Skip to main content
Log in

Factors related to doctoral dissertation topic selection

  • Published:
Research in Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although the completed doctoral dissertation represents the culmination of a doctoral program, is often published in journal articles, and serves as the foundation of the early research career of the author, the dissertation has received relatively little attention as a subject of research in its own right. To learn more about how students select their dissertation topics, all doctoral graduates of a major midwestern research university over the one year period from spring quarter, 1986, through winter quarter, 1987, were surveyed. Results indicate that a number of factors influence the selection of a dissertation topic, but not surprisingly the most important is the student's own preference. The factors affecting the choice of topics include the preference of the adviser, trends in the field, the likelihood that the research will be published, and the projected benefit of the research on the student's job prospects. The importance of the factors vary by field and in some cases by gender. When students select their topic and the extent to which the adviser and dissertation committees are responsive to the student also vary by field.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aronson, J. A., Bennett, D., Moore, L. V., and Stoll, N. C. (1985). Student personnel dissertation topics, 1979 to 1983.Journal of College Student Personnel 26: 262–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bargar, R. R. and Duncan, J. K. (1982). Cultivating creative endeavor in doctoral research.Journal of Higher Education 53(1): 1–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barr, M. A. (1984). The selection of a dissertation topic: Elements influencing student choice. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Ohio State University, Columbus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berelson, B. (1960).Graduate Education in the United States. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chodorow, N. (1978).The Reproduction of Mothering. Berkeley, CA: Univ. of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunham, D. R. and Lumsden, D. B. (1981). Dissertation research: Part 1, its relation to human thought.Community/Junior College Research Quarterly 5: 121–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, C. (1982).In a Different Voice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heiss, A. M. (1967). Berkeley doctoral students appraise their academic programs.Educational Record, Winter, 30–44.

  • Heiss, A. M. (1970).Challenges to Graduate Schools. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horace Rackham School of Graduate Studies (1976). The role of the dissertation in doctoral education at the University of Michigan. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacks, P., Chubin, D. E., Porter, A. L., and Connolly, T. (1983). The ABC's of ABDs: A study of incomplete doctorates.Improving College and University Teaching 31: 74–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lansbury, P. T. (1975). Selection of thesis research: The most important cause.Journal of Chemical Education 52: 510–511.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (1987).Summary report 1986: Doctorate Recipients from United States Universities. Washington, DC: National Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sales, E. (1975). The doctoral student experience: A preliminary study.Journal of Education for Social Work 11(2): 102–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seeman, J. (1973). On supervising student research.American Psychologist 28: 900–906.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sessions, R. R. (1971). Factors related to dissertation topic selection: Student personnel and guidance.Dissertation Abstracts International, 5554-A.

  • Spriestersbach, D. C., and Henry, L. D., Jr. (1978). The Ph.D. dissertation: Servant or master?Improving College and University Teaching 26: 52–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statham, A. E., and Richardson, L. (1980). Sex typed teaching styles among professors and student reactions. Washington, DC: National Institute of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toombs, W. (1977). Awareness and use of academic research by doctoral students.Research in Higher Education 7: 43–65.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Isaac, P.D., Koenigsknecht, R.A., Malaney, G.D. et al. Factors related to doctoral dissertation topic selection. Res High Educ 30, 357–373 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992560

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992560

Keywords

Navigation