Skip to main content
Log in

The influence of levels of information on the use of prospective evaluations

  • Published:
Political Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recent work on voting behavior suggests that both retrospective and prospective evaluations are important components of vote choice. To test the generalizability of the prospective model, (1) the same model of voting behavior is applied to groups of differing cognitive abilities, (2) a comparison of the extent to which each group extrapolates from the past to the future is made, and (3) the frequency with which people of each group respond “don't know” is examined. The evidence presented supports the hypothesis that the prospective model is generalizable across segments of the population. Alternatively, since there are relatively few differences across categories, one might view this paper as a collection of negative findings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Achen, Christopher H. (1989). Prospective Voting and the Theory of Party Identification. Paper presented at the 1989 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association.

  • American National Election Study of 1984.

  • Bennett, Stephen Earl (1988). Know-nothings revisited: The meaning of political ignorance today.Social Science Quarterly 69: 476–490.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brody, Richard A. (1986). Candidate evaluations and the vote: Some considerations affecting the application of cognitive psychology to voting behavior. In Richard R. Lau and David O. Sears (eds.),Political Cognition, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chappell, Henry W., Jr., and William R. Keech (1985). A new view of political accountability for economic performance.American Political Science Review 79: 10–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrar, Donald E., and Robert R. Clauber (1967). Multicollinearity in regression analysis: The problem revisited.Review of Economics and Statistics 49: 92–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiorina, Morris P. (1981).Retrospective Voting in American National Elections. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamill, Ruth, and Milton Lodge. (1986). Cognitive consequences of political sophistication. In Richard R. Lau and David O. Sears (eds.),Political Cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Key, V. O. (1966).The Responsible Electorate. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuklinski, James H., and Darrell M. West (1981). Economic expectations and voting behavior in United States Senate and House elections.American Political Science Review 75: 436–447.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis-Beck, Michael S. (1988a). Economics and the American voter: Past, present, future.Political Behavior 10: 5–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis-Beck, Michael S. (1988b).Economics and Elections. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lockerbie, Brad (1989). Change in party identification: The role of prospective economic evaluations.American Politics Quarterly 17: 291–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Arthur H., and Martin P. Wattenberg (1985). Throwing the rascals out: Policy and performance evaluations of presidential candidates, 1952–1980.American Political Science Review 79: 359–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, G. K. (1984).Rational Expectations: An Elementary Exposition. New York: St. Martin's Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sniderman, Paul M., and Richard A. Brody (1977). Coping: The ethic of self-reliance.American Journal of Political Science 21: 501–521.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfinger, Raymond E., and Steven J. Rosenstone (1980).Who Votes? New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lockerbie, B. The influence of levels of information on the use of prospective evaluations. Polit Behav 13, 223–235 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992920

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992920

Keywords

Navigation