal dimensions, and affective reactions to success and failure.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50 1174–1185.Google Scholar
  33. Scherer, K. R. (1984). On the nature and function of emotion: A component process approach. In K. R. Scherer & P. Ekman (Eds.),Approaches to emotion (pp. 293–317). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  34. Schwartz, G. E., & Weinberger, D. A. (1980). Patterns of emotional responses to affective situations: Relations among happiness, sadness, anger, fear, depression, and anxiety.Motivation and Emotion, 4 175–191.Google Scholar
  35. Smith, C. A. (1987). The informational structure of the facial expression of emotion.Dissertation Abstracts International, 47, 4002B. (University Microfilms No. 87-00,820)Google Scholar
  36. Smith, C. A., & Ellsworth, P. C. (1985). Patterns of cognitive appraisal in emotion.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48 813–838.Google Scholar
  37. Smith, C. A., & Ellsworth, P. C. (1987). Patterns of appraisal and emotion related to taking an exam.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52 475–488.Google Scholar
  38. Tomkins, S. S. (1963).Affect, imagery, consciousness: Vol. 2. The negative affects. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  39. Wallington, S. A. (1973). Consequences of transgression: Self-punishment and depression.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28 1–7.Google Scholar
  40. Weiner, B. (1985). An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion.Psychological Review, 92 548–573.Google Scholar
  41. Weiner, B., Graham, S., & Chandler, C. (1982). Pity, anger, and guilt,Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 8 226–232.Google Scholar
  42. Zimbardo, P. G. (1970). The human choice: Individuation, reason and order versus deindividuation, impulse and chaos. In N. J. Arnold & D. Levine (Eds.),Nebraska symposium on motivation (pp. 237–307). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Phoebe C. Ellsworth
    • 1
  • Craig A. Smith
    • 1
  1. 1.Stanford UniversityUSA
  2. 2.Research Center for Group Dynamics, ISRUniversity of MichiganAnn Arbor
  3. 3.Peabody CollegeVanderbilt UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations