Skip to main content
Log in

Stem modification and cluster transfer in Modern Hebrew

  • Published:
Natural Language & Linguistic Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the formation of Modern Hebrew denominative verbs, two structural properties are transferred from the base to the derived form: the consonantal root and the consonant cluster. While the model of Root-to-Template Association (McCarthy 1981) is largely based on root transfer, it fails to account for cluster transfer. In this paper I argue that the model which can actually account for cluster transfer as well as root transfer is what I will term here Stem Modification (Steriade 1988). Within this model, segmental and prosodic adjustments are made on the base itself and not on some designated material extracted from the base. This approach to stem formation also eliminates the notion of the consonantal root from the grammar of Modern Hebrew.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, Stephen R.: 1992,A-Morphous Morphology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archangeli, Diana: 1991, ‘Syllabification and Prosodic Templates in Yawelmani’,NLLT 9, 231–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aronoff, Mark: 1976,Word Formation in Generative Grammar, MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bat-El, Outi: 1984, ‘Reduplication in Modern Hebrew’, paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, Baltimore.

  • Bat-El, Outi: 1986, ‘Extraction in Modern Hebrew Morphology’, unpublished M.A. thesis, UCLA.

  • Bat-El, Outi: 1989, ‘Phonology and Word Structure in Modern Hebrew’, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, UCLA.

  • Bat-El, Outi: 1994, ‘Resolving Prosodic Mismatch in Modern Hebrew’, to appear in the Proceedings of the 1st HIL Phonology Conference.

  • Berman, Ruth A.: 1985, ‘The Acquisition of Hebrew’, in D. I. Slobin (ed.),The Crosslinguistic Study of Language Acquisition, v.1, Lawrence Erlbaum Association, New Jersey, pp. 25–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berman, Ruth A.: 1990, ‘How a New Root is Formed? Denominative Verbs in Modern Hebrew’, paper presented at the 4th annual workshop of the Israel Association for Theoretical Linguistics, Jerusalem.

  • Blau, Yehoshua: 1972,torat hahége vehacurot, Hakibbutz Hameuchad Publishing, Tel Aviv.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolozky, Shmuel: 1978, ‘Word Formation Strategies in the Hebrew Verb System: Denominative Verbs’,Afroasiatic Linguistics 5, 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clements, George N.: 1985a, ‘The Geometry of Phonological Features’, in C. J. Ewen and J. M. Anderson (eds.),Phonology Yearbook 2, 225–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clements, George N.: 1985b, ‘The Problem of Transfer in Nonlinear Phonology’,Cornell Working Papers in Linguistics 5, 38–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gesenius: 1910,Gesenius' Hebrew Grammar, E. Kautzsch (ed.), A. E. Cowley (revised), Clarendon Press, Oxford, 2nd English ed. (orig. Halle, 1813).

    Google Scholar 

  • Guerssel, Mohamed and Jean Lowenstamm: 1994, ‘On Apophony’, to appear in the Proceedings of the 1st HIL Phonology Conference.

  • Hammond, Michael: 1988, ‘Templatic Transfer in Arabic Broken Plurals’,NLLT 6, 247–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath, Jeffrey: 1987,Ablaut and Ambiguity: Phonology of a Moroccan Arabic Dialect, State University of New York Press, Albany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horvath, Julia: 1981, ‘On the Status of Vowel Patterns in Modern Hebrew: Morphological Rules and Lexical Representation’, in T. Thomas-Finders (ed.),Extended Word-and-Paradigm Theory, Occasional Papers in Linguistics 4, UCLA, pp. 228–261.

  • Inkelas, Sharon: 1990, ‘Prosodic Replacement in Modern Hebrew’, in K. Deaton et al. (eds.),Papers from the 26th Annual Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, Part 2: Parassession on the Syllable in Phonetics and Phonology, Chicago Linguistic Society, Chicago, pp. 197–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Itô, Junko: 1986,Syllable Theory in Prosodic Phonology, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.

  • Itô, Junko: 1989, ‘A Prosodic Theory of Epenthesis’,NLLT 7, 217–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, John J.: 1979, ‘Formal Problems in Semitic Phonology and Morphology’, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, MIT, distributed by Indiana University Linguistic Club, Bloomington.

  • McCarthy, John J.: 1981, ‘A Prosodic Theory of Nonconcatenative Morphology’,Linguistic Inquiry 12, 373–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, John J.: 1984, ‘Prosodic Organization in Morphology’, in M. Aronoff and R. T. Oehrle (eds.),Language Sound Structure, MIT Press, Cambridge Massachusetts, pp. 299–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, John J.: 1986, ‘OCP Effect Gemination and Antigemination’,Linguistic Inquiry 17, 207–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, John J.: 1989, ‘Linear Order in Phonological Representations’,Linguistic Inquiry 20, 71–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, John J.: 1993, ‘Template Form in Prosodic Morphology’, in L. S. Stran (ed.), Papers from the 3rd annual meeting of the Formal Linguistics Society of Mid-America, pp. 187–218.

  • McCarthy, John J. and Alan Prince: 1986, ‘Prosodic Morphology’, unpublished manuscript, University of Massachusetts at Amherst and Brandeis University.

  • McCarthy, John J. and Alan Prince: 1990, ‘Foot and Word in Prosodic Morphology: The Arabic Broken Plural’,NLLT 8, 209–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mester, Armin R.: 1988,Studies in Tier Structure, Garland, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mutaka, Ngessimo and Larry M. Hyman: 1990, ‘Syllable and Morpheme Integrity in Kinande Reduplication’,Phonology 7, v.1, 73–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ornan, Uzi: 1971, ‘binyanim ubsisim, netiyot ugzirot’, HaHa ? universita 16, 15–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarzwald, Ora: 1973–74, ‘šorašim, bsisim umivne hamorfémot’,Lešonenu 38, 131–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selkirk, Elisabeth: 1984, ‘On the Major Class Features and the Syllable Theory’, in M. Aronoff and R. T. Oehrle (eds.),Language Sound Structure, MIT Press, Cambridge, pp. 107–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steriade, Donca: 1988, ‘Reduplication and Syllable Transfer in Sanskrit and Elsewhere’,Phonology 5, v.1 73–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wexler, Paul: 1990,The Schizoid Nature of Modern Hebrew: A Slavic Language in Search of a Semitic Past, Otto Harrassowitz, Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yannai, Yigal: 1973–74, ‘pe?alim merubei?icurim balašon ha?ivrit’, LeLešonenu 38, 118–130, 183–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yip, Moira: 1988, ‘Template Morphology and the Direction of Association’,NLLT 6, 551–577.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

I am grateful to Sharon Inkelas, Wendy Sandler, Donca Steriade, and two anonymous NLLT readers for their valuable comments on earlier drafts of this paper, and to Michele Segal for her editorial work. I alone am responsible for any errors found herein.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bat-El, O. Stem modification and cluster transfer in Modern Hebrew. Nat Lang Linguist Theory 12, 571–596 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992928

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992928

Keywords

Navigation