Abstract
Survey data from 458 former health science graduate students were examined for correlations between variables that might be used in selecting research training award recipients and successful training outcome defined as a highly productive research career. Scores on six research outcome variables were used to cluster respondents into two groups: active and less-active researchers. After exploring factors underlying thirteen predictor variables, discriminant analysis was employed to identify predictive strength. There were no significant direct or indirect correlations between posttraining research activity and either the overall undergraduate academic grade of respondents or the amount of encouragement they received from the sponsors of their graduate award applications. An additional seven variables also showed no significant correlation with research career outcome. They were science hobbies as a child; undergraduate prizes and awards; summers spent in research; undergraduate publications; prestige and research orientation of undergraduate environment; and prestige of graduate institution. Four variables that showed promise as useful indicators of posttraining research activity were investigative personality; research orientation of the graduate environment; focused energy personality; and, to a lesser extent, preuniversity interest in science.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Clark, M. J., and Centra, J. (1982).Conditions Influencing the Career Accomplishments of Ph.Ds. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service, GRE Board Report 76-2R.
Clemente, F. (1973). Early career determinants of research productivity.American Journal of Sociology 79(2): 409–419.
Crooks, L. A., Campbell, J. T., and Rock, D. A. (1979).Predicting Career Progress of Graduate Students in Management. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service, Research Report 79-15.
Davis, J. A. (1965). What college teachers value in students.College Board Review 56: 15–18.
Folger, J. K., Astin, H. S., and Bayer, A. E. (1970).Human Resources and Higher Education. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Hartnett, R. T., and Willingham, W. W. (1979).The Criterion Problem: What Measure of Success in Graduate Education? Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service, GRE Board Report 77-4R.
Hinman, S. L. (1967). A predictive validity study of creative managerial performance. Thesis, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Medawar, P. B. (1979).Advice to a Young Scientist. New York: Harper & Row.
Medical Research Council of Canada (1986).Technical Reports: Research Training for Health Professionals. MRC, Ottawa, Report 2.
O'Brecht, M. and Bois, P. (1988). Characteristics of active and less-active researchers in a group of Canadian health professionals.Journal of Medical Education 63(4): 327–329.
Price, P. B., Taylor, C. W., Nelson, D. E., Lewis, E. G., Loughmiller, G. D., Mathieson, R., Murray, S. L., and Maxwell, J. G. (1971).Measurement and Predictors of Physician Performance. Salt Lake City, Utah: LLR Press.
Reilly, R. R. (1974).Critical Incidents of Graduate Student Performance. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
Segal, S. M., Busse, T. V., and Mansfield, R. S. (1980). The relationship of scientific creativity in the biological sciences to postdoctoral accomplishments and experiences.American Educational Research Journal 17(4): 491–502.
Zumeta, W. (1983).Extending the Educational Ladder: The Changing Role of Postdoctoral Training in the United States. Report to National Science Foundation on Grant SRS 80-11953.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
O'Brecht, M., Pihl, R.O. & Bois, P. Criteria for granting research training awards to graduate students. Res High Educ 30, 647–664 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992393
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992393