Skip to main content
Log in

On the independence and interdependence of syntactic and morphological properties: English aspectualcome andgo

  • Published:
Natural Language & Linguistic Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The English verbscome andgo in the ‘aspectual’ use exhibit a curious restriction: they may not appear in any overtly inflected form. We argue that this inflectional restriction is due to syntactic and thematic considerations which are independent of word formation, supporting the claim that the basic properties of inflectional morphology are to be analyzed by making reference to the syntax proper. Our analysis has implications for several other topics, including the structure of INFL, the mechanisms involved in affix lowering, the ban on unbound affixes, the LF properties of primary vs. secondary ϑ-role assigners, and the role played by pleonasticdo.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baker, Mark: 1988,Incorporation: A Theory of Grammatical Function Change, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, Mark: 1989, ‘Object Sharing and Projection in Serial Verb Constructions’,Linguistic Inquiry 20, 513–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belletti, Adriana: 1990,Generalized Verb Movement, Rosenberg & Sellier, Turin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carden, Guy and David Pesetsky: 1979, ‘Double Verb Constructions, Markedness, and a Fake Coordination’, inPapers from the Thirteenth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, pp. 82–92.

  • Chomsky, Noam: 1955,The Logical Structure of Linguistic Theory, Plenum [1975], New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam: 1957,Syntactic Structures, Mouton, The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam: 1965,Aspects of the Theory of Syntax, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam: 1981,Lectures on Government and Binding, Foris, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam: 1986a,Barriers, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam: 1986b,Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin and Use, Praeger, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam: 1991, ‘Some Notes on Economy of Derivation and Representation’, in R. Friedin (ed.),Principles and Parameters in Comparative Grammar, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, pp. 417–454.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emonds, Joseph: 1976,A Transformational Approach to English Syntax, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emonds, Joseph: 1985,A Unified Theory of Syntactic Categories, Foris, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enç, Mürvet: 1986, ‘Anchoring Conditions for Tense’,Linguistic Inquiry 18, 633–657.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fabb, Nigel: 1986,Syntactic Affixation, Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.

  • Guéron, Jacqueline and Teun Hoekstra: 1988, ‘T-Chains and Constituent Structure of Auxiliaries’, in A. Cardinaletti, G. Cinque, and G. Giusti (eds.),Constituent Structure: Papers from the 1987 GLOW Conference, Editoriale Programma.

  • Hale, Kenneth: 1978, ‘On the Position of Walbiri in a Typology of the Base’, unpublished manuscript, MIT.

  • Jaeggli, Osvaldo and Ken Safir: 1989, ‘The Null Subject Parameter and Parametric Theory’, in O. Jaeggli and K. Safir (eds.),The Null Subject Parameter, Kluwer, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, Kyle: 1988, ‘Verb Raising andhave’, inMcGill Working Papers in Linguistics: Special Issue on Comparative Germanic Syntax, McGill University, Montreal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kayne, Richard S.: 1987, ‘Facets of Romance Past Participle Agreement’, unpublished manuscript, MIT.

  • Kempchinsky, Paula: 1986,Romance Subjunctive Clauses and Logical Form, Ph.D. dissertation, UCLA.

  • Kitagawa, Yoshihisa: 1986,Subjects in Japanese and English, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koopman, Hilda: 1984,The Syntax of Verbs, Foris, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koopman, Hilda and Dominique Sportiche: 1991, ‘Subjects’, Lingua85, 211–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lord, Carol: 1974, ‘Causative Constructions in Yoruba’,Studies in in African Linguistics, suppl. 5, 195–204.

  • Perlmutter, David: 1971,Deep and Surface Structure Constraints in Syntax, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pesetsky, David: 1982,Paths and Categories, Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.

  • Pollock, Jean-Yves: 1989, ‘Verb Movement, Universal Grammar, and the Structure of IP’,Linguistic Inquiry 20, 365–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pullum, Geoffrey K.: 1990, ‘Constraints on Intransitive Quasi-serial Verb Constructions in Modern Colloquial English’,The Ohio State University Working Papers in Linguistics 39, 218–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, Ian: 1983, ‘The Syntax of English Modals’,WCCFL 2, Stanford University, pp. 227–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, Ian: 1985, ‘Agreement Patterns and the Development of the English Modal Auxiliaries’,NLLT 3, 21–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shopen, Timothy: 1971, ‘Caught in the Act’, inPapers from the Seventh Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, pp. 254–263.

  • Stowell, Tim: 1981,Origins of Phrase Structure, Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.

  • Tenny, Carol: 1987,Grammaticalizing Aspect and Affectedness, Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.

  • Travis, Lisa: 1984, Parameters and Effects of Word Order Variation, Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.

  • Zubizarreta, Maria-Luisa: 1981,On the Relationship of the Lexicon to Syntax, Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The Editors note with great sorrow the death of Osvaldo Jaeggli on August 20, 1990.

We would like to acknowledge helpful comments and discussion from Alfredo Arnaiz, Morris Halle, Kyle Johnson, Alec Marantz, David Pesetsky, Jean-Yves Pollock, Geoffrey Pullum, Ian Roberts, and Jean-Roger Vergnaud. A version of this paper was presented at the Midsummer's Syntax Workshop at UC Irvine during Spring 1990. Our thanks as well to the participants of that workshop for their comments. Thanks also to Susan Hirsh for editorial assistance.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jaeggli, O.A., Hyams, N.M. On the independence and interdependence of syntactic and morphological properties: English aspectualcome andgo . Nat Lang Linguist Theory 11, 313–346 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992916

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992916

Keywords

Navigation