Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Publication productivity in doctoral research departments: Interdisciplinary and intradisciplinary factors

  • Published:
Research in Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Examination of a national data set reporting departmental levels of publication productivity in 23 disciplines revealed very large differences between disciplines, with the mean departments in the most “productive” disciplines averaging more than 10 times the number of publications of the mean departments in the least “productive” disciplines. The differences within disciplines were also very large. Analyses of the characteristics of departments associated with productivity showed great variation across disciplines. Regression analyses indicated the importance of size and internal university support rather than federal support. Similar results are reported for the number of citations to the work of departments. The implications of these results for program review and the reputations of departments are reviewed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baird, L. L. (1986). What characterizes a productive research department?Research in Higher Education 25(3): 211–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn, R. T., Behymer, C. E., and Hall, E. E. (1988). Research note: Correlates of faculty publication.Sociology of Education 51: 132–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braxton, J. M. (1986). The normative structure of science: Social control in the academic profession. In J. C. Smart (ed.),Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, vol. 2. New York: Agathon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, M. F. (1985). Publication, performance, and reward in science and scholarship. In J. C. Smart (ed.),Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, vol. 1, pp. 255–282. New York: Agathon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoaglin, D. C., Mosteller, F., and Tukey, J. (1983).Understanding Robust and Exploratory Data Analysis. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, L. V., Lindsey, G., and Coggeshell, P. E. (1982).An Assessment of Research-Doctorate Programs in the United States (five volumes). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roose, K. D. and Andersen, G. J. (1970).A Rating of Graduate Programs. Washington, D.C.: American Council on Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunier, M. E. (1985). Objective measures as predictors of reputational ratings.Research in Higher Education 23(3): 227–244.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Educational Policy Studies, University of Kentucky, 145 Taylor Building, 40506-0001, Lexington, KY

    Leonard L. Baird

Authors
  1. Leonard L. Baird
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Baird, L.L. Publication productivity in doctoral research departments: Interdisciplinary and intradisciplinary factors. Res High Educ 32, 303–318 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992894

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992894

Keywords

Search

Navigation