Research in Higher Education

, Volume 21, Issue 4, pp 397–414 | Cite as

Economic costs and benefits of educating foreign students in the United States

  • Salim Chishti
Article

Abstract

In recent years some western European countries have adopted restrictive rationing/pricing policies to regulate the accelerated inflow of foreign students. There is no such policy in the U.S. If the current trends continue the population of foreign students in the U.S. may reach one million or so by 1990. In view of their large and rapidly expanding number, it is of some interest to study the economics of their education. An attempt is made here to estimate the economic costs and economic benefits to the U.S. of educating foreign students. It should be emphasized at the outset that the conceptual and data problems have made it impossible to estimate some economic costs and benefits, thereby constraining the comprehensiveness of the overall estimates.

Keywords

European Country Economic Benefit Education Research Economic Cost Current Trend 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. American Council on Education.Foreign Students and Institutional Policy: Toward an Agenda for Action. A Report of the Committee on Foreign Students and Institutional Policy, 1982.Google Scholar
  2. Blaugh, M. The economic costs and benefits of overseas studies. In P. Williams (ed.),The Overseas Student Question: Studies for Policy. London: Heinemann, 1981.Google Scholar
  3. Chishti, S. International demand for American higher education.Research in Higher Education 1984,20 329–344.Google Scholar
  4. Flowerdew, T., and Layard, R. How much should overseas students pay?The New York Times Higher Education Supplement, March 19, 1976, p. 11.Google Scholar
  5. Freman, R. B.The Overeducated American. New York: Academic Press, 1976.Google Scholar
  6. Gray, L. Education Finance. In I. Waitt (ed.)College Administration: A Handbook. NATFHE, 1980.Google Scholar
  7. Immigration and Naturalization Services. Statistical Yearbook, 1980. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1981.Google Scholar
  8. Institute of International Education,Open Doors 1980/81. Report on International Educational Exchange.Google Scholar
  9. National Center for Education Statistics.Digest of Education 1982. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1982.Google Scholar
  10. National Science Foundation Academic Supplement, 1979. Google Scholar
  11. Ohio Board of Regents.Expenditures and Resource Requirements. Unrestricted I&G Expenditures, 1980/81.Google Scholar
  12. Schultz, T. W. Capital formation by education.Journal of Political Economy 1960,68 571–583.Google Scholar
  13. Skoro, L. C. and Hryvniak, G. The productivity of U.S. higher education: 1967–1977.Research in Higher Education 1980,13 147–187.Google Scholar
  14. Williams, P. (ed.)The Overseas Student Question: Studies for a Policy. London: Heinemann, 1981.Google Scholar
  15. Wipsud, H. R. (ed.)International Education Programs of the U.S. Government. An Inventory: International Education Task Force (Federal Interagency Committee on Education). Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education, 1978.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Agathon Press, Inc. 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • Salim Chishti
    • 1
  1. 1.Applied Economics Research CentreUniversity of KarachiPakistan

Personalised recommendations