Skip to main content
Log in

The thematic hierarchy and causativity

  • Published:
Natural Language & Linguistic Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Chinese resultative compounds provide evidence that the thematic hierarchy is not the only factor determining the link between theta roles and syntactic arguments. Rather, it interacts with the causative hierarchy and when in conflict, can be overridden by the latter. This “asymmetrical” interaction between the two factors is shown to be responsible for the complex and, in some cases, totally unexpected patterns of ambiguity that resultative compounds demonstrate in various syntactic contexts. To the extent that the presence/absence of the causative hierarchy can be accurately predicted and its interaction with the thematic hierarchy explicitly specified, this paper lends support to the multi-dimensional nature of human language.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baker, Mark: 1988,Incorporation: A Theory of Grammatical Function Changing, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, Lisa: 1988, ‘Aspects of theBa-Construction’; in Carol Tenny (ed.),MIT Lexicon Project Working Papers 24, Cambridge, pp. 73–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, Lisa and Elizabeth Ritter: 1987, ‘A Small Clause Analysis of Inalienable Possession in Mandarin and French’, in James Blevins and Juli Carter (eds.),NELS 18, pp. 65–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam: 1981,Lectures on Government and Binding, Foris, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chu, Chauncey: 1973, ‘The Passive Construction: Chinese and English’,Journal of Chinese Linguistics 1, 437–470.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comrie, Bernard: 1975, ‘Review of Jackendoff 1972’,Linguistics 160, 71–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feng, Shengli: 1990, ‘The Passive Construction in Chinese’, unpublished manuscript, University of Pennsylvania.

  • Goodall, Grant: 1986, ‘On Argument Structure and L-marking with Mandarin Chineseba’, talk presented at NELS 17.

  • Goodall, Grant: 1989, ‘Evidence for an Asymmetry in Argument Structure’,Linguistic Inquiry 20, 669–674.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodall, Grant: 1991, ‘Mandarin Chinese Passives and the Nature of Case Absorption’, talk presented at the 3rd North American Conference on Chinese Linguistics, Ithaca.

  • Grimshaw, Jane: 1990,Argument Structure, MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hale, Kenneth and Jay Keyser: 1986, ‘Some Transitivity Alternations in English’,MIT Lexicon Project Working Papers 7, Cambridge.

  • Hale, Kenneth and Jay Keyser: 1987, ‘A View from the Middle’,MIT Lexicon Project Working Papers 10, Cambridge.

  • Hashimoto, Anne: 1971, ‘Mandarin Syntactic Structures’,Unicorn 8, 1–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higginbotham, James: 1985, ‘On Semantics’,Linguistic Inquiry 16, 547–593.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, James: 1982,Logical Relations in Chinese and the Theory of Grammar, Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.

  • Huang, James: 1988, ‘Wo Pao De Kuai and Chinese Phrase Structure’,Language 64, 274–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackendoff, Ray: 1972,Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar, The MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackendoff, Ray: 1983,Semantics and Cognition, MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackendoff, Ray: 1990,Semantic Structure, MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Audrey: 1990,Order and Constituency in Mandarin Chinese, Kluwer, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Charles and Sandra Thompson: 1981,Mandarin Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar, University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Yafei: 1990a, ‘On V-V Compounds in Chinese’,Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 8, 177–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Yafei: 1990b, ‘X0-binding and Verb-incorporation’,Linguistic Inquiry 21, 299–426.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Yafei: 1993, ‘Structural Head and Aspectuality’,Language 69, 480–504.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Yafei: to appear, ‘Chinese Resultative Constructions and the UTAH’, in J. Packard (ed.),Word Formation in Chinese, Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin.

  • Pesetsky, David: 1987, ‘Binding Problems with Experiencer Verbs’,Linguistic Inquiry 18, 126–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pesetsky, David: 1995, ‘Zero Syntax’, MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pustejovsky, James: 1991, ‘The Syntax of Event Structure’,Cognition 41, 47–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, M: 1975, ‘Generative vs. Interpretive Semantics’,Foundations of Language 12, 561–582.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, Sandra: 1973, ‘Resultative Verb Compounds in Mandarin Chinese: A Case for Lexical Rules’,Language 49, 361–379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Travis, Lisa: 1984,Parameters and Effects of Word Order Variation, Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.

  • Wang, Li: 1947,Zhongguo Xiandai Yufa, China Press, Shanghai.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Li: 1958,Hanyu Shirao, Science Press, Beijing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Peter: 1986, ‘Additional Support for the Transformational Approach to MandarinBa andBei’, in S. Teng (ed.),Readings in Chinese Transformational Syntax, Crane Publishing Co., Taipei, pp. 67–75.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The data as shown in (4) was brought to my attention by Bao Zhiming. I thank Jane Grimshaw for discussing the basic analysis with me at its beginning stage. Grimshaw (1990) has important influence on the ways in which my analysis is presented. This revised version benefits greatly from the detailed comments of threeNLLT reviewers and Carol Georgopoulos. I am also grateful to Emily Huang, Teng Qiuyun, Wang Yuyan, and Xie Qing for providing judgments on the Chinese data.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Li, Y. The thematic hierarchy and causativity. Nat Lang Linguist Theory 13, 255–282 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992783

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992783

Keywords

Navigation