Abstract
This experiment investigated the effects of a comprehensive teaching assistant (TA) training program on the teaching anxiety and effectiveness of TAs. Twenty-seven TAs in the English department of a research university were divided into experimental and control groups. Both groups participated in a one-week workshop and a sixteen-week theory and pedagogy course during a fall semester. TAs in the experimental group also participated in a consultant observation program and peer mentoring activities. Data resulting from the completed pretests and posttests for teaching anxiety and effectiveness were analyzed using either at-test or an analysis of covariance. Conclusions from the study include: (1) Declines in teaching anxiety for TAs in the experimental group were significantly greater. (2) Neither group of TAs improved in teaching effectiveness, as measured by general student evaluations. However, based on posttest means for these student ratings, the teaching effectiveness of the experimental group was rated significantly higher. (3) Student ratings of teaching effectiveness in composition for TAs in the experimental group were significantly higher. (4) There were no significant differences between pre- to posttest changes in the self-appraisals of teaching effectiveness for the groups.
This is a preview of subscription content,
to check access.Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abbott, R. D., Wulff, D. H., and Szego, C. K. (1989). Review of research on TA training. In J. D. Nyquist, R. D. Abbott, and D. H. Wulff (eds.),Teaching Assistant Training in the 1990s (pp. 111–124). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Bowen, H. R., and Schuster, J. S. (1986).American Professors: A National Resource Imperiled. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Buitink, J., and Kemme, S. (1986). Changes in student-teacher thinking.European Journal of Teacher Education 9(1):75–84.
Carroll, J. G. (1980). Effects of training programs for university teaching assistants.Journal of Higher Education 51(2):167–183.
Clinic to Improve University Teaching (1974).Teaching Analysis by Students System. Amherst: University of Massachusetts.
Cohen, J. (1977).Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. New York: Academic Press.
Doyal, G. T., and Forsyth, R. A. (1973). The relationship between teacher and student anxiety levels.Psychology in the Schools 10(2):231–233.
Erdle, S., Murray, H. G., and Rushton, J. P. (1985). Personality, classroom behavior, and student ratings of college teaching effectiveness: A path analysis.Journal of Educational Psychology 77(4):394–407.
Erickson, G. R., and Erickson, B. L. (1979). Improving college teaching.Journal of Higher Education 50(5):673–685.
Flanigan, M. C. (1979). Observing teaching: Discovering and developing the individual's teaching style.Writing Program Administration 3(2):17–24.
Parsons, J. S. (1973). Assessment of anxiety about teaching using the Teaching Anxiety Scale: Manual and research report. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association (ERIC Documents Reproduction Service No. 079 330).
Phillips, D. A., Carlisle, C. S., Hautala, R., and Larson, R. (1985). Personality traits and teacher-student behaviors in physical education.Journal of Educational Psychology 77(4):408–416.
Siegel, S. (1956).Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Spielberger, C. D. (1966). Theory and research on anxiety. In C. D. Spielberger (ed.),Anxiety and Behavior (pp. 3–20). New York: Academic Press.
Witte, S. P., Daly, J. A., Faigley, L., and Koch, W. R. (1983). An instrument for reporting composition course and teacher effectiveness in college writing programs.Research in the Teaching of English 17(3):243–261.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Williams, L.S. The effects of a comprehensive teaching assistant training program on teaching anxiety and effectiveness. Res High Educ 32, 585–598 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992630
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992630