Abstract
This paper addresses the problem of democratic elitism within the context of Western European politics. An entrenched assertion of the so-calledelitist theory of democracy is that elites are more strongly committed to democratic values such as political tolerance than are ordinary citizens. The processes through which elites become more tolerant include political socialization, resocialization, political practice, and experience. Some have even argued that elites are the primary carriers of thedemocratic creed. Our purpose here is to test several hypothese drawn from elitist theory. Relying on opinion surveys conducted in each of the twelve nations of the European Community in 1988, we focus on political tolerance. Our basic hypothesis is that political activism contributes to greater political tolerance. Special attention is given to a sample of opinion leaders as a test of the elitist theory. The analysis is conducted both at the level of the individual citizen and the level of the nation state. This is one of very few efforts to test elitist theory from a broad, cross-national perspective. Consequently, the analysis will be crucial in recasting elitist theory to comport more closely with empirical evidence.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bachrach, Peter (1967).The Theory of Democratic Elitism: A Critique. Boston: Little, Brown.
Barnes, Samuel H. (1972). The legacy of fascism: Generational differences in Italian political attitudes and behavior.Comparative Political Studies 5: 41–57.
Barnes, Samuel H., and Antonio Lopez Pina (1982). Political Mobilization in Old and New Democracies: Spain in Comparative Perspective. Paper presented at the 1982 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Denver.
Barnum, David G., and John L. Sullivan (1989). Attitudinal tolerance and political freedom in Britain.British Journal of Political Science 19: 136–146.
Berelson, Bernard R., Paul F. Lazarsfeld, and William N. McPhee (1954).Voting. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Budge, Ian (1970).Agreement and the Stability of Democracy. Chicago: Markham Publishing Company.
Dahl, Robert A. (1971).Polyarchy. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Duch, Raymond M., and James L. Gibson (1992). “Putting up with” fascists in western Europe: A comparative, cross-level analysis of political tolerance.Western Political Quarterly 45:forthcoming.
Dye, Thomas R. (1976).Who's Running America: Institutional Leadership in the United States. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, Inc.
Dye, Thomas R., and Harmon Zeigler (1987).The Irony of Democracy: An Uncommon Introduction to American Politics, 7th ed. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing Co.
Fletcher, Joseph F. (1989). Mass and elite attitudes about wiretapping in Canada: Implications for democratic theory and politics.Public Opinion Quarterly 53: 225–245.
Gibson, James L. (1986). Pluralistic intolerance in America: A reconsideration.American Politics Quarterly 14: 267–293.
Gibson, James L. (1988). Political intolerance and political repression during the McCarthy red scare.American Political Science Review 82: 511–529.
Gibson, James L. (1989a) The policy consequences of political intolerance: Political repression during the Vietnam War era.Journal of Politics 51: 13–35.
Gibson, James L. (1989b). The structure of attitudinal tolerance in the United States.British Journal of Political Science 19: 562–570.
Gibson, James L. (1992). Alternative measures of political tolerance: Must tolerance be “least-liked?”American Journal of Political Science 36:forthcoming.
Gibson, James L., and Richard D. Bingham (1982). On the conceptualization and measurement of political tolerance.American Political Science Review 76: 603–620.
Gibson, James L., and Richard D. Bingham (1985).Civil Liberties and Nazis: The Skokie Free-Speech Controversy. New York: Praeger.
Hough, Jerry (1967). The Soviet Elite II: In whose hands the future?Problems of Communism 16: 18–25.
Inglehart, Ronald (1977).The Silent Revolution: Changing Values and Political Styles Among Western Publics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Inglehart, Ronald (1988). The renaissance of political culture.American Political Science Review 82: 1203–1230.
Jackman, Robert W. (1972). Political elites, mass publics, and support for democratic principles.Journal of Politics 34: 753–773.
Katz, Elihu, and Paul E. Lazarsfeld (1955).Personal Influence. New York: Free Press.
Key, V. O., Jr. (1961).Public Opinion and American Democracy. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
Kornhauser, William (1959).The Politics of Mass Society. New York: The Free Press of Glencoe.
Lipset, Seymour M. (1960).Political Man: The Social Bases of Politics. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.
McClosky, Herbert (1964). Consensus and ideology in American politics.American Political Science Review 58: 361–382.
McClosky, Herbert, and Alida Brill (1983).Dimensions of Tolerance: What Americans Think About Civil Liberties. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Mueller, John (1988). Trends in political tolerance.Public Opinion Quarterly 52: 1–25.
Muller, Edward N. (1979).Aggressive Political Participation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Nagel John D. (1975). A new look at the Soviet elite; A generational model of the Soviet system.Journal of Political and Military Sociology 3: 1–13.
Nunn, Clyde Z., Harry J. Crockett, Jr., and J. Allen Williams, Jr. (1978).Tolerance for Nonconformity. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Prothro, James W., and Charles M. Grigg (1960). Fundamental principles of democracy: Bases of agreement and disagreement.Journal of Politics 22: 276–294.
Putnam, Robert (1973). The political attitudes of senior civil servants in Western Europe: A preliminary report.British Journal of Political Science 3: 257–290.
Putnam, Robert (1976).The Comparative Study of Political Elites. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Rabier, Jacques-Rene, Helene Riffault, and Ronald Inglehart (1985).Euro-Barometer 21: Political Cleavages in the European Community, April (1984). Ann Arbor, MI: Interuniversity Consortium for Political and Social Research.
Reif, Karlheinz, and Oskar Niedermayer (1990). Supporters of Extremist Right Parties in Western Europe: Social Structure and Political Orientations. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, San Francisco, California.
Sniderman, Paul M., Joseph F. Fletcher, Peter H. Russell, Philip E. Tetlock, and Brian Gaines (1989). The Fallacy of Democratic Elitism: Elite Competition and Commitment to Civil Liberties. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Atlanta, Georgia.
Stouffer, Samuel C. (1955).Communism, Conformity, and Civil Liberties. New York: Doubleday.
Sullivan, John L., David G. Barnum, and George E. Marcus (1989). Conceptions and Misconceptions of Political Tolerance. Unpublished manuscript.
Sullivan, John L., and George E. Marcus (1988). A note on “Trends in Political Tolerance.”Public Opinion Quarterly 52: 26–32.
Sullivan, John L., James E. Piereson, and George E. Marcus (1982).Political Tolerance and American Democracy. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Sullivan, John L., Michal Shamir, Patrick Walsh, and Nigel S. Roberts (1985).Political Tolerance in Context: Support for Unpopular Minorities in Israel, New Zealand, and the United States. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, Inc.
Verba, Sidney, and Norman H. Nie (1972).Participation in America: Political Democracy and Social Equality. New York: Harper & Row.
Weil, Frederick D. (1985). The variable effects of education on liberal attitudes: A comparative-historical analysis of anti-semitism using public opinion survey data.American Sociological Review 50: 458–474.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gibson, J.L., Duch, R.M. Elitist theory and political tolerance in Western Europe. Polit Behav 13, 191–212 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992918
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992918