Skip to main content
Log in

An interior point multiplicative method for optimization under positivity constraints

  • Published:
Acta Applicandae Mathematica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We analyze an algorithm for the problem minf(x) s.t.x ⩾ 0 suggested, without convergence proof, by Eggermont. The iterative step is given by x k+1j =x kj (1-λk▽f(x k)j) with λk > 0 determined through a line search. This method can be seen as a natural extension of the steepest descent method for unconstrained optimization, and we establish convergence properties similar to those known for steepest descent, namely weak convergence to a KKT point for a generalf, weak convergence to a solution for convexf and full convergence to the solution for strictly convexf. Applying this method to a maximum likelihood estimation problem, we obtain an additively overrelaxed version of the EM Algorithm. We extend the full convergence results known for EM to this overrelaxed version by establishing local Fejér monotonicity to the solution set.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cover, T. M.: An algorithm for maximizing expected log investment return,IEEE Trans. Information Theory IT30 (1984), 369–373.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Csiszár, I. and Tusnády, G.: Information geometry and alternating minimization procedures,Statistics and Decisions, Suppl. 1 (1984), 205–237.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dempster, A. P., Laird, M. N. and Rubin, D. B.: Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm,J. Royal Statist. Soc. Series B 37 (1977), 1–38.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dennis, J. E. and Schnabel, R. B.:Numerical Methods for Unconstrained Minimization and Nonlinear Equations, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Eggermont, P. P. B.: Multiplicative iterative algorithms for convex programming.Linear Algebra Appl. 130 (1990), 25–42.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Iusem, A. N.: Convergence analysis for a multiplicatively relaxed EM algorithm,Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 14 (1991), 673–593.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Iusem, A. N.: On the convergence of iterative methods for symmetric linear complementary problems,Math. Programming 59 (1993), 33–49.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Iusem, A. N.: A short convergence proof of the EM algorithm for a specific Poisson model,Rev. Brasileira Probab. Estatistica 6 (1992), 57–67.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Iusem, A. N. and Teboulle, M.: A regularized dual based iterative method for a class of image reconstruction problems,Inverse Problems 9 (1993), 679–696.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Karmarkar, N.: A new polynomial time algorithm for linear programming,Combinatorica 4 (1984), 373–395.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Meng, X.-L. and Pedlow, S.: EM: a bibliographic review with missing articles,ASA Proceedings, 1992.

  12. Ostrowsky, A. M.:Solutions of Equations and Systems of Equations, Academic Press, New York, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Pang, J. S.: Necessary and sufficient conditions for the convergence of iterative methods for the linear complementarity problem,J. Optim. Theory Appl. 42 (1984), 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Polyak, B.:Introduction to Optimization, Optimization Software, New York, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Vardi, Y., Shepp, L. A. and Kaufman, L.: A statistical model for Positron Emission Tomography,J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 80 (1985), 8–37.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Research for this paper was partially supported by CNPq grant No 301280/86.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Iusem, A.N. An interior point multiplicative method for optimization under positivity constraints. Acta Appl Math 38, 163–184 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992845

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992845

Mathematics subject classifications (1991)

Key words

Navigation