Advertisement

Motivation and Emotion

, Volume 7, Issue 1, pp 41–60 | Cite as

Active search, mediation, and the manipulation of cue dimensions: Emotion attribution in the false feedback paradigm

  • Steven R. Traux
Article

Abstract

The present experiments investigated the mechanism(s) that produce the false feedback effect. Although the present studies replicated the basic phenomenon, previously proposed mediators of attention and arousal did not appear related to the effects obtained. In Experiment 1, change feedback slides were rated significantly higher than no-change feedback slides (F(1, 39)=11.88,p<.01). Correlations showed that both arousal and nonarousal feedback cues produced active search and influenced stimulus ratings. Attention or arousal differences between change and no-change feedback should not result in equal cue effects. In Experiment 2, feedback rating differences were eliminated by presenting less differentially ambiguous situational stimuli. These findings suggested that important factors in the emotion attribution process may be the relative ambiguity and subjective salience of both situational and physiological cues.

Keywords

Rating Difference Feedback Effect Active Search Feedback Rating Stimulus Rating 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barefoot, J. C., & Straub, R. B. Opportunity for information search and the effect of false heart-rate feedback.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1971, 17, 154–157.Google Scholar
  2. Carver, C. S., & Blaney, P. H. Avoidance behavior and perceived arousal.Motivation and Emotion 1977,1 61–73.Google Scholar
  3. Detweiler, R. A., & Zanna, M. P. Physiological mediation of attitudinal responses.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1976,33 107–116.Google Scholar
  4. Dienstbier, R. A. The role of anxiety and arousal attribution in cheating.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1972,1 61–72.Google Scholar
  5. Fenigstein, A., & Carver, C. S. Self-focusing effects of heartbeat feedback.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1978,8 168–179.Google Scholar
  6. Goldstein, D., Fink, D., & Mettee, D. R. Cognition of arousal and actual arousal as determinants of emotion.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1972,21 41–51.Google Scholar
  7. Hirschman, R. Cross-modal effects of anticipatory bogus heart rate feedback in a negative emotional context.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1975,31 13–19.Google Scholar
  8. Hirschman, R., Clark, M., & Hawk, G. Relative effects of bogus physiological feedback and control stimuli on autonomic and self report indicants of emotional attribution.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 1977,3 270–275.Google Scholar
  9. Kerber, K. W., & Coles, M. G. H. The role of perceived physiological activity in affective judgments.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 1978,14 419–433.Google Scholar
  10. Maslach, C. Negative emotional biasing of unexplained arousal.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1979,37 953–969.Google Scholar
  11. Misovich, S., & Charis, P. C. Information need, affect, and cognition of autonomic activity.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 1974,10 274–283.Google Scholar
  12. Nisbett, R. E., & Valins, S. Perceiving the causes of one's own behavior. In E. E. Jones et al.,Attribution: Perceiving the causes of behavior. New Jersey: General Learning Press, 1972.Google Scholar
  13. Porges, S. W., Ackles, P. K., & Truax, S. R. Psychophysiological measurement: Methodological constraints. In A. Gale & J. Edwards (Eds.),Physiological correlates of human behavior. London: Academic Press, 1982.Google Scholar
  14. Schachter, S., & Singer, J. E. Cognitive, social, and physiological determinants of emotional state.Psychological Review 1962,69 379–399.Google Scholar
  15. Stern, R. M., Botto, R. W., & Herrick, C. D. Behavioral and physiological effects of false heart rate feedback: A replication and extension.Psychophysiology 1972,9 21–29.Google Scholar
  16. Thornton, E. W., & Hagan, P. J. A failure to explain the effects of false feedback on affect by induced changes in physiological response.British Journal of Psychology 1976,67 359–365.Google Scholar
  17. Valins, S. Cognitive effects of false heart-rate feedback.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1966,4 400–408.Google Scholar
  18. Valins, S. Emotionality and information concerning internal reactions.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1967,6 458–463.Google Scholar
  19. Valins, S. Persistent effects of information about internal reactions. Ineffectiveness of debriefing. In H. London & R. E. Nisbett (Eds.),Thought and feeling: Cognitive alteration of feeling states. Chicago: Aldine Press, 1974.Google Scholar
  20. White, M. D., & Wilkins, W. Bogus physiological feedback and response thresholds of repressors and sensitizers.Journal of Research in Personality 1973,7 78–87.Google Scholar
  21. Wilkins, W. Perceptual distortion to account for arousal.Journal of Abnormal Psychology 1971,78 252–257.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • Steven R. Traux
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Nebraska-LincolnUSA

Personalised recommendations