Abstract
Prior research on political judgment has been polarized, with one group emphasizing normative models of political inference and the other emphasizing heuristic models of political inference. In accordance with recent findings in psychology, this article is rooted in the assumption that both normative and heuristic criteria simultaneously influence political judgments. Furthermore, differences in the relative extent to which these two processes serve to determine political judgments are hypothesized to depend on the nature of the judgment task. Two kinds of political judgments are considered: judgments reflecting beliefs about the candidates' stands on the issues and judgments reflecting global evaluations of the candidates. The reported results confirm that (1) voters rely on both normative- and heuristic-based considerations when forming these judgments, and (2) the relative extent to which these criteria influence these judgments depends on the complexity of the judgment task.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ajzen, Icek, and Fishbein, Martin (1975). A Bayesian analysis of attribution processes.Psychological Bulletin 85: 239–243.
Bodenhausen, Galen V., and Lichtenstein, Meryl (1986). Social stereotypes and information-processing strategies: The impact of task complexity.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 52: 871–880.
Brent, Edward, and Granberg, Donald (1982). Subjective agreement with the presidential candidates of 1976 and 1980.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 42: 393–403.
Brody, Richard A., and Page, Benjamin I. (1972). Comment: The assessment of policy voting.American Political Science Review 66: 450–458.
Campbell, Angus, Converse, Phillip E., Miller, Warren E., and Stokes, Donald E. (1960).The American Voter. New York: Wiley.
Campbell, Angus, Gurin, Gerald, and Miller, Warren E. (1954).The Voter Decides. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson.
Dion, Kathleen K., Bersheid, Ellen, and Walster, Elaine H. (1972). What is beautiful is good.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 24: 285–290.
Downs, Anthony (1957).An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper & Row.
Fishbein, Martin, and Ajzen, Icek (1981). Attitudes and voting behavior: An application of the theory of reasoned action. In Gordon M. Stephenson and James M. Davis (eds.),Progress in Applied Social Psychology. New York: Wiley.
Fiske, Susan T., and Pavelchak, Mark A. (1986). Category-based versus piecemeal-based affective responses: Developments in schema-triggered affect. In Richard M. Sorrentino and E. Tory Higgins (eds.),Handbook of Motivation and Cognition: Foundations of Social Behavior. New York: Guilford Press.
Gollob, Harry F. (1974). The subject-verb-object approach to social cognition.Psychological Review 81: 286–321.
Granberg, Donald, and Brent, Edward E. (1974). Dove-Hawk placements in the 1968 election: Application of social judgment and balance theories.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 29: 687–695.
Granberg, Donald, and Brent, Edward E. (1980). Perceptions of issue positions of presidential candidates.American Scientist 68: 617–646.
Heider, Fritz (1958).The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations. New York: Wiley.
Iyengar, Shanto, Peters, Mark D., and Kinder, Donald R. (1982). Experimental demonstrations of the “not-so-minimal” consequences of television news programs.American Political Science Review 76: 848–858.
Johnson, Eric J., Payne, John W., and Bettman, James R. (1989). Information displays and preference reversals. Carnegie-Mellon University. Photocopy.
Keren, Gideon, and Wagenaar, Willem A. (1989). Violation of utility theory in unique and repeated gambles.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. Forthcoming.
Kinder, Donald R. (1978). Political person perception: The asymmetrical influence of sentiment and choice on perceptions of presidential candidates.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 8: 859–871.
Kuklinski, James H., Ottati, Victor, Riggle, Ellen, Schwarz, Norbert, and Wyer, Robert S. (1987). The influence of candidate physical attractiveness of voters' judgments about the candidate. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago, IL.
Lodge, Milton, and Hammil, Ruth (1986). A partisan schema for political information processing.American Political Science Review 80: 505–519.
McGuire, William J. (1981). The probabilogical model of cognitive structure and attitude change. In Richard E. Petty, Thomas M. Ostrom, and Timothy C. Brock (eds.),Cognitive Responses in Persuasion. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Nisbett, Richard E., Krantz, David H., Jepson, Christopher C., and Kunda, Ziva (1983). The use of statistical heuristics in everyday inductive reasoning.Psychological Review 90: 339–363.
Nisbett, Richard, and Ross, Lee (1980).Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Ottati, Victor, Fishbein, Martin, and Middlestadt, Susan E. (1988). Determinants of voters' beliefs about the candidates' stands on the issues: The role of evaluative bias heuristics and the candidates' expressed message.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 55: 1–13.
Page, Benjamin I., and Brody, Richard A. (1972). Policy voting and the electoral process: The Viet Nam War Issue.American Political Science Review 66: 979–995.
Peterson, Charles R., and Beach, Lawrence (1967). Man as an intuitive statistician.Psychological Bulletin 68: 29–46.
Sherman, Steven J., and Corty, Eric (1984). Cognitive heuristics. In Robert S. Wyer and Thomas K. Srull (eds.),Handbook of Social Cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Tajfel, H. (1981).Human Groups and Social Categories: Studies in Social Psychology. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Tversky, Amos, and Kahneman, Daniel (1982). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. In Daniel Kahneman, Paul Slovic, and Amos Tversky (eds.),Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wyer, Robert S., and Goldberg, Lee (1970). A probabilistic analysis of the relations among beliefs and attitudes.Psychological Review 22: 100–120.
Zajonc, Robert B. (1968). Cognitive theories in social psychology. In Garner Lindzey and Elliot Aronson (eds.),Handbook of Social Psychology. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ottati, V.C. Determinants of political judgments: The joint influence of normative and heuristic rules of inference. Polit Behav 12, 159–179 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992467
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992467